References
- Abdelfattah E., Vezzoli G., Makagon M.M. (2020). On-farm welfare assessment of commercial Pekin duck: a comparison of methods. Poultry Sci., 99: 689‒697.
- AWIN (2015). AWIN welfare assessment protocol for turkeys. Accessed June 2021, from http://air.unimi.it/retrieve/handle/2434/269107/384771/AWINProtocolTurkeys.pdf.
- Baéza E., Guillier L., Petracci M. (2022). Review: Production factors affecting poultry carcass and meat quality attributes. Animal, 16: 100331.
- Benincasa N.C., Sakamoto K.S., da Silva I.J.O., Lobos C.M.V. (2020). Animal welfare: impact of pre-slaughter operations on the current poultry industry. J. Anim. Biometeorol., 8: 104‒110.
- BenSassi N., Averós X., Estevez I. (2019). Broiler chickens on-farm welfare assessment: estimating the robustness of the transect sampling methods. Front. Vet. Sci., 6: 236.
- Biesek J., Banaszak M., Adamski M. (2021). Ducks’ growth, meat quality, bone strength, and jejunum strength depend on zeolite in feed and long-term factors. Animals, 11: 1015.
- Bright A., Jones T.A., Dawkins M.S. (2006). A non-intrusive methods of assessing plumage conditions in commercial flocks of laying hens. Anim. Welf., 15: 113‒118.
- Butterworth A. (2009). Animal welfare indicators and their use in society. In: Welfare of production animals: assessment and management of risks, Smulders H., Algers B. (eds). Food Safety Assurance and Veterinary Public Health: Wageningen Academic Publishers, pp. 371‒389.
- Butterworth A., Mench J.A., Wielebnowski N. (2011). Practical strategies to assess (and improve) welfare. In: Animal Welfare, Appleby M.C., Mench J.A., Olsson I.A.S., Hughes B.O. (eds). CABI Publishing Oxford, pp. 200‒214.
- Byrd C.J., Main R.P., Makagon M.M. (2016). Evaluating Pekin duck walking ability using a treadmill performance test. Poultry Sci., 95: 2244‒2249.
- Campbell D.L.M., Belson S., Erasmus M.A., Lea J.M. (2022). Behavior and welfare impacts of water provision via misting in commercial Pekin ducks. J. Anim. Sci., 100: 1–13.
- Colton S., Fraley G.S. (2014). The effects of environmental enrichment devices on feather picking in commercially housed Pekin ducks. Poultry Sci., 93: 2143‒2150.
- Dawkins M.S. (1999). The role of behavior in the assessment of poultry welfare. World’s Poult. Sci. J., 55: 295‒303.
- DEFRA (2011). Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. Poultry Meat Quality Guide. Available: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/69331/pb13457-poultrymeat-quality-guide.pdf
- Deschutter A., Leeson S. (1986). Feather growth and development. World’s Poult. Sci. J., 42: 259‒267.
- Dong Y., Karcher D.M., Erasmus M.A. (2021). Self- and conspecific-directed pecking behavior of commercial Pekin ducks. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 235: 105223.
- Downing J.A. (2022). Effect of light and stocking density on performance, breast muscle yield and potential damage caused by feather pecking in two strains of commercial Pekin ducks. Anim. Prod. Sci., 62: 870‒879.
- Duan E., Han G., Zhao S., Ma Y., Lv Y., Bai Z. (2023). Regulation of meat duck activeness through photoperiod based on deep learning. Animals, 13: 3520.
- Duggan B.M., Hocking P.M., Schwarz T., Clements D.N. (2015). Differences in hindlimb morphology of ducks and chickens: effects of domestication and selection. Genet. Sel. Evol., 47: 88.
- Duggan B.M., Hocking P.M., Clements D.N. (2016). Gait in ducks (Anas platyrhynchos) and chicken (Gallus gallus) ‒ similarities in adaptation to high growth rate. Biol. Open, 5: 1077‒1085.
- EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Animal Welfare (AHAW Panel), Nilsen S.S., Alvarez J., Bicout D.J., Calistri P., Canali E., Drewe J.A., Garin-Bastuji B., Rojas J.L.G., Schmidt C.G., Herskin M., Michel V., Chueca M.A.M., Padalino B., Roberts H.C., Spoolder H., Stahl K., Viltrop A., Winckler C., Berg C., Edwards S., Knierim U., Riber A., Salamon A., Tiemann I., Fabris C., Manakidou A., Mosbach-Schultz O., der Stede Y.V., Vitali M., Velarde A. (2023). Welfare of ducks, geese and quail on farm. EFSA J., 21: 7992.
- El Sabry M.I., Almasri O. (2013). Global waterfowl production: stocking rate is a key factor for improving productivity and well-being ‒ a review. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 55: 419.
- Eratalar S.A. (2021). The effects of plastic slatted floor and a deep-litter system on growth performance of hybrid Pekin ducks. Arch. Anim. Breed., 64: 1‒6.
- Erdem E., Onbaşilar E.E., Hacan Ö.G. (2015). Effects of 16L:8D photoperiod on growth performance, carcass characteristics, meat composition, and blood parameters of Pekin duck. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 39: 568‒575.
- Ferrante V., Lolli S., Ferrari L., Watanabe T.T.N., Termolada C., Marchewka J., Estevez I. (2018). Differences in prevalence of welfare indicators in male and female turkeys flocks (Melegris gallopavo). Poultry Sci., 98: 1568‒1574.
- Fraley S.M., Fraley G.S., Karcher D.M., Makagon M.M., Lilburn M.S. (2013). Influence of plastic slatted floors compared with pine shaving litter on Pekin duck condition during the summer months. Poultry Sci., 92: 1706‒1711.
- Ghanima M.M.A., El-Hack M.E., Taha A.E., Tufarelli V., Laudadio V., Naiel M.A.E. (2020). Assessment of stocking rate and housing system on performance, carcass traits, blood indices, and meat quality of French Pekin ducks. Agriculture, 10: 273.
- Gontar Ł., Sitarek-Andrzejczyk M., Kochański M., Buła M., Drutowska A., Zych D., Markiewicz J. (2022). Dynamic and diversity of microbial contamination in poultry bedding materials containing parts of medicinal plants. Materials, 15: 1290.
- Granquist E.G., Vasdal G., de Jong I.C., Moe R.O. (2019). Lameness and its relationship with health and production measures in broiler chickens. Animal, 13: 2365‒2372.
- Gustafson L.A., Cheng H.W., Garner J.P., Pajor E.A., Mench J.A. (2007). The effects of different bill-trimming methods on the well-being of Pekin ducks. Poultry Sci., 86: 1831‒1839.
- Hahn G., Judas M., Berk J. (2020). Forced locomotor activity improves walking ability of male turkeys and modifies carcass characteristics. Br. Poult. Sci., 61: 107‒115.
- Hester P.Y., Shea-Moore M. (2003). Beak trimming egg-laying strains of chickens. World’s Poult. Sci. J., 59: 458‒474.
- House G.M., Sobotnik E.B., Nelsen J.R., Arche G.S. (2021 a). Pekin duck productivity, physiological stress, immune response and behavior under 20L:4D and 16L:8D photoperiods. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 240: 105351.
- House G.M., Sobotik E.B., Nelson J.R., Archer G.S. (2021 b). Experimental monochromatic light-emitting diode fixture impacts Pekin duck stress and eye development. Poultry Sci., 100: 101507.
- Hua D., Xue F., Xin H., Zhao Y., Wang Y., Xiong B. (2021). Effects of monochromatic lights on the growth performance, carcass characteristics, eyeball development, oxidation resistance, and cecal bacteria of Pekin ducks. Anim. Biosci., 5: 931‒940.
- Jones T.A., Dawkins M.S. (2010 a). Environmental and management factors affecting Pekin duck production and welfare on commercial farms in UK. Br. Poult. Sci., 51: 12‒21.
- Jones T.A., Dawkins M.S. (2010 b). Effects of environment on Pekin ducks behavior and its correlation with body condition on commercial farms in the UK. Br. Poult. Sci., 51: 319‒325.
- Jones T.A., Waitt, C.D., Dawkins M.S. (2009). Water off a duck’s back: showers and troughs match ponds for improving duck welfare. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 116: 52‒57.
- Karcher D.M., Makong M.M., Fraley S.M., Lilburn M.S. (2013). Influence of raised plastic floors compared with pine shaving litter on environment and Pekin duck condition. Poultry Sci., 92: 583‒590.
- Lee S., Lee I., Yeo U., Kim J., Kim R., Kwon K. (2022). Dynamic energy model of a naturally ventilated duck house and comparative analysis of energy loads according to ventilation type. Biosyst. Eng., 219: 218‒234.
- Liao S.C., Lu P.X., Shen S.Y., Hsiao C.C., Lien C.Y., Wang S.D., Lin T.Y., Tu P.A. (2001). Effects of different swimming pool conditions and floor types on growth performance and footpad dermatitis in indoor-reared white roman geese. Animals, 11: 1705.
- Lourenço-Silva M.I., Almeida Paz I.CL., Chaves G.H.C., Lima Almeida C., Ouros C.C., Lucas Souza S.R., Milbradt E.L., Caldara F.R., Satin A.J.G., Costa G.A., Glavian A.A.G. (2021). Behaviour and animal welfare indicators of broiler chickens housed in an enriched environment. PLoS One, 16: e0256963.
- Makagon M.M., Riber A.B. (2022). Setting research driven duck-welfare standards: a systematic review of Pekin duck welfare research. Poultry Sci., 101: 101614.
- Makagon M.M., Woolley R., Karcher D. (2015). Assessing the waddle: An evaluation of the 3-point gait score for ducks. Poultry Sci., 94: 1729‒1734.
- Marchewka J., Watanabe T.T.N., Ferrante V., Estevez I. (2013). Welfare assessment in broiler farms: transect walks versus individual scoring. Poultry Sci., 92: 2588‒2599.
- Marchewka J., Estevez I., Vezzoli G., Ferrante V., Makagon M.M. (2015). The transect methods: a novel approach to on-farm welfare assessment of commercial turkeys. Poultry Sci., 94: 7‒16.
- Marchewka J., Vasdal G., Moe R.O. (2019). Identifying welfare issues in turkey hen and tom flocks applying the transect walk methods. Poultry Sci., 98: 3391‒3399.
- Marchewka J., Vasdal G., Moe R.O. (2020). Associations between on-farm welfare measures and slaughterhouse data in commercial flocks of turkey hens (Meleagris gallopavo). Poult. Sci., 99: 4123–4131.
- Mohammed H.H., Abdelaty A.I., Saleem A.Y., Youssef M.I., Abdel-Hamid S. (2019). Effect of bedding materials on duck’s welfare and growth performance. Slov. Vet. Res., 56: 149‒156.
- O’Driscoll K.K.M., Broom D.M. (2011). Does access to open water affect the health of Pekin ducks (Anas platyrhynchos)? Poultry Sci., 90: 299–307.
- Oketch E.O., Kim Y.B., Yu M., Hong J.S., Nawarathne S.R., Heo J.M. (2023). Differences in bedding material could alter the growth performance of White Pekin ducks raised for 42 days. J. Anim. Sci. Technol., 65: 377‒386.
- Park M., Britton D., Daley W., McMurray G., Navaei M., Samoylov A., Usher C., Xu J. (2022). Artificial intelligence, sensors, robots, and transportation systems drive an innovative future for poultry broiler and breeder management. Anim. Front., 12: 40‒48.
- Paxton H., Daley M.A., Corr S.A., Hutchinson J.R. (2013). The gait dynamics of the modern broiler chicken: a cautionary tale of selective breeding. J. Exp. Biol., 216: 3237–3248.
- Robinson C.I., Rice M., Makagon M.M., Karcher D.M. (2015). Duck gait: Relationship to hip angle, bone ash, bone density, and morphology. Poultry Sci., 94: 1060‒1067.
- Rodenburg T.B., Bracke M.B.M., Berk J., Cooper J., Faure J.M., Guémené D., Pingel H., Reiter K., Servière J., Ruis M.A.M. (2005). Welfare of ducks in European duck husbandry systems. World’s Poult. Sci. J., 61: 633‒646.
- Shepherd E.M., Fairchild B.D., Ritz C.W. (2017). Alternative bedding materials and litter depth impact litter moisture and footpad dermatitis. J. Appl. Poult. Sci., 26: 518‒528.
- Shin H., Kwak Y., Jo S-K., Kim S-H., Huh J-H. (2023). Development of an optimal mechanical ventilation system control strategy based on weather forecasting data for outdoor air cooling in livestock housing. Energy, 268: 126649.
- Sousa F.C., Tinôco I.F.F., de Silva J.N., Baptista F.J.F., Souza C.F., de Silva A.L. (2017). Gas emission in the poultry production. J. Anim. Behav. Biometeorol., 5: 49‒55.
- Sun D., Xu C., Liu Y., Dai Z., Pan Z., Chen R., Guo R., Chen F., Shi Z., Ying S. (2023). The impact of different relative humidity levels on the production performance, slaughter performance, and meat quality of White Pekin ducks aged 4 to 42 days. Animals, 13: 3711.
- Termotecnica Pericoli (2005). Exhaust Fans for Agricultural and Industrial Applications. Available: https://www.pericoli.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/VENTILATION_E__E.pdf#page=6.
- Van Wyhe R.C., Applegate T.J., Lilburn M.S., Karcher D.M. (2012). A comparison of long bone development in historical and contemporary ducks. Poultry Sci., 91: 2858–2865.
- Xie M., Jiang Y., Tang J., Wen Z.G., Huang W., Hou S.S. (2014). Effects of stocking density on growth performance, carcass traits, and foot pad lesions of White Pekin duck. Poultry Sci., 93: 1644–1648.
- Zeng Q.F., Zhang Q., Chen X., Doster A., Murdoch R., Makagon M., Gardner A., Applegate T.J. (2015). Effects of dietary methio-nine content on growth performance, carcass traits, and feather growth of Pekin duck from 15 to 35 days of age. Poultry Sci., 94: 1592‒1599.
- Zheng H., Zhang T., Cheng F., Zeng J., Yang X. (2021). Design and implementation of poultry farming information management system based on cloud database. Animals, 11: 900.
- Zhu Y.W., Xie M., Huang W., Yang L., Hou S.S. (2013). Effects of biotin on growth performance and foot pad dermatitis of starter White Pekin ducklings. Br. Poult. Sci., 53: 646‒650.
- Zuowei S., Yan L., Yuan L., Jiao H., Song Z., Guo Y., Lin H. (2011). Stocking density affects the growth performance of broilers in a sex-dependent fashion. Poultry Sci., 90: 1406–1415.