References
- Sarver DM, Proffit WR, Ackerman JL. Diagnosis and treatment planning in orthodontics. In: Graber TM, Vanarsdall RL Jr, eds. Orthodontics, current principles and techniques. St. Louis: Mosby, 2000;3–115.
- Ricketts RM. The biologic significance of the divine proportion and Fibonacci series. Am J Orthod 1982;81:351–70.
- Yamauchi K. Studies on ‘beautiful face’ of Japanese female adult: Part 1: Roentgeno-cephalometric analysis. J Jpn Orthod 1959;18:18–20.
- Iwasawa T, Moro T, Nakamura K. Considerations of the soft tissues of normal occlusal subjects with good face and Tweed triangle. J Jpn Orthod 1974;33:99–104.
- Czarnecki ST, Nanda RS, Currier GF. Perceptions of a balanced facial profile. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993; 104:180–7.
- Miyajima K, McNamara JA, Kimura T, Murata S, Iizuka T. Craniofacial structure of Japanese and European-American adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;110:431–8.
- Ishii K, Yamaki M, Saito I, Kaloust S, Hanada K. WWWbased investigations of profile preferences among Caucasians and Japanese. Orthod Waves 1998;57:425–30.
- Mantzikos T. Esthetic soft tissue profile preferences among the Japanese population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:1–7.
- Holdaway RA. A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning: Part II. Am J Orthod 1984;85:279–93.
- Iwasawa T, Moro T, Nakamura K. Tweed triangle and soft-tissue consideration of Japanese with normal occlusion and good facial profile. Am J Orthod 1977;72:119–27.
- Chen C. Morphological comparison between the more and less acceptable facial appearances in young adults in Taiwan. J Jpn Orthod 1997;56:402–15.
- Yehezkel S, Turley PK. Changes in the African American female profile as depicted in fashion magazines during the 20th century. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;125: 407–17.
- Yamauchi K, Sakuda M. Studies on ‘acceptable face’ of Japanese female adults. Part 2: Photostatic-cephalometric analysis. J Jpn Orthod 1961;20:145–50.
- Shishikura K. The study on measurements of hard and soft tissue by cephalograms – particularly on normal and Class I occlusion among Japanese adults. J Jpn Orthod 1969;28: 263–73.
- Peck H, Peck S. A concept of facial esthetics. Angle Orthod 1957;40:284–317.
- Lines PA, Lines RR, Lines CA. Profilemetrics and facial esthetics. Am J Orthod 1978;73:648–57.
- Ogawa K, Seki N. Buddhist images of Japan. 1st edn. Tokyo: Yama-kei, 2006.
- Alcalde R, Jinno T, Orsini G, Sasaki A, Sugiyama RM, Matsumura T. Soft tissue cephalometric norms in Japanese adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;118:84–9.
- Ioi H, Nakata S, Nakasima A, Counts AL. Anteroposterior lip positions of the most-favored Japanese facial profiles. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:206–11.
- Luppanapornlarp S, Johnston LE. The effects of premolarextraction: a long-term comparison of outcomes in ‘clearcut’ extraction and nonextraction Class II patients. Angle Orthod 1993;63:257–72.
- Scott SH, Johnston LE. The perceived impact of extraction and nonextraction treatments on matched samples of African American patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;116:352–8.
- Bowman SJ, Johnston LE. The esthetic impact of extraction and nonextraction treatments on Caucasian patients. Angle Orthod 2000;70:3–10.
- Jacobson A, Vlachos C. Soft-tisuue evaluation. In: Jacobson A, ed. Radiographic cephalometry. Carol Stream: Quintessence, 1995;239–53.
- Marquardt SR. Dr Stephen R. Marquardt on the golden decagon and human facial beauty. J Clin Orthod 2002;36: 339–47 (Interview).