Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Temporal Trends in Performance and Hatchability Traits of Eight Strains of Hens Covered by the Gene Pool Protection Programme in Poland Cover

Temporal Trends in Performance and Hatchability Traits of Eight Strains of Hens Covered by the Gene Pool Protection Programme in Poland

Open Access
|Oct 2021

References

  1. Abdelqader A., Wollny C. B. A., Gauly M. (2007). Characterization of local chicken production systems and their potential under different levels of management practice in Jordan. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 39: 155–164.
  2. Alderson L. (2010). Breeds at risk. Criteria and classification. Report from a seminar held in London. 16–17.02.2010, Convenor, 1: 1–14.
  3. Anang A., Mielenz N., Schüler L. (2000). Genetic and phenotypic parameters for monthly egg production in White Leghorn hens. J. Anim. Breed. Genet., 117: 407–415.
  4. Boichard D., Maignel L., Verrier E. (1997). The value of using probabilities of gene origin to measure genetic variability in a population. Genet. Sel. Evol., 29: 5–23.
  5. Borzemska W. B., Kosowska G. (1997). Major problems of pathology in poultry hatch (in Polish). Zesz. Nauk. Prz. Hod., 3: 25–31.
  6. Brodacki A., Zięba G., Cywa-Benko K. (2001). Genetic distance between selected breeds and lines of laying hens. Electron. J. Pol. Agric. Univ. - Anim. Husb., 4: 1–4.
  7. Brodacki A., Tarkowski J., Flis J. (2003). Genetic distances in hens estimated with protein genes frequencies and procedures of DNA analysis. Electron. J. Pol. Agric. Univ. - Anim. Husb., 6: 56–61.
  8. Caballero A., Toro M. A. (2000). Interrelations between effective population size and other pedigree tools for the management of conserved populations. Genet. Res., 75: 331–343.
  9. Calik J. (2002). The relationships between body weight of hen and egg weight (in Polish). Rocz. Nauk. Zoot. Supl., 16: 95–102.
  10. Calik J. (2008). Analysis of some genetic and productive parameters and egg quality of hens from RIW (A-33) and RIR (K-22) conservation lines. Ann. Anim. Sci., 8: 113–119.
  11. Calik J. (2009). Trends for productive and genetic parameters in three lines of laying hens over eight generations (in Polish). Rocz. Nauk. Zoot., 36: 31–43.
  12. Calik J., Krawczyk J., Szefer M. (2012). Population status of laying hens enrolled in the animal genetic resources conservation programme in Poland (in Polish). Wiad. Zoot., 4: 31–39.
  13. Cervantes I., Goyache F., Molina A., Valera M., Gutierrez J. P. (2011). Estimation of effective population size from the rate of coancestry in pedigreed populations. J. Anim. Breed. Genet., 128: 56–63.
  14. Cywa-Benko K. (2002). Genetic and phenotypic characteristic of native chicken breeds encompassed in biodiversity conservation program (in Polish). Rocz. Nauk. Zoot., Rozpr. Hab., 15: 1–112.
  15. Dobrzański J., Calik J., Krawczyk J., Szwaczkowski T. (2019). Conservation of goose genetic resources in Poland – past and present status. World’s Poultry Sci., 75: 387–400.
  16. Fathi M. M., Al . -Homidan I., Abou-Emera O. K., Al-Moshawah A. (2017). Characterisation of Saudi native chicken breeds: a case study of morphological and productive traits. World’s Poultry Sci., 73: 916–927.
  17. Gryzińska M., Batkowska J., Al-Shammari K., Ambro ż kiewicz J., Je ż ewska-Witkowska G. (2015). Hatchability of selected breeds of hens maintained as Polish conservation flocks. Elect. J. Pol. Agric. Univ. - Anim. Husb., 18: 1–8.
  18. Hazary R., Kataria M., Nath M. (2000). Response to selection for egg mass in Rhode Island Red flock. Proc. XXI World Poultry Congress. Montreal, Canada, 22–25.08.2000, 12: 3.
  19. Hocking P. M., Bain M., Channing C. E., Fleming R., Wilson S. (2003). Genetic variation for egg production, egg quality and bone strength in selected and traditional breeds of laying fowl. Brit. Poultry Sci., 44: 365–373.
  20. Krawczyk J. (2006). Determination of egg production profitability based on the relationship between chicken’s body weight and egg weight (in Polish). Rocz. Nauk. Zoot., 33: 255–262.
  21. Krawczyk J. (2018). Some productive traits of the native breeds of Greenleg Partridge and Yellowleg Partridge hens (in Polish). Wiad. Zoot., 2: 68–72.
  22. Krawczyk J., Calik J. (2010). Comparison of performance in five generations of laying hens from Polish conservation flocks (in Polish). Rocz. Nauk. Zoot., 37: 41–54.
  23. Krawczyk J., Puchała M., Obrzut J. (2012). Hatchability in laying hen flocks under the conservation programme (in Polish). Wiad. Zoot., 4: 41–46.
  24. Marquez G. C., Siegel P. B., Lewis R. M. (2010). Genetic diversity and population structure in lines of chickens divergently selected for high and low 8-week body weight. Poultry Sci., 89: 2580–2588.
  25. Mtileni B. J., Muchadeyi F. C., Maiwashe A., Chimonyo M., Dzama K. (2012). Conservation and utilisation of chicken genetic resources in Southern Africa. World’s Poultry Sci., 68: 727–747.
  26. Niedziółka J. (1997). Physiological and zoohygienic bases of incubating eggs of gallinaceous bird (in Polish). Zesz. Nauk. Prz. Hod., 31: 15–23.
  27. Özdemir D., Özdemir E. R., Marchi M. D., Cassandro M. (2013). Conservation of local Turkish and Italian chicken breeds: a case study. It. J. Anim. Sci., 12: 313–319.
  28. Padhi M. K. (2016). Importance of indigenous breeds of chicken for rural economy and their improvements for higher production performance. Hindawi Pub. Corp. Sci., 1: 1–9.
  29. Pham M. H., Tran X. H., Berthouly-Salazar C., Tixier-Boichard M., Chen C. F., Lee Y. P. (2016). Monitoring of genetic diversity in Taiwan conserved chickens assessed by pedigree and molecular data. Livest. Sci., 184: 85–91.
  30. Polak G., Krupiński J., Martyniuk E., Calik J., Kawęcka A., Krawczyk J., Majewska A., Sikora J., Sosin-Bzducha E., Szyndler-Nędza M., Tomczyk-Wrona I. (2021). Assessment of risk status of Polish local breeds under conservation programmes. Ann. Anim. Sci., 21: 125–140.
  31. Semik E., Krawczyk J. (2011). The state of poultry genetic resources and genetic diversity of hen populations. Ann. Anim. Sci., 11: 181–191.
  32. Singh B., Singh H., Singh C. V. (2000). Genetic parameters of growth, egg production and egg quality traits in White Leghorn. J. Poultry Sci., 35: 13–16.
  33. Spalona A., Ranving H., Cywa-Benko K., Zanon A., Sabbioni A., Szalay I., Benkova J., Baumgartner J., Szwaczkowski T. (2007). Population size in conservation of local chicken breeds in chosen European countries. Arch. Geflugelkd., 71: 49–55.
  34. Szwaczkowski T. (2003). Use of mixed model methodology in poultry breeding: estimation of genetic parameters. In: Poultry genetics breeding and biotechnology. CABI Publishing, pp. 165–203.10.1079/9780851996608.0165
  35. Van Marle-Köster E., Hefer C. A., Nel L. H., Groenen M. A. M. (2008). Genetic diversity and population structure of locally adapted South African chicken lines: implications for conservation. South Afr. J. Anim. Sci., 38: 271–281.
  36. Vostrý L., Vostrá-Vydrová H., Moravčíková N., Hofmanová B., Rychtářová J., Machová K., Brzáková M., Kasarda R. (2020). Monitoring of genetic diversity in autochthonous Czech poultry breeds assessed by genealogical data. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 65: 224–231.
  37. Wężyk S., Cywa-Benko K., Siwek M., Bednarczyk M., Calik J. (2000). Studies on genetic differences in genetic reserve breeds of hens (in Polish). Rocz. Nauk. Zoot., 27: 115–127.
  38. Woelders H., Zuidberg C. A., Hiemstra S. J. (2006). Animal genetic resources conservation in the Netherlands and Europe. Poultry perspective. Poultry Sci., 85: 216–222.
  39. World Watch List for Domestic Animal Diversity (2000). FAO/UNEP, Roma, 3rd ed.
  40. Wright S. (1931). Evaluation in Mendelian populations. Genetics, 14: 97–159.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aoas-2021-0062 | Journal eISSN: 2300-8733 | Journal ISSN: 1642-3402
Language: English
Page range: 1347 - 1366
Submitted on: Nov 25, 2020
|
Accepted on: Jul 29, 2021
|
Published on: Oct 28, 2021
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: Volume open

© 2021 Joanna Obrzut, Jolanta Calik, Józefa Krawczyk, published by National Research Institute of Animal Production
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.