From Animal Personality to Animal Individuality in Farm Animals – A Review
References
- Adamczyk K. (2018). Dairy cattle welfare as a result of human-animal relationship – a review. Ann. Anim. Sci., 18: 601–622.
- Adamczyk K., Gil Z., Felenczak A., Skrzyński G., Zapletal P., Choroszy Z. (2011). Relationship between milk yield of cows and their 24-hour walking activity. Anim. Sci. Pap. Rep., 29: 185–195.
- Adamczyk K., Pokorska J., Makulska J., Earley B., Mazurek M. (2013). Genetic analysis and evaluation of behavioural traits in cattle. Livest. Sci., 154: 1–12.
- Adrion F., Kapun A., Eckert F., Holland E.M., Staiger M., Götz S., Gallmann E. (2018). Monitoring trough visits of growing-finishing pigs with UHF-RFID. Comput. Electron. Agricult., 144: 144–153.
- Akhigbe B.I., Munir K., Akinade O., Akanbi L., Oyedele L.O. (2021). IoT technologies for livestock management: a review of present status, opportunities, and future trends. Big Data Cogn. Comput., 5: 10.
- Alhamada M., Debus N., Lurette A., Bocquier F. (2016). Validation of automated electronic oestrus detection in sheep as an alternative to visual observation. Small Rum. Res., 134: 97–104.
- Amiot C.E., Bastian B. (2015). Toward a psychology of human-animal relations. Psychol. Bull., 141: 6.
- Andrews K. (2020). Ethical implications of animal personhood and the role for science. Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics, XXII, 1: 13–32.
- Ashton M.C., Lee K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev., 11: 150–166.
- Aydin A. (2016). Precision feeding in laying hens by sound technology. J. Tekird. Agricult. Facult., 13: 3.
- Babst G.A. (2011). Moral community. In: Encyclopedia of global justice, Chatterjee D.K. (ed.). Dordrecht, Deutschland, Springer, pp. 710–711.
- Battini M., Agostini A., Mattiello S. (2019). Understanding cows’ emotions on farm: are eye white and ear posture reliable indicators? Animals, 9: 477.
- Bentham J. (1789/1996). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham, Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press, 456 pp.
- Benton T. (2009). Darwin and Wallace as environmental philosophers. Environ. Values, 18: 487–502.
- Benus R.F., Koolhaas J.M., Oortmerssen G.A.V. (1987). Individual differences in behavioural reaction to a changing environment in mice and rats. Behaviour, 100: 105–121.
- Bermúdez J.L. (2011). Mindreading and moral significance in non-human animals. In: Handbook to animal ethics, Beauchamp T.L., Frey R.G. (eds). Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press, pp. 407–440.
- Bouissou M.F., Boissy A., Le Neindre P., Veissier I. (2001). The social behaviour of cattle. In: Social behaviour in farm animals, Keeling L.J., Gonyou H.W. (eds). Cambridge, USA CAB International, pp. 113–145.
- Boyland N.K., James R., Mlynski D.T., Madden J. R., Croft D.P. (2013). Spatial proximity loggers for recording animal social networks: consequences of inter-logger variation in performance. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 67: 1877–1890.
- Broom D.M. (2006). The evolution of morality. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 100: 20–28.
- Buller H. (2013). Individuation, the mass and farm animals. Theory, Culture Society, 30: 155–175.
- Buskell A. (2022). Cumulative culture and complex cultural traditions. Mind Lang., 37: 284–303.
- Cabrera D., Nilsson J.R., Griffen B.D. (2021). The development of animal personality across ontogeny: a cross-species review. Anim. Behav., 173: 137–144.
- Callicott J.B. (1989). In defense of the land ethic: essays in environmental philosophy. New York, USA, State University of New York Press, 336 pp.
- Camerlink I., Turner S.P., Farish M., Arnott G. (2017). The influence of experience on contest assessment strategies. Sci. Rep., 7: 14492.
- Camerlink I., Farish M., D’Eath R.B., Arnott G., Turner S.P. (2018). Long term benefits on social behaviour after early life socialization of piglets. Animals, 8: 192.
- Camerlink I., Turner S.P., Farish M., Arnott G. (2019). Advantages of social skills for contest resolution. R. Soc. Open Sci., 6: 181456.
- Camerlink I., Chou J.Y., Turner S.P. (2020). Intra-group lethal gang aggression in domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus). Animals, 10: 1287.
- Capitanio J.P., Widaman K.F. (2005). Confirmatory factor analysis of personality structure in adult male rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Am. J. Primatol., 65: 289–294.
- Carpentier L., Berckmans D., Youssef A., Berckmans D., van Water-schoot T., Johnston D., Ferguson N., Earley B., Fontana I., Tullo E., Guarino M., Vranken E., Norton T. (2018). Automatic cough detection for bovine respiratory disease in a calf house. Biosyst. Eng., 173: 45–56.
- Carpentier L., Vranken E., Berckmans D., Paeshuyse J., Norton T. (2019). Development of sound-based poultry health monitoring tool for automated sneeze detection. Comp. Electr. Agricult., 162, 573–581.
- Carruthers P. (1992). The animals issue: moral theory in practice. Cambridge, USA, Cambridge University Press, 206 pp.
- Cartwright J. (2000). Evolution and human behavior: Darwinian perspectives on human nature. Mendham, Suffolk, UK, MIT Press, Aardvark Editorial, 376 pp.
- Cavalieri P. (2003). The animal question: why nonhuman animals deserve human rights, Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press, 192 pp.
- Chelotti J.O., Vanrell S.R., Milone D.H., Utsumi S.A., Galli J.R., Rufiner H.L., Giovanini L.L. (2016). A real-time algorithm for acoustic monitoring of ingestive behavior of grazing cattle. Comp. Electr. Agricult., 127: 64–75.
- Chen C., Zhu W., Liu D., Steibel J., Siegford J., Wurtz K., Han J., Norton T. (2019). Detection of aggressive behaviours in pigs using a RealSence depth sensor. Comp. Electr. Agricult., 166: 105003.
- Chen C., Zhu W., Norton T. (2021). Behaviour recognition of pigs and cattle: Journey from computer vision to deep learning. Comput. Electron. Agric., 187: 106255.
- Chopra K., Hodges H.R., Barker Z.E., Diosdado J.A.V. (2020). Proximity interactions in a permanently housed dairy herd: network structure, consistency, and individual differences. Front. Vet. Sci., 7: 583715.
- Clarke S., Zohny H., Savulescu J. (2021). Rethinking moral status. Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press, 352 pp.
- Corbet N.J., Patison K. P., Menzies D.J., Swain D.L. (2018). Using temporal associations to determine postpartum oestrus in tropical beef cows. Anim. Product. Sci., 58: 1465–1469.
- Coulon M., Baudoin C., Heyman Y., Deputte B.L. (2011). Cattle discriminate between familiar and unfamiliar conspecifics by using only head visual cues. Anim. Cogn., 14: 279–290.
- D’Eath R.B., Jack M., Futro A., Talbot D., Zhu Q., Barclay D., Baxter E.M. (2018). Automatic early warning of tail biting in pigs: 3D cameras can detect lowered tail posture before an outbreak. PLoS ONE, 13: 194524.
- De Waal F., Macedo S.E., Ober J.E. (2006). Primates and philosophers. How morality evolved. Princeton and Oxford, UK, Princeton University Press, 232 pp.
- De Waal F.B.M., Churchland P.S., Pievani T., Parmigiani S. (2014). Evolved morality: the biology and philosophy of human conscience. Behaviour, 151: 137–141.
- DeGrazia D. (2002). Animal rights: a very short introduction. Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press, 131 pp.
- Donaldson S., Kymlicka W. (2011). Zoopolis: a political theory of animal rights. Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press, 329 pp.
- Dufourcq A. (2021). The imaginary of animals. London, UK, Rout-ledge, 1st Edition, 280 pp.
- Fan B., Bryant R., Greer A. (2022). Behavioral fingerprinting: acceleration sensors for identifying changes in livestock health. J., 5: 435–454.
- Farm Animal Welfare Council (FAWC) (2009). Farm animal welfare in Great Britain: past, present and future. London, UK, (source: http://www.fawc.org.uk).
- Fast L.A., Funder D.C. (2008). Personality as manifest in word use: correlations with self-report, acquaintance report and behavior. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 94: 334–346.
- Fernandes D.P.B., da Silva I.J.O., Nazareno A.C., Donofre A.C. (2015). Farm animals’s cognition and the tests used on its evaluation. J. Anim. Behav. Biometeorol., 3: 9–19.
- Finkemeier M-A., Langbein J., Puppe B. (2018). Personality research in mammalian farm animals: concepts, measures, and relationship to welfare. Front. Vet. Sci., 5: 131.
- Foris B., Thompson A., von Keyserlingk M., Melzer N., Weary D. (2019). Automatic detection of feeding- and drinking-related agonistic behavior and dominance in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 102: 9176–9186.
- Forkosh O. (2021). Animal behavior and animal personality from a non-human perspective: getting help from the machine. Patterns, 2: 100194.
- Francione G.L. (2008). Animals as persons: essays on the abolition of animal exploitation. New York, USA, Columbia University Press, 256 pp.
- Fraser D. (2012). Animal ethics and food production in the twenty-first century. In: The philosophy of food, Kaplan D.M. (ed.). Berkeley, USA, University of California Press, pp. 190–213.
- Frondelius L., Järvenranta K., Koponen T., Mononen J. (2015). The effects of body posture and temperament on heart rate variability in dairy cows. Physiol. Behav., 139: 437–441.
- Gartner M.C. (2015). Pet personality: a review. Pers. Individ. Differ., 75: 102–113.
- Gilbert B. (2022). The problem of anthropocentrism and the human kind of personhood. Philos. Soc. Crit.: 01914537221110900.
- Gosling S.D. (2001). From mice to men: what can we learn about personality from animal research? Psychol. Bull., 127: 45–86.
- Gosling S.D., John O.P. (1999). Personality dimensions in nonhuman animals: a cross-species review. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci., 8: 69–75.
- Gosling S.D., Vazire S. (2002). Are we barking up the right tree? Evaluating the comparative approach to personality. J. Res. Pers., 36: 607–614.
- Gosling S.D. (2008). Personality in non-human animals. Soc. Pers. Psychol. Compass, 2/2: 985–1001.
- Goursot C., Düpjan S., Kanitz E., Tuchscherer A., Puppe B., Leliveld L.M.C. (2019). Assessing animal individuality: links between personality and laterality in pigs. Curr. Zool., 65: 541–551.
- Grandin T. (2021). The visual, auditory, and physical environment of livestock handling facilities and its effect on ease of movement of cattle, pigs, and sheep. Front. Anim. Sci., 2: 744207.
- Gray K., Young L., Waytz A. (2012). Mind perception is the essence of morality. Psychol. Inq., 23: 2.
- Green A., Clark C., Favaro L., Lomax S., Reby D. (2019). Vocal individuality of Holstein-Friesian cattle is maintained across putatively positive and negative farming contexts. Sci. Rep., 9: 18468.
- Guzhva O., Ardö H., Herlin A., Nilsson M., Åström K., Bergsten C. (2016). Feasibility study for the implementation of an automatic system for the detection of social interactions in the waiting area of automatic milking stations by using a video surveillance system. Comp. Electr. Agricult., 127: 506–509.
- Gygax L., Nawroth C. (2019). Farm animals are not humans in sheep clothing. Commentary on Marino & Merskin on sheep complexity. Anim. Sentience, 237.
- Hagen K., Broom D.M. (2004). Emotional reactions to learning in cattle. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 85: 203–213.
- Halachmi I., Guarino M. (2016). Editorial: precision livestock farming: a ‘per animal’ approach using advanced monitoring technologies. Animal, 10: 1482–1483.
- Hemsworth P.H. (2018). Key determinants of pig welfare: implications of animal management and housing design on livestock welfare. Anim. Prod. Sci., 58: 1375–1386.
- Hemsworth P.H., Coleman G.J. (2011). Human-livestock interactions: the stockperson and the productivity of intensively farmed animals. 2nd ed. Wallingford, UK, CABI, 194 pp.
- Herbeck Y.E., Eliava M., Grinevich V., MacLean E.L. (2022). Fear, love, and the origins of canid domestication: An oxytocin hypothesis. Compr. Psychoneuroendocrinol., 9: 100100.
- Hessing M.J.C., Hagelso A.M., Schouten W.G.P., Wiepkema P.R., Van Beek J.A.M. (1994). Individual behavioral and physiological strategies in pigs. Physiol. Behav., 55: 39–46.
- Islam M.A., Lomax S., Doughty A.K., Islam M.R., Thomson P.C., Clark C.E.F. (2021). Revealing the diversity in cattle behavioural response to high environmental heat using accelerometer-based ear tag sensors. Comput. Electron. Agric., 191: 106511.
- Iversen M., Bolhuis J., Camerlink I., Ursinus W., Reimert I., Duijvesteijn N. (2017). Heritability of the backtest response in piglets and its genetic correlations with production traits. Animal, 11: 556–563.
- Johnsen J.F., Zipp K.A., Kälber T., Passillé A.M. de, Knierim U., Barth K., Mejdell C.M. (2016). Is rearing calves with the dam a feasible option for dairy farms? – Current and future research. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 181: 1–11.
- Kaiser M.I., Müller C. (2021). What is an animal personality? Biol. Philos., 36: 1.
- Kant I. (1797/2017). The metaphysics of morals. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press, 308 pp.
- Kashiha M., Bahr C., Haredasht S.A., Ott S., Moons C.P.H., Niewold T.A., Ödberg F.O., Berckmans D.. (2013). The automatic monitoring of pigs water use by cameras. Comput. Electron. Agric., 90: 164–169.
- King J.E., Weiss A., Sisco M.M. (2008). Aping humans: age and sex effects in chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) and human (Homo sapiens) personality. J. Comp. Psychol., 122: 418–427.
- Ko H.L., Chong Q., Escribano D., Camerlink I., Manteca X., Llonch P. (2020). Pre-weaning socialization and environmental enrichment affect life-long response to regrouping in commercially-reared pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 229: 105044.
- Koski S.E. (2011). How to measure animal personality and why does it matter? Integrating the psychological and biological approaches to animal personality. In: From genes to animal behavior. Social structures, personalities, communication by color, Inoue-Murayama M., Kawamura S., Weiss A. (eds). Tokyo, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York, Japan, Nederland, Deutschland, UK, USA, Springer, pp. 115–136.
- Kralj-Fišer S., Schuett W. (2014). Studying personality variation in invertebrates: why bother? Anim. Behav., 91: 41–52.
- Kremer L., Bus J.D., Webb L.E., Bokkers E.A.M., Engel B., van der Werf J.T.N., Schnabel S.K., van Reenen C.G. (2021). Housing and personality effects on judgement and attention biases in dairy cows. Sci. Rep., 11: 22984.
- Kumar S., Singh S.K. (2020). Cattle recognition: a new frontier in visual animal biometrics research. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., India, Sect. A Phys. Sci., 90: 689–708.
- Leach H.M. (2003). Human domestication reconsidered. Curr. Anthropol., 44: 349–368.
- Lee H.-J., Roberts S.J., Drake K.A., Dawkins M.S. (2011). Prediction of feather damage in laying hens using optical flows and Markov models. J. Roy. Soc. Interface, 8: 489–499.
- Lee J., Jin L., Park D., Chung Y. (2016). Automatic recognition of aggressive behavior in pigs using a kinect depth sensor. Sensors, 16: 631.
- Lee J., Noh B., Jang S., Park D., Chung Y., Chang H.H. (2015). Stress detection and classification of laying hens by sound analysis. Asian-Austral. J. Anim. Sci., 28: 592–598.
- Leopold A. (1949/1987). A sand county almanac. Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press, 226 pp.
- Li L., Zhao Y., Oliveira J., Verhoijsen W., Liu K., Xin H. (2017). A UHF RFID system for studying individual feeding and nesting behaviors of group-housed laying hens. Trans. ASABE, 60: 1337–1347.
- Liu L.S., Ni J.Q., Zhao R.Q., Shen M.X., He C.L., Lu M.Z. (2018). Design and test of a low-power acceleration sensor with Bluetooth Low Energy on ear tags for sow behaviour monitoring. Biosyst. Eng., 176: 162–171.
- Luu J., Johnsen J F., de Passillé A.M., de Rushen J. (2013). Which measures of acceleration best estimate the duration of locomotor play by dairy calves? Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 148: 21–27.
- Mainau E., Dalmau A., Ruiz-de-la-Torre J.L., Manteca X. (2009). Validation of an automatic system to detect position changes in puerperal sows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 121: 96–102.
- Maltby J., Day L., Macaskill A. (2010). Personality, individual differences and intelligence. Harlow, UK, Pearson Education, 2nd ed., 675 pp.
- Mandel R., Whay H.R., Klement E., Nicol C.J. (2016). Invited review: environmental enrichment of dairy cows and calves in indoor housing. J. Dairy Sci., 99: 1695–1715.
- Manteuffel C., Hartung E., Schmidt M., Hoffmann G., Schön P.C. (2015). Towards qualitative and quantitative prediction and detection of parturition onset in sows using light barriers. Comp. Electr. Agricult., 116: 201–210.
- Marino L. (2017). Thinking chickens: A review of cognition, emotion, and behavior in the domestic chicken. Anim. Cogn., 20: 127–147.
- Marino L., Merskin D. (2019). Intelligence, complexity, and individuality in sheep. Anim. Sentience, 206: 1–26.
- Marino L., Allen K. (2017). The psychology of cows. Anim. Behav. Cogn., 4: 474–498.
- Marino L., Colvin C.M. (2015). Thinking pigs: a comparative review of cognition, emotion, and personality in Sus domesticus. International J. Comp. Psychol., 28.
- Maselyne J., Adriaens I., Huybrechts T., de Ketelaere B., Millet S., Vangeyte J., van Nuffel A., Saeys W. (2016 a). Measuring the drinking behaviour of individual pigs housed in group using radio frequency identification (RFID). Animal, 10: 1557–1566.
- Maselyne J., Saeys W., Briene P., Mertens K., Vangeyte J., De Ketelaere B., Hessel E.F., Sonck B., Van Nuffel A. (2016 b). Methods to construct feeding visits from RFID registrations of growing-finishing pigs at the feed trough. Comp. Electr. Agricult., 128: 9–19.
- Mather J.A., Carere C. (2019). Consider the individual: personality and welfare in invertebrates. In: The welfare of invertebrate animals. Animal welfare, Carere C., Mather J. (eds). Cham, Switzerland, Springer, pp. 229–245.
- McCrae R.R., Costa P.T. Jr. (2008). The five-factor theory of personality. In: Handbook of personality: theory and research, John O.P., Robins R.W., Pervin L.A. (eds). New York, USA, Guilford Press, 3rd ed., pp. 159–181.
- McLennan K., Mahmoud M. (2019). Development of an automated pain facial expression detection system for sheep (Ovis aries). Animals, 9: 1–7.
- Meagher R.K., Strazhnik E., von Keyserlingk M.A.G., Weary D.M. (2020). Assessing the motivation to learn in cattle. Sci. Rep., 10: 6847.
- Mellor D.J., Beausoleil N.J., Littlewood K.E., McLean A.N., Mc-Greevy P.D., Jones B., Wilkins C. (2020). The 2020 Five Domains Model: including human–animal interactions in assessments of animal welfare. Animals, 10: 1870.
- Melotti L., Oostindjer M., Bolhuis J.E., Held S., Mendl M. (2011). Coping personality type and environmental enrichment affect aggression at weaning in pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 133: 144–153.
- Monsó S. (2017). Morality without mindreading. Mind Lang., 32: 338–357.
- Morgan T., Pluske J., Miller D., Collins T., Barnes A.L., Wemelsfelder F., Fleming P.A. (2014). Socialising piglets in lactation positively affects their post-weaning behaviour. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 158: 23–33.
- Mota-Rojas D., Broom D.M., Orihuela A., Velarde A., Napolitano F., Alonso-Spilsbury M. (2020). Effects of human-animal relationship on animal productivity and welfare. J. Anim. Behav. Biometeorol., 8: 196–205.
- Nasirahmadi A., Hensel O., Edwards S., Sturm B. (2016). Automatic detection of mounting behaviours among pigs using image analysis. Comp. Electr. Agricult., 124: 295–302.
- Navon S., Mizrach A., Hetzroni A., Ungar E.D. (2013). Automatic recognition of jaw movements in free-ranging cattle, goats and sheep, using acoustic monitoring. Biosyst. Eng., 114: 474–483.
- Nawroth C., Langbein J., Coulon M., Gabor V., Oesterwind S., Benz-Schwarzburg J., von Borell E. (2019). Farm animal cognition – linking behavior, welfare and ethics. Front. Vet. Sci., 6: 24.
- Neave H., Weary D., von Keyserlingk M. (2018). Review: individual variability in feeding behaviour of domesticated ruminants. Animal, 12: S419-S430.
- Neethirajan S. (2020). The role of sensors, big data and machine learning in modern animal farming. Sens. Bio-Sens. Res., 29: 100367.
- Neethirajan S., Reimert I., Kemp B. (2021). Measuring farm animal emotions – sensor-based approaches. Sensors, 21: 553.
- Noddings N. (1984). Caring: a feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley – Los Angeles, USA, University of California Press, 216 pp.
- Nogues E., Lecorps B., Weary D.M., von Keyserlingk M.A.G. (2020). Individual variability in response to social stress in dairy heifers. Animals, 10: 1440.
- Norris D., Ng‘ambi J.W., Mabelebele M., Alabi O.J., Benyi K. (2014). Genetic selection for docility: a review. J. Anim. Plant Sci., 24: 13–18.
- Nowicki J., Klocek C., Schwarz T. (2012). Factors affecting maternal behaviour and responsiveness in sows during periparturient and lactation periods. Ann. Anim. Sci., 12: 455–469.
- Nowicki J., Schwarz T. (2010). Maternal responsiveness of sows housed in two farrowing environments measured in behavioural tests. Ann. Anim. Sci., 10: 179–186.
- Nussbaum M. (2006). Frontiers of justice disability, nationality, species membership. Cambridge, USA, Harward University Press, 512 pp.
- Okinda C., Lu M., Nyalala I., Li J., Shen M. (2018). Asphyxia occur-rence detection in sows during the farrowing phase by inter-birth interval evaluation. Comp. Electr. Agricult., 152: 221–232.
- O’Malley C., Turner S.P., D’Eath R.B., Steibel J., Bates R., Ernst C., Siegford J. (2019). Animal personality in the management and welfare of pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 218: 104821.
- Paraforos D.S., Griepentrog H.W. (2021). Digital farming and field robotics: internet of things, cloud computing, and Big Data. In: Fundamentals of agricultural and field robotics. Agriculture automation and control, Karkee M., Zhang Q. (eds). Cham, Switzerland, Springer, pp. 365–385.
- Pastell M., Hietaoja J., Yun J., Tiusanen J., Valros A. (2016). Predicting farrowing of sows housed in crates and pens using accelerometers and CUSUM charts. Comp. Electr. Agricult., 127: 197–203.
- Paul E.S., Harding E.J., Mendl M. (2005). Measuring emotional processes in animals: the utility of a cognitive approach. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 29: 469–491.
- Peden R.S., Turner S.P., Boyle L.A., Camerlink I. (2018). The translation of animal welfare research into practice: the case of mixing aggression between pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 204: 1–9. Phillips C. (2019). Sacrificial lambs. Anim. Sent., 25.
- Pitts A.D., Weary D.M., Pajor E.A., Fraser D. (2000). Mixing at young ages reduces fighting in unacquainted domestic pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 68: 191–197.
- Pollo S. (2007). Animal welfare, animal minds and animal individuality. In: Course. Human and non-human animals interaction: contextual, normative and applicative aspects, Vitale A., Laviola G., Manciocco A., Adriani W. (eds). Roma, Italy, Rapporti ISTISAN 07/40, pp. 95–101.
- Prunier A., Averos X., Dimitrov I., Edwards S.A., Hillmann E., Holinger M., Ilieski V., Leming R., Tallet C., Turner S.P., Zupan M., Camerlink I. (2020). Review: early life predisposing factors for biting in pigs. Animal, 14: 570–587.
- Quwaider M., Daigle C.L., Biswas S.K., Siegford J.M., Swanson J.C. (2010). Development of a wireless body-mounted sensor to monitor location and activity of laying hens in a non-cage housing system. Trans. ASABE., 53: 1705–1713.
- Ramsey G. (2013). Culture in humans and other animals. Biol. Philos., 28: 457–479.
- Rasmuson M. (2010). Trends in genetics – before the Molecular Era. Hereditas, 147: 243–249.
- Rault J.-L., Waiblinger S., Boivin X., Hemsworth P. (2020). The power of a positive human–animal relationship for animal welfare. Front. Vet. Sci., 7.
- Ravisankar H., Naidu V.S.G.R, Sivaraju K., Babu B.J., Sivarao P. (2014). Expert system for dairy cattle management. Indian J. Anim. Sci., 84: 891–896.
- Réale D., Reader S.M., Sol D., McDougall P.T., Dingemanse N.J. (2007). Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution. Biol. Rev., 82: 291–318.
- Regan T. (1983). The case for animals rights. Berkeley, Los Angeles, USA, University of California Press, 474 pp.
- Regan T. (2006). Sentience and rights. In: Animals, Ethics and Trade, Turner J., D’Silva J. (eds). Routledge, 1st Edition, New York, USA, pp. 79–86.
- Rodriguez-Baena D.S., Gomez-Vela F.A., García-Torres M., Divina F., Barranco C.D., Daz-Diaz N., Jimenez M., Montalvo G. (2020). Identifying livestock behavior patterns based on accelerometer dataset. J. Comput. Sci., 41: 101076.
- Roland L., Lidauer L., Sattlecker G., Kickinger F., Auer W., Sturm V., Efrosinin D., Drillich M., Iwersen M. (2018). Monitoring drinking behavior in bucket-fed dairy calves using an ear-attached tri-axial accelerometer: a pilot study. Comp. Electr. Agricult., 145: 298–301.
- Rossi J., Garner S.A. (2014). Industrial farm animal production: a comprehensive moral critique. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics, 27: 479–522. Röttgen V., Schön P.C., Becker F., Tuchscherer A., Wrenzycki C.,
- Düpjan S., Puppe B. (2020). Automatic recording of individual oestrus vocalisation in group-housed dairy cattle: development of a cattle call monitor. Animal, 14: 198–205.
- Rowlands M. (2012). Can animals be moral? New York, USA, Oxford University Press, 272 pp.
- Rowlands M. (2016). Consciousness and the unity of mind. Anim. Sentience, 10: 1–15.
- Ruis M.A.W., te Brake J.H.A., van de Burgwal J.A., de Jong I.C., Blokhuis H.J., Koolhaas J.M. (2000). Personalities in female domesticated pigs: behavioural and physiological indications. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 66: 31–47.
- Salazar L.C., Ko H.L., Yang C.H., Llonch L., Manteca X., Camerlink I., Llonch P. (2018). Early socialisation as a strategy to increase piglets’ social skills in intensive farming conditions. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 206: 25–31.
- Schillings J., Bennett R., Rose D.C. (2021). Exploring the potential of precision livestock farming technologies to help address farm animal welfare. Front. Anim. Sci., 2: 639678.
- Schön P.C., Puppe B., Manteuffel G. (2004). Automated recording of stress vocalisations as a tool to document impaired welfare in pigs. Anim. Welfare, 13: 105–110.
- Schönfeld M. (2006). Animal consciousness: paradigm change in the life sciences. Perspect. Sci., 14: 354–381.
- Schweitzer A. (1955). Civilization and ethics. London, UK, Adam & Charles Black, XXVIII, 284 pp.
- Shahzadi R., Ferzund J., Tausif M., Suryani M.A. (2016). Internet of things based expert system for smart agriculture. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., 7: 341–350.
- Shapiro P. (2006). Moral agency in other animals. Theor. Med. Bioeth., 27: 357–373.
- Sih A., Bell A., Johnson J.C. (2004 a). Behavioral syndromes: anecological and evolutionary overview. Trends Ecol. Evol., 19: 372–378.
- Sih A., Bell A.M., Johnson J.C., Ziemba R.E. (2004 b). Behavioral syndromes: an integrative overview. Q. Rev. Biol., 79: 241–277.
- Simitzis P., Tzanidakis C., Tzamaloukas O., Sossidou E. (2022). Contribution of precision livestock farming systems to the Improvement of welfare status and productivity of dairy animals. Dairy, 3: 12–28.
- Singer P. (1975). Animal liberation: a new ethics for our treatment of animals. New York, USA, HarperCollins, 311 pp.
- Singer P. (1981). The expanding circle: ethics and sociobiology. Oxford, UK, Clarendon Press, 208 pp.
- Singer P. (2011). Practical ethics. New Jersey, USA, Princeton University, 3rd ed., 356 pp.
- Slater P.J.B. (1981). Individual differences in animal behavior. In: Perspectives in Ethology, Advantages of Diversity, Bateson P.P.G., Klopfer P. (eds). Plenum Press, New York, USA, pp. 35–49.
- Solomon T., Hussen E. (2018). Benefits of farm animals genetic adaptation: a review. Eur. Exp. Biol., 8: 22.
- Sorabji R. (2018). Animal minds and human morals. New York, USA, Cornell University Press, 272 pp.
- Steiner G. (2008). Animals and the moral community. New York, USA, Columbia University Press, 232 pp.
- Swain D.L., Bishop-Hurley G.J. (2007). Using contact logging devices to explore animal affiliations: quantifying cow-calf interactions. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 102: 1–11.
- Sytsma J., Machery E. (2012). The two sources of moral standing. Rev. Phil. Psych., 3: 303–324.
- Thompson R., Matheson S.M., Plötz T., Edwards S.A., Kyriazakis I. (2016). Porcine lie detectors: automatic quantification of posture state and transitions in sows using inertial sensors. Comp. Electr. Agricult., 127: 521–530.
- Torrance S. (2013). Artificial agents and the expanding ethical circle. AI Soc., 28: 399–414.
- Tu X., Du S., Tang L., Xin H., Wood B. (2011). A real-time automated system for monitoring individual feed intake and body weight of group housed turkeys. Comp. Electr. Agricult., 75: 313–320.
- Van Der Sluis M., De Klerk B., Ellen E.D., De Haas Y., Hijink T., Rodenburg T.B. (2019). Validation of an ultra-wideband tracking system for recording individual levels of activity in broilers. Animals, 9: 580.
- Vayssade J.A., Arquet R., Bonneau M. (2019). Automatic activity tracking of goats using drone camera. Comp. Electr. Agricult., 162: 767–772.
- Viazzi S., Ismayilova G., Oczak M., Sonoda L.T., Fels M., Guarino M., Vranken E., Hartung J., Bahr C., Berckmans D. (2014). Image feature extraction for classification of aggressive interactions among pigs. Comp. Electr. Agricult., 104: 57–62.
- Volkmann N., Kulig B., Hoppe S., Stracke J., Hensel O., Kemper N. (2021). On-farm detection of claw lesions in dairy cows based on acoustic analyses and machine learning. J. Dairy Sci., 104: 5921–5931.
- Warren M.A. (1997). Moral status. Obligations to persons and other living things. Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press, pp. 182–183.
- Waytz A., Gray K., Epley N., Wegner D.M. (2010). Causes and consequences of mind perception. Trends Cogn. Sci., 14: 383–388.
- Weiss A., King J.E., Hopkins W.D. (2007). A cross-setting study of chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) personality structure and development: zoological parks and Yerkes National Primate Research Center. Am. J. Primatol., 69: 1–14.
- Welfare Quality® (WQ) (2009). Welfare Quality® assessment protocol for cattle. Welfare Quality® Consortium, Lelystad, Netherlands, (source: http://www.welfarequalitynetwork.net).
- Werkheiser I. (2018). Precision livestock farming and farmers’ duties to livestock. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics, 31: 181–195.
- Williams L.R., Moore S.T., Bishop-Hurley G.J., Swain D.L. (2020). A sensor-based solution to monitor grazing cattle drinking behaviour and water intake. Comp. Electr. Agricult., 168: 105141.
- Wise S.M. (1999). Animal thing to animal person-thoughts on time, place, and theories. Animal L., Essays, 5: 61–68.
- Xiao L., Ding K., Gao Y., Rao X. (2019). Behavior-induced health condition monitoring of caged chickens using binocular vision. Comp. Electr. Agricult., 156: 254–262.
- Yajuvendra S., Lathwal S.S., Rajput N., Raja T.V., Gupta A.K., Mohanty T.K., Ruhil A.P., Chakravarty A.K., Sharma P.C., Sharma V., Chandra G. (2013). Effective and accurate discrimination of individual dairy cattle through acoustic sensing. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 146: 11–18.
- Yang A., Huang H., Yang X., Li S., Chen C., Gan H., Xue Y. (2019). Automated video analysis of sow nursing behavior based on fully convolutional network and oriented optical flow. Comp. Electr. Agricult., 167: 105048.
- Yang A., Huang H., Zheng B., Li S., Gan H., Chen C., Yang X., Xue Y. (2020). An automatic recognition framework for sow daily behaviours based on motion and image analyses. Biosyst. Eng., 192: 56–71.
- Zeder M.A. (2017). Domestication as a model system for the extended evolutionary synthesis. Interface Focus, 7: 20160133.
- Zhang F.Y., Hu Y.M., Chen L.C., Guo L.H., Duan W.J., Wang L. (2016). Monitoring behavior of poultry based on RFID radio frequency network. Int. J. Agricult. Biol. Eng., 9: 139–147.
Language: English
Page range: 913 - 925
Submitted on: Dec 14, 2022
Accepted on: Apr 21, 2023
Published on: Nov 13, 2023
Published by: National Research Institute of Animal Production
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Related subjects:
© 2023 Krzysztof Adamczyk, Jacek Nowicki, Zbigniew Wróblewski, Anna Dutkowska, published by National Research Institute of Animal Production
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.