Table 1.
Saponin concentration in the examined treatments
| Treatments | CTRL | SR1 | SR2 | SR3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| g/kg of substrate DM | 3.367 | 29.490 | 42.550 | 55.620 |
| mg/mL of rumen fluid | 0.056 | 0.492 | 0.709 | 0.930 |
| Saponin concentration in buffered rumen fluid (%) | 0.0056 | 0.049 | 0.071 | 0.093 |
Table 2.
Ingredients and chemical composition of the basal substrate (CTRL) and soapwort root.
| Basal substrate (CTRL) | Soapwort root | |
|---|---|---|
| Ingredients (g/kg) | ||
| alfalfa | 250 | 0 |
| green grass | 250 | 0 |
| corn grain | 500 | 0 |
| soapwort root | 0 | 1000 |
| dry matter (g/kg) | 551.50 | 925.60 |
| Chemical composition (g/kg DM) | ||
| ether extract (EE) | 28.00 | 3.40 |
| crude protein (CP) | 135.00 | 95.50 |
| crude ash (CA) | 59.20 | 74.65 |
| neutral detergent fibre (NDF) | 521.00 | 236.00 |
| acid detergent fibre (ADF) | 146.75 | 98.20 |
| crude fibre (CF) | 142.85 | 87.70 |
| non-structural carbohydrate (NSC) | 256.80 | 590.45 |
| nitrogen-free extractives (NFE) | 634.95 | 738.75 |
| acid detergent lignin (ADL) | 50.50 | 64.17 |
| cellulose | 96.25 | 33.92 |
| hemicellulose | 372.50 | 135.48 |
| holocellulose | 468.75 | 169.40 |
| saponins | 3.37 | 55.62 |

Figure 1.
The effect of soapwort root supplementation on in vitro gas production kinetics in rumen fluid was assessed using the ANKOM RF Gas Production System over the incubation period. The polynomial regression model (y = Intercept + B1x + B2x2 + B3x3) provided the optimal fit for CTRL and used substrates. CTRL – the basal substrate (25% alfalfa, 25% green grass, 50% corn grain). SR1 – basal substrate supplemented with 29.49 mg/g of saponins; SR2 – basal substrate supplemented with 42.55 mg/g of saponins; SR3 – the powdered root of Saponaria officinalis (soapwort)
Table 3.
The impact of soapwort root supplementation on rumen fluid pH, gas production, CH4 concentration, and hydrogen content in 24 hours of fermentation
| Parameters | CTRL | SR1 | SR2 | SR3 | SEM | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | 6.53 a | 6.46 | 6.47 | 6.45 b | 0.012 | 0.013 |
| GNM (mmol/L) | 87.62 A | 84.93 | 69.23 Bb | 81.05 a | 87.62 | 0.016 |
| CH4 (mmol/L) | 15.76 A | 7.20 | 7.57 B | 5.09 B | 1.035 | 0.001 |
| H2 (%) | 91.50 Aa | 74.20 b | 73.07 b | 65.95 Bb | 2.862 | 0.013 |
| CH4/VFA | 1.26 A | 0.47 Ba | 0.46 Ba | 0.28 Bb | 0.189 | 0.000 |
[i] H2% – hydrogen recovery; VFA – volatile fatty acids; GNM – gas produced in ml/L reduced by CH4 ml/L; SEM – standard error of the mean; CTRL – the basal substrate (25% alfalfa, 25% green grass, 50% corn grain); SR1 – basal substrate supplemented with 29.49 mg/g of saponins; SR2 – basal substrate supplemented with 42.55 mg/g of saponins; SR3 – the powdered root of Saponaria officinalis (soapwort). Values in the same row with different lowercase letters differ significantly (a, b, c, etc.) at P<0.05 and values in the same rows with different capital letters (A, B, C, etc.) differ significantly at P<0.01.
Table 4.
Volatile fatty acids (VFA) concentrations during in vitro rumen fluid fermentation of different substrates
| Parameters | CTRL | SR1 | SR2 | SR3 | SEM | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total VFA1 | 66.03 b | 71.96 | 78.88 | 81.33 a | 2.363 | 0.012 |
| Individual VFA, mol% | ||||||
| Acetic acid | 57.46 a | 55.29 b | 55.79 b | 55.28 b | 0.349 | 0.012 |
| Propionic acid | 27.40 B | 38.47 A | 37.37 A | 36.99 A | 0.896 | 0.001 |
| Isobutyric acid | 0.72 B | 0.36 A | 0.32 A | 0.39 A | 0.042 | 0.002 |
| Butyric acid | 11.83 A | 4.68 Bb | 5.17 Bb | 5.84 Ba | 0.494 | 0.000 |
| Isovaleric acid | 0.85 A | 0.38 B | 0.45 B | 0.42 B | 0.049 | 0.001 |
| Valeric acid | 1.22 Aa | 0.60 b | 0.56 B | 0.81 B | 0.067 | 0.001 |
| Isocaproic acid | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.10 | 0.07 | 0.021 | 0.605 |
| Hexanoic acid | 0.28 a | 0.06 b | 0.18 b | 0.18 b | 0.030 | 0.050 |
1 mmol in the buffered ruminal fluid after fermentation; SEM – standard error of the mean; CTRL – the basal substrate (25% alfalfa, 25% green grass, 50% corn grain); SR1 – basal substrate supplemented with 29.49 mg/g of saponins; SR2 – basal substrate supplemented with 42.55 mg/g of saponins; SR3 – the powdered root of Saponaria officinalis (soapwort). Values in the same row with different lowercase letters differ significantly (a, b, c, etc.) at P<0.05 and values in the same rows with different capital letters (A, B, C, etc.) differ significantly at P<0.01.
Table 5.
The influence of substrates on fermentation parameters
| Parameters | CTRL | SR1 | SR2 | SR3 | SEM | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E1 (%) | 72.3 Bb | 75.37 a | 76.62 A | 77.43 A | 0.511 | 0.001 |
| E2 (%) | 17.66 Aa | 14.56 b | 13.35 B | 12.50 B | 0.516 | 0.001 |
| FE (%) | 77.5 B | 80.70 A | 80.75 A | 81.17 A | 0.291 | 0.001 |
| A:P | 2.14 A | 1.50 B | 1.50 B | 1.45 B | 0.056 | 0.001 |
| P:B | 2.43 A | 6.38 Cb | 7.29 Ab | 8.30 Aa | 0.383 | 0.001 |
| NGR | 2.82 A | 1.78 B | 1.75 B | 1.67 B | 0.087 | 0.001 |
| CY1 | 3.42 Bb | 4.02 | 4.45 A | 4.62 a | 0.139 | 0.011 |
1 g/L of undiluted ruminal fluid; E1 – the efficiency of fermented hexose energy to VFA energy; E2 – CH4 energy; FE – fermentation efficiency; NGR – the ratio of nonglucogenic to glucogenic volatile fatty acids; CY – index of cell yield; SEM – standard error of the mean. CTRL – the basal substrate (25% alfalfa, 25% green grass, 50% corn grain). SR1 – basal substrate supplemented with 29.49 mg/g of saponins; SR2 – basal substrate supplemented with 42.55 mg/g of saponins; SR3 – the powdered root of Saponaria officinalis (soapwort). Values in the same row with different lowercase letters differ significantly (a, b, c, etc.) at P<0.05 and values in the same rows with different capital letters (A, B, C, etc.) differ significantly at P<0.01.
Table 6.
Pearson’s correlation coefficients (R) between fermentation characteristics, volatile fatty acid production, and greenhouse gas emissions
| Variables | GNM | CH4 | H2 | CH4/VFA | Total VFA | Acetic acid | Propionic acid | Isobutyric acid | Butyric acid | Isovaleric acid | Valeric acid | Isocaproic acid | Hexanoic acid | A:P | P:B |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GNM | |||||||||||||||
| CH4 | 0.039 | ||||||||||||||
| H2 | −0.060 | 0.524** | |||||||||||||
| CH4/VFA | −0.022 | 0.953** | 0.589** | ||||||||||||
| Total VFA | −0.047 | 0.034 | −0.004 | −0.222 | |||||||||||
| Acetic acid | −0.058 | 0.399* | −0.476* | 0.393* | −0.235 | ||||||||||
| Propionic acid | −0.130 | −0.795** | −0.022 | −0.795** | 0.273 | −0.732** | |||||||||
| Isobutyric acid | −0.149 | 0.850** | 0.398* | 0.846** | −0.026 | 0.397* | −0.749** | ||||||||
| Butyric acid | 0.256 | 0.780** | 0.230 | 0.778** | −0.249 | 0.410* | −0.914** | 0.702** | |||||||
| Isovaleric acid | 0.063 | 0.871** | 0.287 | 0.811** | 0.037 | 0.471* | −0.797** | 0.851** | 0.747** | ||||||
| Valeric acid | −0.001 | 0.810** | 0.578** | 0.821** | −0.055 | 0.142 | −0.644** | 0.797** | 0.715** | 0.632** | |||||
| Isocaproic acid | 0.208 | −0.165 | −0.215 | −0.104 | −0.297 | 0.086 | −0.042 | −0.160 | 0.013 | −0.021 | −0.259 | ||||
| Hexanoic acid | −0.131 | 0.355* | 0.245 | 0.489* | −0.440* | 0.274 | −0.393* | 0.257 | 0.322 | 0.174 | 0.325 | −0.009 | |||
| A:P | 0.126 | 0.790** | −0.006 | 0.781** | −0.247 | 0.757** | −0.993** | 0.734** | 0.891** | 0.787** | 0.616** | 0.057 | 0.378* | ||
| P:B | −0.204 | −0.762** | −0.217 | −0.776** | 0.281 | −0.445* | 0.901** | −0.716** | −0.957** | −0.745** | −0.706** | 0.081 | −0.358* | −0.859** |
Table 7.
Pearson’s correlation coefficients (R) between calculated fermentation parameters
| Variables | H2 | CH4/VFA | E1 | E2 | A:P | P:B | NGR | FE | CY |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H2 | |||||||||
| CH4/VFA | 0.589* | ||||||||
| E1 | 0.053 | −0.464* | |||||||
| E2 | −0.067 | 0.452* | −1.000** | ||||||
| A:P | −0.006 | 0.781** | −0.592** | 0.588** | |||||
| P:B | −0.217 | −0.776** | 0.559** | −0.554** | −0.859** | ||||
| NGR | 0.057 | 0.785** | −0.585** | 0.582** | 0.988** | −0.907** | |||
| FE | 0.072 | −0.752** | 0.628** | −0.625** | −0.989** | 0.859** | −0.968** | ||
| CY | −0.043 | −0.343* | 0.960** | −0.960** | −0.385* | 0.427* | −0.402* | 0.413* |
