References
- Plunkett DJ. The provision of orthodontic treatment: Some ethical considerations. NZ Dent J 1997 93: 17–20.
- Shaw WC, Gabe MJ, Jones BM. The expectations of orthodontic patients in South Wales and St Louis, Missouri. Br J Orthod 1979; 6: 203–5.
- Gosney MBE. An investigation into some of the factors influencing the desire for orthodontic treatment. Br J Orthod 1986; 13: 87–94.
- Tulloch JFC, Shaw WC, Underhill C, Smith A, Jones G, Jones M. A comparison of attitudes toward orthodontic treatment in British and American communities. Am J Orthod 1984; 85: 253–9.
- Secord PF, Backman CW. Malocclusion and psychological factors. J Am Dent Assoc 1959; 59: 931–8.
- Shaw WC. The influence of children’s dentofacial appearance on their social attractiveness as judged by peers and lay adults. Am J Orthod 1981; 79: 399–415.
- Kerosuo H, Hausen H, Laine T, Shaw WC. The influence of incisal malocclusion on the social attractiveness of young adults in Finland. Eur J Orthod 1995; 17: 505–12.
- Jenny J, Proshek J M. Visibility and prestige of occupations and the importance of dental appearance. J Can Dent Assoc 1986; 52: 987–9.
- Sigall H, Ostrove N. Beautiful but dangerous: Effects of offender attractiveness and nature of the crime on juridic judgement. J Pers Soc Psychol 1975; 31: 410–14.
- Dipboye RL, Fromkin HL, Wiback K. Relative importance of applicant sex, attractiveness, and scholastic standing in evaluation of job applicant surveys. J Appl Psychol 1975; 60: 39–43.
- Cons NC, Jenny J, Kohout FJ. DAI: The Dental Aesthetic Index. Iowa City: University of Iowa, 1986: 95–103.
- Cons NC, Jenny J. Comparing perceptions of dental aesthetics in the USA with those in eleven ethnic groups. Int Dent J 1994; 44: 489–94.
- Cons NC, Jenny J, Kohout FJ, Freer TJ, Eisman D. Perceptions of occlusal conditions in Australia, the German Democratic Republic and the United States of America. Int Dent J 1983; 33: 200–6.
- Keay PA, Freer TJ, Basford KE. Orthodontic treatment need and the Dental Aesthetic Index. Aust Orthod J 1993; 13: 4–7 .
- World Health Organisation. International collaborative study of oral health outcomes (ICSII), Document 2: otal data collection instrument and examination criteria. Geneva: WHO, 1989: 13–27.
- World Health Organisation. Oral Health Surveys: Basic Methods. Geneva: WHO, 4th edn (In press). Cited by Jenny J and Cons NC (1996).
- Crowther P, Harkness M, Herbison P. Orthodontic treatment need in 10-year-old Dunedin schoolchildren. NZ Dent J 1997; 93: 72–8.
- Jenny J, Cons NC. Establishing malocclusion severity levels on the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI) scale. Aust Dent J 1996; 41: 43–6.
- Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; Feb 8: 307-10.
- Bland JM, Altman DG. Comparing two methods of clinical measurement: a personal history. Int J Epidemiol 1995; 24: S7–14.
- Brook PH, Shaw WC. The development of an index of treatment priority. EurJ Orthod 1989; 11: 309–20.
- Otuyemi OD, Jones SP Methods of assessing and grading malocclusion: a review. Aust Orthod J 1995; 14: 21–7.
- Estioko LJ, Wright FAC, Morgan MV. Orthodontic treatment need of secondary schoolchildren in Heidelberg, Victoria: an epidemiological study using the Dental Aesthetic Index. Community Dent Health 1994; 11: 147–51.
- Summers CJ. Some effects of developmental changes on the indices of malocclusion. J Public Health Dent 1966; 26: 212–20.
- McLain JB, Proffit WR. Oral health status in the United States: Prevalence of Malocclusion. J Dent Educ 1985; 49: 386–96.
- Tarvit DJ, Freer TJ. Assessing malocclusion: The time factor. Br J Orthod 1998; 25: 31–4.
- Ansai T, Miyazaki H, Katoh Y, et al. Prevalence of malocclusion in high school students in Japan according to the Dental Aesthetic Index. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1993; 21: 303–5.
- Jenny J, Cons NC, Kohout FJ, Jakobsen J. Predicting handicapping malocclusion using the Dental Aesthetic Index. Int Dent J 1993; 43: 128–32.