Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Dental arch shape and size in Malay schoolchildren with Class II malocclusion Cover

Dental arch shape and size in Malay schoolchildren with Class II malocclusion

Open Access
|Dec 2023

References

  1. Bishara SE, Bayati P, Jakobsen JR. Longitudinal comparisons of dental arch changes in normal and untreated Class II Division 1 subjects and their clinical implications. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;110:483–9.
  2. Tollaro I, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Tanasescu CD. Role of posterior transverse interarch discrepancy in Class II Division 1 malocclusion during the mixed dentition phase. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;110:417–22.
  3. McAlarney ME, Chiu WK. Comparison of numeric techniques in the analysis of cleft palate dental arch form change. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1997;34:281–91.
  4. Rohlf FJ, Slice D. Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Syst Zool 1990; 39:40–59.
  5. Singh GD, McNamara JA, Jr., Lozanoff S. Finite element morphometry of the midfacial complex in subjects with Angle’s Class III malocclusions. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol 1997;17:112–20.
  6. Singh GD, Rivera-Robles J, de Jesus-Vinas J. Longitudinal craniofacial growth patterns in patients with orofacial clefts: geometric morphometrics. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2004;41: 136–43.
  7. Singh GD, McNamara JA, Jr., Lozanoff S. Morphometry of the cranial base in subjects with Class III malocclusion. J Dent Res 1997;76:694–703.
  8. Singh GD, McNamara JA, Jr., Lozanoff S. Finite element morphometry of the midfacial complex in subjects with Angle’s Class III malocclusions. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol 1997;17:112–20.
  9. Lozanoff S. Comparison between two finite-element modelling methods for measuring change in craniofacial form. Anat Rec 1990;227:380–6.
  10. Singh GD, McNamara JA, Jr., Lozanoff S. Finite-element morphometry of soft tissues in prepubertal Korean and European-Americans with Class III malocclusions. Arch Oral Biol 1999;44:429–36.
  11. Richtsmeier JT, Cheverud JM. Finite element scaling analysis of human craniofacial growth. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol 1986;6:289–323.
  12. Lele S. Euclidean distance matrix analysis (EDMA) of landmark data: estimation of mean form and mean form difference. Math Geol 1993;25:573–602.
  13. Sayin MO, Turkkahraman H. Comparison of dental arch and alveolar widths of patients with Class II, division 1 malocclusion and subjects with Class I ideal occlusion. Angle Orthod 2004;74:356–60.
  14. Buschang PH, Stroud J, Alexander RG. Differences in dental arch morphology among adult females with untreated Class I and Class II malocclusion. Eur J Orthod 1994;16: 47–52.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aoj-2006-0009 | Journal eISSN: 2207-7480 | Journal ISSN: 2207-7472
Language: English
Page range: 99 - 103
Submitted on: Jan 1, 2006
Accepted on: Jul 1, 2006
Published on: Dec 13, 2023
Published by: Australian Society of Orthodontists Inc.
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2023 Saeed M. Banabilh, Zainul A. Rajion, Rani Samsudin, G. D. Singh, published by Australian Society of Orthodontists Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.