Relationship between quality parameters and fertilizing ability of cryopreserved sexed bull sperm
By:
References
- Ahmed H., Andrabi S.M.H., Jahan S. (2016). Semen quality parameters as fertility predictors of water Buffalo bull spermatozoa during low-breeding season. Theriogenology, 86: 1516–1522.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.05.010
- Al Naib A., Hanrahan J.P., Lonergan P., Fair S. (2011). In vitro assessment of sperm from bulls of high and low field fertility. Theriogenology, 76: 161–167.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.10.038
- Alm K., Taponen J., Dahlbom M., Tuunainen E., Koskinen E., Andersson M.A. (2001). A novel automated fluorometric assay to evaluate sperm viability and fertility in dairy bulls. Theriogenology, 56: 677–684.10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00599-4
- Bailey J. L., Bilodeau J. F., Cormier N. (2000). Semen cryopreservation in domestic animals, a damaging and capacitating phenomenon. J. Androl., 21: 1–7.
- Balao da Silva C.M., Ortega Ferrusola C., Morillo Rodriguez A., Gallardo Bolaños J.M., Plaza Dávila M., Morrell J.M., Rodriguez Martínez H., Tapia J.A., Aparicio I.M., Peña F.J. (2013). Sex sorting increases the permeability of the membrane of stallion spermatozoa. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 138: 241–251.10.1016/j.anireprosci.2013.02.021
- Ballachey B.E., Hohenboken W.D., Evenson D.P. (1987). Heterogeneity of sperm nuclear chromatin structure and its relationship to bull fertility. Biol. Reprod., 36: 915–925.10.1095/biolreprod36.4.915
- Bochenek M., Smorąg Z., Pilch J. (2001). Sperm chromatin structure assay of bulls qualified for artificial insemination. Theriogenology, 56: 557–567.10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00588-X
- Boe-Hansen G.B., Morris I.D., Ersboll A.K., Greve T., Christensen, P. (2005). DNA integrity in sexed bull sperm assessed by neutral comet assay and sperm chromatin structure assay. Theriogenology, 63: 1789–1802.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.08.004
- Carvalho J.O., Sartoric R., Machadoa G.M., Mourãoc G.B., Dode M.A.N. (2010). Quality assessment of bovine cryo-preserved sperm after sexing by flow cytometry and their use in in vitro embryo production. Theriogenology, 74: 1521–1530.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.06.030
- Chamberland A., Fournier V., Tardif S., Sirard M.A., Sullivan R., Bailey J.L. (2001). The effect of heparin on motility parameters and protein phosphorylation during bovine sperm capacitation. Theriogenology, 55: 823–835.10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00446-0
- Christensen P., Labouriau R., Birck A., Boe-Hansen G.B., Pedersen J., Borchersen S. (2011). Relationship among seminal quality measures and field fertility of young dairy bulls using low-dose inseminations. J. Dairy Sci., 94: 1744–1754.10.3168/jds.2010-3087
- DeJarnette J.M., McCleary C.R., Leach M.A., Moreno J.F., Nebel R.L., Marshall C.E. (2010). Effects of 2.1 and 3.5 × 106 sex-sorted sperm dosages on conception rates of Holstein cows and heifers. J. Dairy Sci., 93: 4079–4085.10.3168/jds.2010-3181
- DeJarnette J.M., Leach M.A., Nebel R.L., Marshall C.E., McCleary C.R., Moreno J.F. (2011). Effects of sex sorting and sperm dosage on conception rates in Holstein heifers. Is comparable fertility of sex-sorted and conventional semen plausible? J. Dairy Sci., 94: 3477–3483.10.3168/jds.2011-4214
- Evenson D., Jost L. (2000). Sperm chromatin structure assay is useful for fertility assessment. Methods Cell Sci., 22: 169–189.10.1023/A:1009844109023
- Farrell P.R., Presicce G.A., Brockett C.C., Foote R.H. (1998). Quantification of bull sperm characteristics measured by computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) and the relationship to fertility. Theriogenology, 49: 871–879.10.1016/S0093-691X(98)00036-3
- Frijters A.C., Mullaart E., Roelofs R.M., van Hoorne R.P., Moreno J.F., Moreno O., Merton J.S. (2009). What affects fertility of sexed bull semen more, low sperm dosage or the sorting process? Theriogenology, 71: 64–67.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.09.02519004486
- Garner D.L. (2006). Flow cytometric sexing of mammalian sperm. Theriogenology, 65: 943–957.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.09.009
- Gillan L., Kroetsch T., Chis Maxwell W.M., Evans G. (2008). Assessment of in vitro sperm characteristics in relation to fertility in dairy bulls. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 103: 201–214.10.1016/j.anireprosci.2006.12.010
- Gogol P., Trzcińska M. (2020). Cell membrane integrity and sperm chromatin structure of sexed and unsexed bull semen (in Polish). Rocz. Nauk Zoot., 47: 235–244.
- Ho H.C., Suarez S.S. (2001). Hyperactivation of mammalian spermatozoa: function and regulation. Reproduction, 122: 519–526.10.1530/rep.0.1220519
- Holden S.A., Fernandez-Fuertes B., Murphy C., Whelan H., O’Gorman A., Brennan L., Butler S.T., Lonergan P., Fair S. (2017). Relationship between in vitro sperm functional assessments, seminal plasma composition, and field fertility after AI with either non-sorted or sex-sorted bull semen. Theriogenology, 87: 221–228.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.08.024
- Hollinshead F.K., O’brien J.K., Maxwell W.M.C., Evans G. (2004). Assessment of in vitro sperm characteristics after flow cytometric sorting of frozen-thawed bull spermatozoa. Theriogenology, 62: 958–968.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2003.12.030
- Ishijima S., Baba S.A., Mohri H., Suarez S.S. (2002). Quantitative analysis of flagellar movement in hyperactivated and acrosome-reacted golden hamster spermatozoa. Mol. Reprod. Dev., 61: 376–384.10.1002/mrd.10017
- Johnson L.A. (2000). Sexing mammalian sperm for production of offspring: the state of the art. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 60–61: 93–107.10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00088-9
- Kumar P., Mohanty T.K., Kumaresan A., Nag P., Saraf K.K., Kumar V., Lathik S., Nayak S., Bhakat M. (2018). Incubation of spermatozoa with Anandamide prior to cryopreservation reduces cryocapacitation and improves post-thaw sperm quality in the water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis). Anim. Reprod. Sci., 189: 77–83.10.1016/j.anireprosci.2017.12.010
- Lenz R.W., Gonzalez-Marin C., Gilligan T.B., DeJarnette J.M., Utt M.D., Helser L.A., Hasenpusch E., Evans K.M., Moreno J.F., Vishwanath R. (2016). SexedULTRATM, a new method of processing sex–sorted bovine sperm improves conception rates. Reprod. Fertil. Dev., 29: 203–204.10.1071/RDv29n1Ab190
- Maicas C., Hutchinson I.A., Kenneally J., Grant J., Cromie A.R., Lonergan P., Butler S.T. (2019). Fertility of fresh and frozen sex-sorted semen in dairy cows and heifers in seasonal-calving pasture-based herds. J. Dairy Sci., 102: 10530–10542.10.3168/jds.2019-16740
- Maicas C., Holden S.A., Drake E., Cromie A.R., Lonergan P., Butler S.T. (2020). Fertility of frozen sex-sorted sperm at 4 × 106 sperm per dose in lactating dairy cows in seasonal-calving pasture-based herds. J. Dairy Sci., 103: 929–939.10.3168/jds.2019-17131
- Mocé E., Graham J.K., Schenk J.L. (2006). Effect of sex-sorting on the ability of fresh and cryopreserved bull sperm to undergo an acrosome reaction. Theriogenology, 66: 929–936.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.01.063
- Morrell J.M., Nongbua T., Valeanu S., Verde I.L., Lundstedt-Enkel K., Edman A., Johannisson A. (2017). Sperm quality variables as indicators of bull fertility may be breed dependent. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 185: 42–52.10.1016/j.anireprosci.2017.08.001
- Oikawa K., Yamazaki T., Yamaguchi S., Abe H., Bai H., Takahashi M., Kawahara M. (2019). Effects of use of conventional and sexed semen on the conception rate in heifers: A comparison study. Theriogenology, 135: 33–37.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2019.06.012
- Oliveira L.Z., de Arruda R.P., de Andrade A.F., Celeghini E.C., Reeb P.D., Martins J.P. (2013). Assessment of in vitro sperm characteristics and their importance in the prediction of conception rate in a bovine timed-AI program. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 137: 145–155.10.1016/j.anireprosci.2013.01.010
- Phillips N., Mcgowan M., Johnston S., Mayer D. (2004). Relationship between thirty post-thaw spermatozoal characteristics and the field fertility of 11 high-use Australian dairy AI sires. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 81: 47–61.10.1016/j.anireprosci.2003.10.003
- Rabidas S.K., Talukder A.K., Alam M.G.S., Bari F.Y. (2012). Relationship between semen quality parameters and field fertility of bulls. J. Emb. Trans., 27: 21–28.
- Reese S., Pirez M.C., Steele H., Kölle S. (2021). The reproductive success of bovine sperm after sex-sorting: a meta-analysis. Sci. Rep., 11: 17366.10.1038/s41598-021-96834-2
- Rybak R., Faldikova L., Faldyna M., Machatkova M., Rubes J. (2004). Bull and boar sperm DNA integrity evaluated by sperm chromatin structure assay in the Czech Republic. Vet. Med. Czech, 49: 1–8.10.17221/5668-VETMED
- Sailer B.L., Jost L.K., Evenson D.P. (1996). Bull sperm head morphometry related to abnormal chromatin structure and fertility. Cytometry, 24: 167–173.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0320(19960601)24:2<167::AID-CYTO9>3.0.CO;2-G
- Schenk J.L., Cran D.G., Everestt R.W., Seidel G.E. Jr. (2009). Pregnancy rates in heifers and cows with cryopreserved sexed sperm: Effects of sperm numbers per inseminated, sorting pressure and sperm storage before sorting. Theriogenology, 71: 717–728.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.08.016
- Seidel G.E. Jr. (2012). Sexing mammalian sperm – where do we go from here? J. Reprod. Dev., 58: 505–509.10.1262/jrd.2012-077
- Seidel G.E. Jr. (2014). Update on sexed semen technology in cattle. Animal, 8 (Suppl. 1): 160–164.10.1017/S1751731114000202
- Sellem E., Broekhuijse M.L.W.J., Chevrier L., Camugli S., Schmitt E., Schibler L., Koenen E.P.C. (2015). Use of combinations of in vitro quality assessments to predict fertility of bovine semen. Theriogenology, 84: 1447–1454.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.07.035
- Singh V.K., Kumar R., Atreja S.K. (2014). Cryo-survival, cryo-capacitation and oxidative stress assessment of buffalo spermatozoa cryopreserved in new soya milk extender. Livest. Sci., 160: 214–218.10.1016/j.livsci.2013.12.013
- Stauss C.R., Votta T.J., Suarez S.S. (1995). Sperm motility hyperactivation facilitates penetration of the hamster zona pellucida. Biol. Reprod., 53: 1280–1285.10.1095/biolreprod53.6.1280
- Suh T.K., Schenk J.L., Seidel G.E. Jr. (2005). High pressure flow cytometric sorting damages sperm. Theriogenology, 64: 1035–1048.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.02.002
- Szczęśniak-Fabiańczyk B., Gogol P., Gajda L., Smorąg Z. (2021). Application of high hydrostatic pressure (HHP) to improve cryopreservation of young bull semen. Ann. Anim. Sci., 21: 1367–1375.10.2478/aoas-2021-0059
- Trzcińska M., Bryła M., Gajda B., Gogol P. (2015). Fertility of boar semen cryopreserved in extender supplemented with butylated hydroxytoluene. Theriogenology, 83: 307–313.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.07.045
- Turner R.M. (2003). Tales from the tail: what do we really know about sperm motility? J. Androl., 24: 790–803.10.1002/j.1939-4640.2003.tb03123.x
- Vishwanath R., Moreno J. F. (2018). Review: Semen sexing – current state of the art with emphasis on bovine species. Animal, 12: 85–96.10.1017/S1751731118000496
- Ward F., Rizos D., Corridan D., Quinn K., Boland M., Lonergan P. (2001). Paternal influence on the time of first embryonic cleavage post insemination and the implications for subsequent bovine embryo development in vitro and fertility in vivo. Mol. Reprod. Dev., 60: 47–55.10.1002/mrd.1060
Language: English
Page range: 1257 - 1263
Submitted on: Mar 9, 2022
Accepted on: Jun 1, 2022
Published on: Oct 29, 2022
Published by: National Research Institute of Animal Production
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2022 Piotr Gogol, Monika Trzcińska, published by National Research Institute of Animal Production
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.