References
- Bessei W. (2006). Welfare of broilers: a review. Poultry Sci., 62: 455–466.
- Buijs S., Keeling L., Rettenbacher S., VanPoucke E., Tuyttens F.A.M. (2009).
- Stocking density effects on broiler welfare: Identifying sensitive ranges for different indicators.
- Poultry Sci., 88: 1536–1543.
- Dawkins M.S., Donnelly Ch.A., Jones T.A. (2004). Chicken welfare is influenced more by housing conditions than by stocking density. Nature, 427: 342–344.
- Estevez I. (2007). Density allowances for broilers: Where to set the limits? Poultry Sci., 86: 1265–1272.
- Estevez I., Newberry R.C., Reyna L.A. (1997). Broiler chickens: a tolerant social system?
- Etologia, 5: 19–29.
- Feddes J.J.R., Emmanuel E.J., Zuidhof M.J. (2002). Broiler performance, bodyweight variance, feed and water intake and carcass quality at different stocking densities. Poultry Sci., 81: 774–779.
- Gallot S., Champagne J. (2010). Stagnation of technical and economical results and production cost of standard broilers and medium turkeys in France since the late 1990s. Bulletin de l’Academie Veterinaire de France, 163: 199–205.
- Jones T.A., Donnelly C.A., Dawkins M.S. (2005). Environmental and management factors affecting the welfare of chickens on commercial farms in the United Kingdom and Denmark stocked at five densities. Poultry Sci., 84: 1155–1165.
- LayJr D.C., Fulton R.M., Hester P.Y., Karcher D.M., Kjaer J.B., Mench J.A., Mul-lens B.A., Newberry R.C., Nicol C.J., O’Sullivan N.P., Porter R.E. (2011). Hen welfare in different housing systems. Poultry Sci., 90: 278–294.
- Meluzzi A., Fabbri C., Folegatti E., Sirri F. (2008). Survey of chicken rearing conditions iItaly: effects of litter quality and stocking density on productivity, foot dermatitis and carcase injuries. Br. Poultry Sci., 49: 257–264.
- Mihułka M., Chuto J., Wroñska D., Nowakowska A., Perłakowska M. (2003). Technological characteristics of poultry and pig rearing in the European Union (in Polish). Ministerstwo Środowiska, Warszawa, pp. 43–45.
- Napolitano F., Castellini C., Naspetti S., Piasentier E., Girolami A., Braghie-ri A. (2013). Consumer preference for chicken breast may be more affected by information on organic production than by product sensory properties. Poultry Sci., 92: 820–826.
- Sikder S.K., Majumder S.C., Halder G. (2012). Effect of different level of stocking density on feed and water intake of broiler chicken. Int. J. Bio-resource and Stress Management, 3: 084–087.
- Skarżyñska A. (ed.) (2007). Economic results of selected agricultural products in the years 2005- 2006 (in Polish). The issues of agricultural economics. Supplement to book, 3: 5–16.
- Sobczyk G. (ed.) (2004). Economics of small and medium enterprises (in Polish). Difin, Warszawa, pp. 78–88.
- Sosnówka-Czajka E., Herbut E., Skomorucha I. (2010). Effect of different housing systems on productivity and welfare of laying hens. Ann. Anim. Sci., 10: 349–360.
- Tong H.B., Lu J., Zou J.M., Wang Q., Shi S.R. (2012). Effects of stocking density on growth performance, carcass yield, and immune status of a local chicken breed. Poultry Sci., 91: 667–673.
- Utnik-Banaś K. (2012). Time series analysis for prices of broiler livestock in the years 1991-2011 (in Polish, abstract in English). Quantitative methods in economic studies, Wyd. SGGW, Warszawa, XIII: 224–233.
- Vanhonacker F., Verbeke W. (2009). Buying higher welfare poultry products? Profiling Flemish consumers who do and do not. Poultry Sci., 88: 2702–2711.
- vanHorne P.L.M., Achterbosch T.J. (2008). Animal welfare in poultry production systems: impact of EU standards on world trade. World’s Poultry Sci. J., 64: 40–51.
- Ventura B.A., Siewerdt F., Estevez I. (2010). Effects of barrier perches and density on broiler leg health, fear and performance. Poultry Sci., 89: 1574–1583.
- Verspecht A., Vanhonacker F., Verbeke W., Zoons J., Huylenbroeck G. V. (2011). Economic impact of decreasing stocking densities in broiler production in Belgium. Poultry Sci., 90: 1844–1851.