Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Comparison of fluoridated apatites with pure hydroxyapatite as potential biomimetic alternatives to enamel for laboratory-based bond strength studies Cover

Comparison of fluoridated apatites with pure hydroxyapatite as potential biomimetic alternatives to enamel for laboratory-based bond strength studies

Open Access
|Dec 2023

References

  1. Fox NA, McCabe JF, Buckley JG. A critique of bond strength testing in orthodontics. Br J Orthod 1994;21: 33–43.
  2. Bishara SE, Soliman M, Laffoon J, Warren JJ. Effect of changing a test parameter on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod 2005;75:832–5.
  3. Buonocore MG, Matsui A, Gwinnett AJ. Penetration of resin dental materials into enamel surfaces with reference to bonding. Arch Oral Biol 1968;13:61–70.
  4. Gilpatrick RO, Ross JA, Simonsen RJ. Resin-to-enamel bond strengths with various etching times. Quintessence Int 1991;22:47–9.
  5. Barkmeier WW, Shaffer SE, Gwinnett AJ. Effects of 15 vs 60 second enamel acid conditioning on adhesion and morphology. Oper Dent 1986;11:111–16.
  6. Gwinnett AJ. Structure and composition of enamel. Oper Dent 1992; Suppl 5:10–17.
  7. Shaffer SE, Barkmeier WW, Gwinnett AJ. Effect of disinfection/sterilization on in-vitro enamel bonding. J Dent Educ 1985;49:658–9.
  8. Tate WH, White RR. Disinfection of human teeth for educational purposes. J Dent Educ 1991;55:583–5.
  9. DeWald JP. The use of extracted teeth for in vitro bonding studies: a review of infection control considerations. Dent Mater 1997;13:74–81.
  10. Dominici JT, Eleazer PD, Clark SJ, Staat RH, Scheetz JP. Disinfection/sterilization of extracted teeth for dental student use. J Dent Educ 2001;65:1278–80.
  11. Saleh F, Taymour N. Validity of using bovine teeth as a substitute for human counterparts in adhesive tests. East Mediterr Health J 2003;9:201–7.
  12. Dickinson PT, Powers JM. Evaluation of fourteen direct-bonding orthodontic bases. Am J Orthod 1980;78:630–9.
  13. Evans LB, Powers JM. Factors affecting in vitro bond strength of no-mix orthodontic cements. Am J Orthod 1985;87:508–12.
  14. Mackay F. The effect of adhesive type and thickness on bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Br J Orthod 1992;19: 35–9.
  15. Martin SE, Wohl T, Rekow ED. Relative bond strength of orthodontic bonding materials to a non-tooth substrate. J Dent Res 1996;75:172. (Abstract 1240)
  16. Wohl T, Rekow ED. An alternative material substrate for bond strength testing. J Dent Res 1996;75;173. (Abstract 1244)
  17. Klocke A, Tadic D, Kahl-Nieke B, Epple M. An optimized synthetic substrate for orthodontic bond strength testing. Dent Mater 2003;19:773–8.
  18. Imthiaz N, Georgiou G, Moles DR, Jones SP. Comparison of hydroxyapatite and dental enamel for testing shear bond strengths. Aust Orthod J 2008;24:15–20.
  19. Årtun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod 1984;85:333–40.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aoj-2009-0003 | Journal eISSN: 2207-7480 | Journal ISSN: 2207-7472
Language: English
Page range: 12 - 18
Submitted on: Sep 1, 2008
Accepted on: Jan 1, 2009
Published on: Dec 14, 2023
Published by: Australian Society of Orthodontists Inc.
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2023 Steven P. Jones, Godwin C.Y. Cheuk, George Georgiou, David R. Moles, published by Australian Society of Orthodontists Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.