Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The risk status of Polish local breeds under conservation programmes – new approach Cover

References

  1. Alderson L. (2003). Criteria for the recognition and prioritisation of breeds of special genetic importance. Anim. Genet. Res. Info., 33: 1–9.
  2. Alderson L. (2010). Breeds at Risk. Criteria and Classification. Report from a seminar held in London, 16–17.02.2010. Convenor.
  3. Bundesanstaltfür Landwirtschaftund Ernährung(BLE)(2019). Einheimische Nutztierrassen in Deutschland und Rote Liste gefährdeter Nutztierrassen 2019. https://www.genres.de/fileadmin/SITE_MASTER/content/Publikationen_IBV/buch_roteliste_2019_web.pdf
  4. Dobrzański J., Calik J., Krawczyk J., Szwaczkowski T. (2019). Conservation of goose genetic resources in Poland – past and present status. World. Poultry Sci. J., 75: 387–399.
  5. Duchev Z. (2014). New breed classification system. The new interface and the status of Implementation. ERFP WG Documentation and Information meeting, Thessaloniki, 05–06.03.2014. https://www.rfp-urope.org/fileadmin/SITE_ERFP/WG_Docu/new_breeds_class.pdf
  6. FAO(2004). Secondary guidelines for the development of management plans of the animal genetic resource at the national level. FAO Publications, Rome.
  7. FAO (2007 a). The State of the World’s Animal Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (B. Rischkowsky, D. Pilling, eds). FAO Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture Assessments. Rome.
  8. FAO (2007 b). Report of The International Technical Conference on Animal Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Interlaken, Switzerland, 3–7.09.2007, Rome. http://www.fao.org/ag/againfo/programmes/en/genetics/documents/Interlaken/Final_Report_en.pdf
  9. FAO 2013). In vivo conservation of animal genetic resources. FAO Animal Production and Health Guidelines. No. 14, Rome.
  10. FAO (2015). The Second Report on the State of the World’s Animal Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, edited by B.D. Scherf and D. Pilling. FAO Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture Assessments. Rome. Available at: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4787e/index.html
  11. Gandini G., Ollivier L., Danell B., Distl O., Georgudis A., Groeneveld E., Martyniuk E., van Arendonk J., Woolliams J. (2005). Criteria to assess the degree of endangerment of livestock breeds in Europe. Livest. Prod. Sci., 91: 173–182.
  12. Gicquel E., Boettcher P., Besbes B., Furre S., Fernández J., Danchin-Burge C., Berger B., Baumung R., Feijóo J.R.J., Leroy G. (2019). Impact of conservation measures on demography and genetic variability of livestock breeds. Animal, 1–11.
  13. Groeneveld L.F., Lenstra J.A., Eding H., Toro M.A., Scherf B., Pilling D., Negrini R., Finlay E.K., Jianlin H., Groeneveld E., Weigend S., Globaldiv Consortium(2010). Genetic diversity in farm animals – A review. Anim. Genet., 41, Suppl 1: 6–31.
  14. IUCN(2019). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2019-2. https://www.iucnredlist.org
  15. Krawczyk J., Calik J. (2010). Comparison of performance in five generations of laying hens from Polish conservation flocks (in Polish). Rocz. Nauk. Zoot., 37: 41–54.
  16. Krupiński J. (2019). Praktyczne aspekty badań projektu „Kierunki wykorzystania oraz ochrona zasobów genetycznych zwierząt gospodarskich w warunkach zrównoważonego. Konferencja „Rasy rodzime, ekologia, współpraca” (in Polish). MRiRW, 17.12.2019, Warszawa. http://www.izoo.krakow.pl/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogcategory&id=19&Itemid=50
  17. Krupiński J., Polak G. (2018). Conservation of farm animal biodiversity in the conditions of sustainable agriculture (in Polish). Prz. Hod., 5: 1–8.
  18. Leroy G., Mary-Huard T., Verrier E., Danvy S., Charvolin E., Danchin-Burge C. (2013). Methods to estimate effective population size using pedigree data: examples in dog, sheep, cattle and horse. Genet. Sel. Evol., 45: 1.
  19. Leroy G., Carroll E.L., Bruford M.W., De Woody J.A., Strand A., Waits L., Wang J. (2017). Next-generation metrics for monitoring genetic erosion within populations of conservation concern. Evol. Appl., https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.1256410.1111/eva.12564605018230026798
  20. Leroy G., Gicquel E., Boettcher P., Besbes B., Furre S., Fernandez J., Danchin-Burge C., Alnahhas N., Baumung R. (2019). Coancestry rate’s estimate of effective population size for genetic variability monitoring. Conserv. Genet. Res., https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-019-01092-010.1007/s12686-019-01092-0
  21. Loftus R., Scherf B. (1993). World watch list for domestic animal diversity. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
  22. Ministerodelle Politiche Agricole Alimentarie Forestali(2013). Linee guida per la conservazione e la caratterizzazione della biodiversità vegetale, animale e microbica di interesse per l’agricoltura. Piano Nazionale sulla Biodiversità di Interesse Agricolo, Inea, Roma.
  23. MRi RW(2012). Strategia Zrównoważonego Rozwoju Wsi, Rolnictwa i Rybactwa na lata 2012–2020. Warszawa, Poland.
  24. MRi RW(2013). Krajowa Strategia Zrównoważonego Użytkowania i Ochrony Zasobów Genetycznych Zwierząt Gospodarskich. Warszawa, Poland.
  25. Polak G. (2016). Are the breeders of native horse breeds interested in preserving the animal genetic resources? Proc. 67th EAAP, Tallin, Estonia, 29.08–02.09.2016. Book of Abstracts, 21: 582.
  26. Santiago E., Caballero A. (1995). Effective size of populations under selection. Genetics, 139: 1013–1030.
  27. Scherf B.D. (2000). World Watch List for domestic animal diversity. 3rd ed. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
  28. Siekierski C. (2018). The role of agriculture and rural areas in the context of the new EU multiannual financial framework for 2021–2027. Proc. VIII Int. Conf.: Family farms in the face of the challenges of sustainable development. UR, Kraków, Poland, 21.06.2018.
  29. Sturaro E. (2017). Socio-economic parameters for trends and risks. Report from meeting in Padova 3–4 November 2016. Beograd, 3.05.2017.
  30. Verrier E., Audiot A., Bertrand C., Chapuis H., Charvolin E., Danchin-Burge C., Danvy S., Gourdine J.L., Gaultier P., Guémené D., Laloë D., Lenoir H., Leroy G., Naves M., Patin S., Sabbagh M. (2015). Assessing the risk status of livestock breeds: a multi-indicator method applied to 178 French local breeds belonging to ten species. Anim. Genet. Res., Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 57: 105–118.
  31. Wainwright W., Ahmadi B.V., Mcvittie A., Simm G., Moran D. (2019). Prioritising support for cost effective rare breed conservation using multi-criteria decision analysis frontiers in ecology and evolution. Front. Ecol. Evol., doi: 10.3389/fevo.2019.0011010.3389/fevo.2019.00110
  32. Wright S. (1931). Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics, 16: 97–159.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aoas-2020-0071 | Journal eISSN: 2300-8733 | Journal ISSN: 1642-3402
Language: English
Page range: 125 - 140
Submitted on: Dec 30, 2019
Accepted on: Jul 3, 2020
Published on: Jan 29, 2021
Published by: National Research Institute of Animal Production
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2021 Grażyna Polak, Jędrzej Krupiński, Elżbieta Martyniuk, Jolanta Calik, Aldona Kawęcka, Józefa Krawczyk, Anna Majewska, Jacek Sikora, Ewa Sosin-Bzducha, Magdalena Szyndler-Nędza, Iwona Tomczyk-Wrona, published by National Research Institute of Animal Production
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.