References
- Fauchard P. Le Chirurgien Dentiste. Second edition, 1746. Paris, France.
- Angle EH. The latest and best in orthodontic mechanism. Dental Cosmos 1928;70:1143–58.
- Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955;34:849–53.
- Newman GV. Epoxy adhesives for orthodontic attachments: progress report. Am J Orthod 1965;51:901–12.
- Andrews LF. The straight-wire appliance, origin, controversy, commentary. J Clin Orthod 1976;10:99–114.
- Harradine NW. Self-ligating brackets and treatment efficiency. Clin Orthod Res 2001;4:220–7.
- Miles PG. SmartClip versus conventional twin brackets for initial alignment: is there a difference? Aust Orthod J 2005;21:123–7.
- Roth RH. The straight-wire appliance 17 years later. J Clin Orthod 1987;21:632–42.
- McLaughlin RP, Bennett JC. The transition from standard edgewise to preadjusted appliance systems. J Clin Orthod 1989;23:142–53.
- Rinchuse DJ, Rinchuse DJ, Kapur-Wadhwa R. Orthodontic appliance design. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 131:76–82.
- Harradine NW. Self-ligating brackets: where are we now? J Orthod 2003;30:262–73.
- Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, Scribante A, Klersy C, Auricchio F. Evaluation of friction of conventional and metal-insert ceramic brackets in various bracket-archwire combinations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124: 403–9.
- Stolzenberg J. The Russell attachment and its improved advantages. Int J Orthod Dent Children 1935;21:837–40.
- Damon DH. The Damon low-friction bracket: a biologically compatible straight-wire system. J Clin Orthod 1998; 32:670–80.
- Sims AP, Waters NE, Birnie DJ. A comparison of the forces required to produce tooth movement ex vivo through three types of pre-adjusted brackets when subjected to determined tip or torque values. Br J Orthod 1994;21:367–73.
- Maijer R, Smith DC. Time savings with self-ligating brackets. J Clin Orthod 1990;24:29–31.
- Eberting JJ, Straja SR, Tuncay OC. Treatment time, outcome, and patient satisfaction comparisons of Damon and conventional brackets. Clin Orthod Res 2001;4:228–34.
- Shivapuja PK, Berger J. A comparative study of conventional ligation and self-ligation bracket systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;106:472–80.
- Taloumis LJ, Smith TM, Hondrum SO, Lorton L. Force decay and deformation of orthodontic elastomeric ligatures. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;111:1–11.
- Dowling PA, Jones WB, Lagerstom L, Sandham JA. An investigation into the behavioural characteristics of orthodontic elastomeric modules. Br J Orthod 1998;25:197–202.
- Rock WP, Wilson HJ, Fisher SE. Force reduction of orthodontic elastomeric chains after one month in the mouth. Br J Orthod 1986;13:147–50.
- Wong AK. Orthodontic elastic materials. Angle Orthod 1976;46:196–205.
- Hain M, Dhopatkar A, Rock P The effect of ligation method on friction in sliding mechanics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;123:416–22.
- Sims AP, Waters NE, Birnie DJ, Pethybridge RJ. A comparison of the forces required to produce tooth movement in vitro using two self-ligating brackets and a pre-adjusted bracket employing two types of ligation. Eur J Orthod 1993; 15:377–85.
- Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Eliades T. Failure rate of self-ligating and edgewise brackets bonded with conventional acid etching and a self-etching primer: a prospective in vivo study. Angle Orthod 2006;76:119–22.
- Read-Ward GE, Jones SP, Davis EH. A comparison of selfligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems. Br J Orthod 1997;24:309–17.
- Pandis N, Strigou S, Eliades T. Maxillary incisor torque with conventional and self-ligating brackets: a prospective clinical trial. Orthod Craniofac Res 2006;9:193–8.
- Schumacher HA, Bourauel C, Drescher D. The friction behavior of the ceramic bracket in archwire-guided tooth movement. Fortschr Kieferorthop 1990;51:259–65.
- Meling TR, Odegaard J, Holthe K, Segner D. The effect of friction on the bending stiffness of orthodontic beams: a theoretical and in vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;112:41–9.
- Bednar JR, Gruendeman GW, Sandrik JL. A comparative study of frictional forces between orthodontic brackets and archwires. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;100: 513–22.
- Voudouris JC. Interactive edgewise mechanisms: form and function comparison with conventional edgewise brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;111:119–40.
- Thomas S, Sherriff M, Birnie D. A comparative in vitro study of the frictional characteristics of two types of selfligating brackets and two types of pre-adjusted edgewise brackets tied with elastomeric ligatures. Eur J Orthod 1998; 20:589–96.
- Kapur R, Sinha PK, Nanda RS. Frictional resistance of the Damon SL bracket. J Clin Orthod 1998;32:485–9.
- Pizzoni L, Ravnholt G, Melsen B. Frictional forces related to self-ligating brackets. Eur J Orthod 1998;20:283–91.
- Khambay B, Millett D, McHugh S. Evaluation of methods of archwire ligation on frictional resistance. Eur J Orthod 2004;26:327–32.
- Griffiths HS, Sherriff M, Ireland AJ. Resistance to sliding with 3 types of elastomeric modules. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;127:670–5.
- Tecco S, Festa F, Caputi S, Traini T, Di Iorio D, D’Attilio M. Friction of conventional and self-ligating brackets using a 10 bracket model. Angle Orthod 2005;75:1041–5.
- Henao SP, Kusy RP. Frictional evaluations of dental typodont models using four self-ligating designs and a conventional design. Angle Orthod 2005;75:75–85.
- Matasa CG. Self-engaging brackets: passive vs active. Orthodontic Materials Insider 1996;9:5–11.
- Henao SP, Kusy RP. Evaluation of the frictional resistance of conventional and self-ligating bracket designs using standardized archwires and dental typodonts. Angle Orthod 2004;74:202–11.
- Meikle MC. The tissue, cellular, and molecular regulation of orthodontic tooth movement: 100 years after Carl Sandstedt. Eur J Orthod 2006;28:221–40.
- Braun S, Bluestein M, Moore BK, Benson G. Friction in perspective. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;115: 619–27.
- Loftus BP, Artun J, Nicholls JI, Alonzo TA, Stoner JA. Evaluation of friction during sliding tooth movement in various bracket-arch wire combinations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;116:336–45.
- Thorstenson GA, Kusy RP. Comparison of resistance to sliding between different self-ligating brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and saliva states. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;121:472–82.
- Thorstenson GA, Kusy RP. Effect of archwire size and material on the resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets with second-order angulation in the dry state. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;122:295–305.
- O’Reilly D, Dowling PA, Lagerstrom L, Swartz ML. An exvivo investigation into the effect of bracket displacement on the resistance to sliding. Br J Orthod 1999;26:219–27.
- Iwasaki LR, Beatty MW, Nickel JC. Friction and orthodontic mechanics: clinical studies of moment and ligation effects. Semin Orthod 2003;9:290–7.
- Berger J, Byloff FK. The clinical efficiency of self-ligated brackets. J Clin Orthod 2001;35:304–8.
- Turnbull NR, Birnie DJ. Treatment efficiency of conventional vs self-ligating brackets: effects of archwire size and material. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131: 395–9.
- Miles PG, Weyant RJ, Rustveld L. A clinical trial of Damon 2 vs conventional twin brackets during initial alignment. Angle Orthod 2006;76:480–5.
- Garino F, Favero L. Control of tooth movements with the Speed system. Prog Orthod 2003;4:23–30.
- Damon DH. The rationale, evolution and clinical application of the self-ligating bracket. Clin Orthod Res 1998;1: 52–61.
- Fleming PS, DiBiase AT, Sarri G, Lee RT. A comparison of mandibular arch changes during alignment and leveling with 2 pre-adjusted edgewise appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop (In press)
- Cash AC, Good SA, Curtis RV, McDonald F. An evaluation of slot size in orthodontic brackets: are standards as expected? Angle Orthod 2004;74:450–3.
- Gioka C, Eliades T. Materials-induced variation in the torque expression of preadjusted appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;125:323–8.
- Rinchuse DJ, Miles PG. Self-ligating brackets: present and future. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:216–22.
- Kattner PF, Schneider BJ. Comparison of Roth appliance and standard edgewise appliance treatment results. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;103:24–32.