References
- Eberting JJ, Straja SR, Tuncay OC. Treatment time, outcome, and patient satisfaction comparisons of Damon and conventional brackets. Clin Orthod Res 2001;4:228–34.
- Andreasen GF, Quevedo FR. Evaluation of frictional forces in the 0.022 x 0.028 edgewise bracket in vitro. J Biomech 1970;3:151–60.
- Frank CA, Nikolai RJ. A comparative study of frictional resistances between orthodontic bracket and arch wire. Am J Orthod 1980;78:593–609.
- Huffman D, Way DC. A clinical evaluation of tooth movement along archwires of two different sizes. Am J Orthod 1983;83:453–9.
- Peterson L, Spencer R, Andreasen G. A comparison of friction resistance for Nitinol and stainless steel wire in edgewise brackets. Quintessence Int 1982;5:563–71.
- Kusy RP, Whitley JQ, Mayhew MJ, Buckthal JE. Surface roughness of orthodontic arch wire via laser spectroscopy. Angle Orthod 1988;58:33–45.
- Bednar JR, Gruendeman GW, Sandrik JL. A comparative study of frictional forces between orthodontic brackets and arch wires. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;100: 513–22.
- Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, Scribante A, Klersy C, Auricchio F. Evaluation of friction of conventional and metal-insert ceramic brackets in various bracket-archwire combinations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124: 403–9.
- Ireland AJ, Sherriff M, McDonald F. Effect of bracket and wire composition on frictional forces. Eur J Orthod 1991; 13:322–8.
- Kusy RP, Whitley JQ. Frictional resistance of metal-lined ceramic brackets versus conventional stainless steel brackets and development of 3-D friction maps. Angle Orthod 2001; 71:364–74.
- Berger JL. The influence of the SPEED bracket’s self-ligating design on force levels in tooth movement: a comparative in vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;97: 219–28.
- Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, Ricciardi A, Scribante A, Klersy C, Auricchio F. Evaluation of friction of stainless steel and esthetic self-ligating brackets in various bracket-archwire combinations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:395–402.
- Taylor NG, Ison K. Frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and archwires in the buccal segments. Angle Orthod 1996;66:215–22.
- Edwards GD, Davies EH, Jones SP. The ex vivo effect of ligation technique on the static frictional resistance of stainless steel brackets and archwires. Br J Orthod 1995;22:145–53.
- Hain M, Dhopatkar A, Rock P. The effect of ligation method on friction in sliding mechanics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;123:416–22.
- Rock WP, Wilson HJ. The effect of bracket type and ligation method upon forces exerted by orthodontic archwires. Br J Orthod 1989;16:213–7.
- Thorstenson GA, Kusy RP. Effects of ligation type and method on the resistance to sliding of novel orthodontic brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and wet states. Angle Orthod 2003;73:418–30.
- Voudouris JC. Interactive edgewise mechanisms: form and function comparison with conventional edgewise brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;111:119–40.
- Henao SP, Kusy RP. Evaluation of the frictional resistance of conventional and self-ligating bracket designs using standardized archwires and dental typodonts. Angle Orthod 2004;74:202–11.
- Damon DH. The rationale, evolution and clinical application of the self-ligating bracket. Clin Orthod Res 1998;1: 52–61.
- Harradine NW. Self-ligating brackets and treatment efficiency. Clin Orthod Res 2001;4:220–7.
- Miles PG, Weyant RJ, Rustveld L. A clinical trial of Damon 2 vs. conventional twin brackets during initial alignment. Angle Orthod Accepted.
- Little R. The Irregularity Index: a quantitative score of mandibular anterior alignment. Am J Orthod 1975;68: 554–63.
- Pizzoni L, Raunholt G, Melsen B. Frictional forces related to self-ligating brackets. Eur J Orthod 1998;20:283–91.