Three-dimensional computed craniofacial tomography (3D-CT): potential uses and limitations

Hong Jin Chan; Michael Woods; Damien Stella

doi:10.2478/aoj-2007-0010

.blurhash-client-img { display: none !important; }

Three-dimensional computed craniofacial tomography (3D-CT): potential uses and limitations

Australasian Orthodontic Journal

Volume 23 (2007): Issue 1 (May 2007)

By: Hong Jin Chan, Michael Woods and Damien Stella

Open Access

|Dec 2023

Abstract

Aims

To determine the potential uses and limitations of 3D-CT craniofacial imaging in contemporary clinical practice.

Methods

The relevant historical and contemporary literature was reviewed.

Results

There would seem to be many potential uses for 3D-CT craniofacial imaging in clinical practice. Significant limitations may, however, relate to the availability and cost of such imaging and the delivered radiation dose.

Conclusions

With continued research and development, the use of such 3D-CT craniofacial imaging techniques may become appropriate for future orthodontic and clinical diagnostic applications.

References

Broadbent B. A new X-ray technique and its application to orthodontia. Angle Orthod 1931;1:45–66.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Quintero J, Trosien A, Hatcher D, Kapila S. Craniofacial imaging in orthodontics: historical prespective, current status, and future developments. Angle Orthod 1999;69: 491–506.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Parks E. Computed tomography applications for dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 2000;44:371–94.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dawn S, Gotway M, Webb W. Multidetector-row spiral computed tomography in the diagnosis of thoracic diseases. Respir Care 2001;46:912–21.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kalra M, Maher M, Toth T, Hamberg L, Blake M, Shepard J et al. Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology 2004;230:619–28.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Saini S. Multi-detector row CT: principles and practice for abdominal applications. Radiology 2004;233:323–7.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M, Huber E, Zankl M, Martinoff S et al. Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates. Circulation 2006;113:1305–10.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sun Z, Jiang W. Diagnostic value of multislice computed tomography angiography in coronary artery disease: a metaanalysis. Eur J Radiol 2006;60:279–86.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hajeer M, Millett D, Ayoub A, Siebert J. Applications of 3D imaging in orthodontics: Part I. J Orthod 2004;31:62–70.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cavalcanti M, Rocha S, Vannier M. Craniofacial measurements based on 3D-CT volume rendering: implications for clinical applications. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33: 170–6.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Matteson S, Bechtold W, Phillips C, Staab E. A method for three-dimensional image reformation for quantitative cephalometric analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1989;47: 1053–61.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hildebolt C, Vannier M, Knapp R. Validation study of skull three-dimensional computerized tomography measurements. Am J Phys Anthropol 1990;82:283–94.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Halazonetis D. From 2-dimensional cephalograms to 3-dimensional computed tomography scans. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;127:627–37.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kawamata A, Ariji Y, Langlais R. Three-dimensional computed tomography imaging in dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 2000;44:395–410.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Luka B, Brechtelsbauer D, Gellrich N-C, König M. 2D and 3D CT reconstructions of the facial skeleton: an unnecessary option or a diagnostic pearl? Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;24:76–83.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Udupa J. Three-dimensional visualization and analysis methodologies: a current prespective. Radiographics 1999; 19:783–806.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ariji Y, Kawamata A, Yoshida K, Sakuma S, Nawa H, Fujishita M et al. Three-dimensional morphology of the masseter muscle in patients with mandibular prognathism. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2000;29:113–8.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kitai N, Fujii Y, Murakami S, Furukawa S, Kreiborg S, Takada K. Human masticatory muscle volume and zygomatico-mandibular form in adults with mandibular prognathism. J Dent Res 2002;81:752–6.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Katsumata A, Fujishita M, Ariji Y, Ariji E, Langlais R. 3D CT evaluation of masseter muscle morphology after setback osteotomy for mandibular prognathism. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004;98:461–70.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chan HJ, Woods M, Stella D. Mandibular muscle morphology in growing children with different vertical facial patterns: a 3D-CT study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007 (in press).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Swennen G, Schutyser F. Three-dimensional cephalometry: spiral multi-slice vs cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130:410–6.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Macchi A, Carrafiello G, Cacciafesta V, Norcini A. Threedimensional digital modeling and setup. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:605–10.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Troulis M, Everett P, Seldin E, Kikinis R, Kaban L. Development of a three-dimensional treatment planning system based on computed tomographic data. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;31:349–57.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Girod S, Keeve E, Girod B. Advances in interactive craniofacial surgery planning by 3D simulation and visualization. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;24:120–5.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Xia J, Wang D, Samman N, Yeung R, Tideman H. Computer-assisted three-dimensional surgical planning and simulation: 3D color facial model generation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000;29:2–10.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Katsumata A, Fujishita M, Maeda M, Ariji Y, Ariji E, Langlais R. 3D-CT evaluation of facial asymmetry. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005;99: 212–20.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Papadopoulos M, Christou P, Athanasiou A, Boettcher P, Zeilhofer H, Sader R et al. Three-dimensional craniofacial reconstruction imaging. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002;93:382–93.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jacobs R, Adriansens A, Verstreken K, Suetens P, van Steenberghe D. Predictability of a three-dimensional planning system for oral implant surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999;28:105–11.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cavalcanti M, Ruprecht A, Vannier M. 3D volume rendering using multislice CT for dental implants. Dento-maxillofac Radiol 2002;31:218–23.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Holst S, Blatz M, Eitner S. Precision for computer-guided implant placement: using 3D planning software and fixed intraoral reference points. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65: 393–9.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
van Steenberghe D, Glauser R, Blomback U, Andersson M, Schutyser F, Pettersson A et al. A computed tomographic scan-derived customized surgical template and fixed prosthesis for flapless surgery and immediate loading of implants in fully dentulous maxillae: a prospective multicenter study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;7 Suppl 1:S111–20.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ono I, Ohura T, Narumi E, Kawashima K, Matsuno I, Nakamura S et al. Three-dimensional analysis of craniofacial bones using three-dimensional computer tomography. J CranioMaxillofac Surg 1992;20:49–60.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Salvolini U. Traumatic injuries: imaging of facial injuries. Eur Radiol 2002;12:1253–61.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kawamata A, Fujishita M, Nagahara K, Kanematu N, Niwa K, Langlais R. Three-dimensional computed tomography evaluation of postsurgical condylar displacement after mandibular osteotomy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;85:371–6.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kawamata A, Fujishita M, Ariji Y, Ariji E. Three-dimensional computed tomographic evaluation of morphologic airway changes after mandibular setback osteotomy for prognathism. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;89:278–87.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fairburn S, Waite P, Vilos G, Harding S, Bernreuter W, Cure J et al. Three-dimensional changes in upper airways of patients with obstructive sleep apnea following maxillomandibular advancement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65: 6–12.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Katsumata A, Nojiri M, Fujishita M, Ariji Y, Ariji E, Langlais R. Condylar head remodeling following mandibular setback osteotomy for prognathism: a comparative study of different imaging modalities. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;101:505–14.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gerhard S, Ennemoser T, Rudisch A, Emshoff R. Condylar injury: magnetic resonance imaging findings of temporomandibular joint soft tissue changes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;36:214–8.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sener S, Akganlü F. MRI characteristics of anterior disc displacement with and without reduction. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33:245–52.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hatcher D, Aboudara C. Diagnosis goes digital. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;125:512–5.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Frush D, Donnelly L, Rosen N. Computed tomography and radiation risks: what pediatric health care providers should know. Pediatrics 2003;112:951–7.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wilting J, Zwartkruis A, van Leeuwen M, Timmer J, Kamphuis A, Feldberg M. A rational approach to dose reduction in CT: individualized scan protocols. Eur Radiol 2001;11: 2627–32.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kalra M, Maher M, Toth T, Schmidt B, Westerman B, Morgan H et al. Techniques and applications of automatic tube current modulation for CT. Radiology 2004;233: 649–57.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mupparapu M. Radiation protection guidelines for the practicing orthodontist. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 128:168–72.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mah J, Danforth R, Bumann A, Hatcher D. Radiation absorbed in maxillofacial imaging with a new dental computed tomography device. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;96:508–13.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ngan D, Kharbanda O, Geenty J, Darendeliler M. Comparison of radiation levels from computed tomography and conventional dental radiographs. Aust Orthod J 2003; 19:67–75.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wörtche R, Hassfeld S, Lux C, Müssig E, Hensley F, Krempien R et al. Clinical application of cone beam digital volume tomography in children with cleft lip and palate. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006;35:88–94.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hashimoto K, Arai Y, Iwai K, Araki M, Kawashima S, Terakado M. A comparison of a new limited cone beam computed tomography machine for dental use with a multidetector row helical CT machine. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;95:371–7.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ludlow J, Davies-Ludlow L, Brooks S. Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit. Dento-maxillofac Radiol 2003;32:229–34.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schulze D, Heiland M, Thurmann H, Adam G. Radiation exposure during midfacial imaging using 4- and 16-slice computed tomography, cone beam computed tomography systems and conventional radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33:83–6.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Araki K, Maki K, Seki K, Sakamaki K, Harata Y, Sakaino R et al. Characteristics of a new developed dentomaxillofacial x-ray cone beam CT scanner (CB MercuRayTM): system configuration and physical properties. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33:51–9.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Holberg C, Steinhäuser S, Geis P, Rudzki-Janson I. Conebeam computed tomography in orthodontics: benefits and limitations. J Orofac Orthop 2005;66:434–44.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cohnen M, Kemper J, Möbes O, Pawelzik J, Mödder U. Radiation dose in dental radiology. Eur Radiol 2002;12: 634–7.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rustemeyer P, Streubühr U, Suttmoeller J. Low-dose dental computed tomography: significant dose reduction without loss of image quality. Acta Radiol 2004;45:847–53.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Arai Y, Tammisalo E, Iwai K, Hashimoto K, Shinoda K. Development of a compact computed tomographic apparatus for dental use. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999;28:245–8.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gijbels F, Jacobs R, Bogaerts R, Debaveye D, Verlinden S, Sanderink G. Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part I: patient exposure. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2005;34:145–9.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Covino SW, Mitnick RJ, Shprintzen RJ, Cisneros GJ. The accuracy of measurements of three-dimensional computed tomography reconstructions. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996; 54:982–90. Discussion 990–1.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Articles in this issue

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aoj-2007-0010 | Journal eISSN: 2207-7480 | Journal ISSN: 2207-7472

Journal RSS Feed

Language: English

Page range: 55 - 64

Submitted on: Nov 1, 2006

Accepted on: Mar 1, 2007

Published on: Dec 13, 2023

Published by: Australian Society of Orthodontists Inc.

In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

Related subjects:

Medicine,

Basic medical science,

Basic medical science, other

© 2023 Hong Jin Chan, Michael Woods, Damien Stella, published by Australian Society of Orthodontists Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Volume 23 (2007): Issue 1 (May 2007)