References
- Pickering EA, Vig P. The occlusal index used to assess orthodontic treatment. Br J Orthod 1975; 2(1): 47–51.
- Berg R, Fredlund A. Evaluation of orthodontic treatment results. Eur J Orthod 1981; 3: 181–5.
- Elderton RJ, Clark JD. Orthodontic treatment in the General Dental Service assessed by the occlusal index. Br J Orthod 1983; 10: 178–86.
- Elderton RJ, Clark JD. An investigation of treatment in the general dental service for patients with Class II division I malocclusions. Br J Orthod 1984; 11: 2–8.
- Richmond S, Shaw WC, Stephens CD, Webb WG, Roberts CT, Andrews M. Orthodontics in the General Dental Service of England and Wales: a critical assessment of standards. Br Dent J 1993; 124: 315–29.
- Richmond S, Andrews M. Orthodontic treatment standards in Norway. Eur J Orthod 1993; 15: 7–15.
- O’Brien KD, Shaw WC, Roberts CT. The use of occlusal indices in assessing the provision of orthodontic treatment by the hospital orthodontic service of England and Wales. Br J Orthod 1993; 20: 23–35.
- O’Brien KD, Robbins R, Vig KWL, Vig PS, Shnorhokian H, Weyant R. The effectiveness of Class II division 1 treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1995; 107: 329–34.
- Fox NA, Richmond S, Wright JL, Daniels CP. Factors affecting the outcome of orthodontic treatment within the General Dental Service. Br J Orthod 1997; 24: 217–21.
- Richmond S, Shaw WC, Roberts CT, Andrews M. The PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): methods to determine outcome of orthodontic treatment in terms of improvements and standards. Eur J Orthod 1992; 14: 180–7.
- Richmond S, Shaw WC, O’Brien KD, Jones R, Stephens CD, Roberts CT, Andrews M. The development of the PAR index (peer assessment rating):reliability and validity. Eur J Orthod 1992; 14:125–39.
- DeGuzman L, Vig KWL, Vig PS, Weyant R J, O’Brien K. The validation of the Peer Assessment Rating index for malocclusion severity and treatment difficulty. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1995; 107: 172–6.
- Vig PS, Weintraub JA, Brown C, Kowalski CJ. The duration of orthodontic treatment with and without extractions: a pilot study of five selected practices. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1990; 97: 45–51.
- Fink DF, Smith RJ. The duration of orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1992; 102: 45–51.
- Amditis C, Smith LF. The duration of fixed orthodontic treatment: a comparison of two groups of patients treated using Edgewise brackets with 0.018” and 0.022” slots. Aust Orthod J 2000;16(1): 34–9.
- Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. Wiley. New York, 1981
- Kerr WJS, McColl JH. Use of the PAR index in assessing the effectiveness of removable orthodontic appliances. Br J Orthod 1993; 20: 351–7.
- Kerr WJS, McColl JH, Fristick L. The use of removable orthodontic appliances in the General Dental Service. Br Dent J 1996; 181: 18–22.
- Birkeland K, Furevik J, Egil Boe O, Wisth PJ. Evaluation of treatment and post-treatment changes by the PAR index. Eur J Orthod 1997; 19: 279–88.
- Robb SI, Sadowsky C, Schneider BJ, BeGole EA. Effectiveness and duration of orthodontic treatment in adults and adolescents. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1998; 113: 383–6.
- Kelly BM, Springate SD. Specialist orthodontics in the General Dental Service. Br Dent J 1996; 180: 209–15.
- Lin WL. A cephalometric appraisal of Chinese adults having normal occlusion and excellent facial types. J Osaka Dent University 1985; 19(1): 1–32.
- Cooke MS, Wei SHY. Cephalometric standards for the southern Chinese. Eur J Orthod 1988; 10: 264–72.