References
- Banaszewska D., Kondrcki S. (2012). An assessment of the breeding maturity insemination boars based on ejaculate quality changes. Folia Biol.-Krakow, 60: 151–162.
- Blom E. (1981). The morphological estimation of the spermatozoa defects of bull II. The proposal of new classification of spermatozoa defects (in Polish). Med. Weter., 37: 239–242.
- Chamberlain T.S., Hughes P.E. (1996). The influence of mating frequency and nutrition on the stimulus value of boars. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 43: 151–160.
- Ciereszko A., Ottobre J.S., Glogowski J. (2000). Effects of season and breed on sperm acrosin activity and semen quality of boars. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 64: 89–96.
- Czarnecki R., R ó ż ycki M., Udała J., Kawê cka M., Kamyczek M., Pietruszka A., Delikator B. (1999). The growth rate, meatiness value and reproductive performance of young Duroc boars and their hybrids with the Pietrain breed. Ann. Anim. Sci. Suppl., 3: 105–110.
- Estienne M.J., Harper A.F. (2000). PGF2. facilitates the training of sexually active boars for semen collection. Theriogenology, 4: 1087–1092.
- Estienne M.J., Harper A.F. (2004). Semen characteristics and libido in boars treated repeatedly with PGF2. J. Anim. Sci., 82: 1494–1498.
- Estienne M.J., Harper A.F., Knight J.W., Barb C.R., Pampace k G.B. (2004). Sexual behavior after treatment with prostaglandin-F2. in boars with suppressed concentrantions of gonadal steroids. App. Anim. Behav. Sci., 89: 53–57.
- Frydrychova S., Opleta l L., Macá ková K., Luyková A., Rozkot M., Lipen - ský J. (2011). Effects of herbal preparation on libido and semen quality in boars. Reprod. Dom.
- Anim., 46: 573–578.
- Galina C.S., Horn M.M., Molina R. (2007). Reproductive behaviour in bulls raised under tropical and subtropical conditions. Horm. Behav., 52: 26–31.
- Hemsworth P.H., Tilbrook A.J. (2007). Sexual behavior of male pigs. Horm. Behav., 52: 39–44.
- Horn M.M., Moraes J.C.F., Jaume C.M., Edelweiss M.I.A., Ros ado A. (2005). Reproductive deficiency in bulls from synthetic breeds according to the type of crossbreed and the morphology of the Y chromosome. Genet. Mol. Biol., 28: 225–229.
- Kawê cka M., Pietruszka A., Jacyno E., Czarnecki R., Kamyczek M. (2008). Quality of semen of young boars of the breeds Pietrain and Duroc and their reciprocal crosses. Arch. Tierz., 51: 42–54.
- Knecht D., ś rodoñ S., Szulc K., Duziñ ski K. (2013). The effect of photoperiod on selected parameters of boar semen. Livest. Sci., 157: 364–371.
- Kondracki S., Iwanina M., Wysokiñ ska A., Huszno M. (2012). Comparative analysis of Duroc and Pietrain boar sperm morphology. Acta Vet. Brno, 81: 195–199.
- Levis D.G., Ford J.J., Christensen R.K. (1997). An evaluation of three methods for assessing sexual behaviours in boars. J. Anim. Sci., 75: 348–355.
- Levis D.G., Reicks D.L. (2005). Assessment of sexual behavior and effect of semen collection pen design and sexual stimulation of boars on behavior and sperm output – a review. Theriogenology, 63: 630–642.
- Okere Ch., Joseph A., Ezekwe M. (2005). Seasonal and genotype variations in libido, semen production and quality in artificial insemination boars. J. Anim. Vet. Adv., 4: 885–888.
- Petherick J.C. (2005). A review of some factors affecting the expression of libido in beef cattle, and individual bull and herd fertility. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 90: 185–205.
- Pound N., Javed M.H., Ruberto C., Anis Shaikh M., Del Valle A.P. (2002). Duration of sexual arousal predicts semen parameters for masturbatory ejaculates. Physiol. Behav., 76: 685–689.
- Quririno C.R., Bergmann J.A.G., Vale Filho V.R., Andrade V.J., Reis S.R., Men - donca R.M., Fonseca C.G. (2004). Genetic parameters of libido in Brazilian Nellore bulls. Theriogenology, 62: 1–7.
- Ren D., Xing Y., Lin M., Wu Y., Li K., Li W., Yang S., Guo T., Ren J., Ma J., Lan L., Huang L. (2009). Evaluations of boar gonad development, spermatogenesis with regard to semen characteristics, libido and serum testosterone levels based on Large White Duroc × Chinese Erhualian crossbred boars. Reprod. Dom. Anim., 44: 913–919.
- Smital J., De Sousa L.L., Mohnsen A. (2004). Differences among breeds and manifestation of heterosis in AI boar sperm output. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 80: 121–130.
- Sonderman J.P., Luebbe J.J. (2008). Semen production and fertility issues related to differences in genetic lines of boars. Theriogenology, 70: 1380–1383.
- Williams S. (2009). Assessment of the boar reproductive efficiency: Physiology and implications. Rev. Bras. Reprod. Anim. Belo Horizonte, 6: 194–198.
- Wolf J., Smital J. (2009). Quantification of factors affecting semen traits in artificial insemination boars from animal model analyses. J. Anim. Sci., 87: 1620–1627.
- Wysokiñ ska A., Kondracki S., Banaszewska D. (2006). Application of spermiogram classification in the evaluation of the semen morphology of Duroc× Pietrain crossbreds and purebred Duroc and Pietrain. Anim. Sci. Pap. Rep., 24: 319–325.
- Wy sokiñ ska A., Kondracki S., Kowalewski D., Adamiak A., Muczyñ ska E. (2009). Effect of seasonal factors on the ejaculate properties of crossbred Duroc× Pietrain and Pietrain × Duroc boars as well as purebred Duroc and Pietrain boars. Bull. Vet. Inst. Pulawy, 53: 677–685.
- Xing Y., Ren J., Ren D., Guo Y., Wu Y., Yang G., Mao H., Brenig B., Huang L. (2009). A whole genome scanning for quantitative trait loci on traits related to sperm quality and ejaculation in pigs. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 114: 210–218.