Labelling the Behaviour of Piglets and Activity Monitoring from Video as a Tool of Assessing Interest in Different Environmental Enrichments / Oznaczanie zachowania i monitorowanie aktywności prosiąt na podstawie zapisu wideo jako narzędzie oceny ich zainteresowania różnymi elementami wzbogacającymi środowisko

Ismayilova, Gunel; Costa, Annamaria; Fontana, Ilaria; Berckmans, Daniel; Guarino, Marcella

doi:10.2478/aoas-2013-0037

Abstract

The aim of this study was to explore the preference and the duration of interest of weaned pigs to two different types of environmental enrichments using labelling techniques and activity monitoring. Two pens each housing 14 Dalland piglets were monitored using a video camera. The videos were labelled during the weaning phase from 30 to 60 days of age. During this time, the video recording software continuously calculated the activity index of the pigs. To detect pig exploratory and playing behaviour, a wooden block and chain enrichment were introduced into each pen for 30 days. Each video frame was manually labelled during the Day 1, 5 and 30 (24 hours a day) for each pen using the Labelling Tool software. To identify the duration and frequency of interactive episodes with environmental enrichments, pig behaviour was labelled as either: no activity, interacting with chain or interacting with the wooden block. The mean duration of interactive episodes for the chain was greater than for the wooden block (P<0.001), while the frequency of interactive episodes was 28.8% higher for the wooden block than for the chain. By day 5, the mean duration of interaction episodes decreased in both pens and by day 30, only a few interaction episodes were observed. The number of interactive episodes were strictly related to the activity index and depended on the time of the day. The peaks of the mean number of interactive episodes calculated for all days of observations corresponded to the peaks of the mean activity index.

References

Aerts J.-M., Lippens M., De Groote G., Buyse J., Decuypere E., Vranken E., Ber-ckmans D. (2003 a). Recursive prediction of broiler growth response to feed intake by usingatime-variant parameter estimation method. Poultry Sci., 82: 40-49.10.1093/ps/82.1.40
Search in Google Scholar
Aerts J.-M., Van Buggenhout S., Lippens M., Buyse J., Decuypere E., Vran -ken E., Berckmans D. (2003). Active control of the growth trajectory of broiler chickens based on on-line animal responses. Poultry Sci., 82: 1853-1862.
Search in Google Scholar
Arey D.S. (1993). The effect of bedding on the behaviour and welfare of pigs. Anim. Welfare, 2: 235-246.
Search in Google Scholar
Beattie V.E., Walker N., Sneddon I.A. (1995). Effects of environmental enrichment on behaviour and productivity of growing pigs. Anim. Welfare, 4: 207-220.
Search in Google Scholar
Beattie V.E., Walker N., Sneddon A. (1996). An investigation of the effect of environmental enrichment and space allowance on the behaviour and production of growing pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 48: 151-158.10.1016/0168-1591(96)01031-3
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Beattie V.E., O ’ Connell N.E., Moss B.W. (2000). Influence of environmental enrichment on the behaviour, performance and meat quality of domestic pigs. Livest. Prod. Sci., 65: 71-79.10.1016/S0301-6226(99)00179-7
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Bench C.J., Gonyou H.W. (2006). Effect of environmental enrichment at two stages of development on belly nosing in piglets weaned at fourteen days. J. Anim. Sci., 84: 3397-3403.
Search in Google Scholar
Blackshaw J.K., Thomas F.J., Lee J.A. (1997). The effect ofafixed or free toy on the growth rate and aggressive behaviour of weaned pigs and the influence of hierarchy on initial investigation of the toys. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 53: 203-212.10.1016/S0168-1591(96)01087-8
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Bloemen H., Berckmans D., Aerts J.-M., Goedseels V. (1997). Image analysis to measure activity of animals. Equine Vet. J., 23: 16-19.
Search in Google Scholar
Bøe K.E. (1993). The effect of age at weaning and post-weaning environment on the behaviour of pigs. Acta Agr. Scand. A-An., 43: 173-180.
Search in Google Scholar
Bolhuis J.E., Schouten W.G.P., Schrama J.W., Wiegant V.M. (2005). Behavioural development of pigs with different coping characteristics in barren and substrate-enriched housing conditions. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 93: 213-228.10.1016/j.applanim.2005.01.006
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Bracke M.B.M., Zonderland J.J., Lenskens P., Schouten W.G.P., Vermeer H., Spoolder H.A.M., Hendriks H.J.M., Hopster H. (2006). Formalised review of environmental enrichment for pigs in relation to political decision making. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 98: 165-182.10.1016/j.applanim.2005.08.021
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Cangar O., Leroy T., Guarino M., Vranken E., Fallon R., Lenehan J., Mee J., Ber-ckmans D. (2008). Automatic real-time monitoring of locomotion and posture behaviour of pregnant cows prior to calving using online image analysis. Comput. Electron. Agr., 64: 53-60.10.1016/j.compag.2008.05.014
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Day J.E.L., Spoolder H.A.M., Burfoot A., Chamberlain H.L., Edwards S.A. (2002). The separate and interactive effects of handling and environmental enrichment on the behaviour and welfare of growing pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 75: 177-192.10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00199-X
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
De Wet L., Vranken E., Chedad A., Aerts J.-M., Berckmans D. (2003). Computerassisted image analysis to quantify daily growth rates of broiler chickens. Brit. Poultry Sci., 44: 524-532.10.1080/0007166031000161619214584841
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
EU Directive 2001/93/ECamending Directive 91/630/EEClaying down minimum standards for the protection of pigs.
Search in Google Scholar
Feddes J.J.R., Fraser D. (1994). Non-nutritive chewing by pigs: implications for tail biting and behavioural enrichment. Trans. ASAE, 37: 947-950.10.13031/2013.28163
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Fraser D., Phillips P.A., Thompson B.K., Tennessen T. (1991). Effect of straw on the behaviour of growing pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 30: 307-318.10.1016/0168-1591(91)90135-K
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Grandin T. (1988). Environmental enrichment for confinement pigs. Livestock Handling Committee. Proc. 1988 Annual Meeting, Kansas City, Missouri.
Search in Google Scholar
Grandin T. (1989). Effect of rearing environment and environmental enrichment on behaviour and neural development in young pigs. Dissertation. University of Illinois, Urbana-Campaign, IL.
Search in Google Scholar
Guarino M., Costa A., Van Hirtum A., Jans P., Ghesquiere K., Aerts J.- M., Ber-ckmans D. (2004). Field tests of an algorithm to predict infected pig coughing. Ann. Anim. Sci., Suppl., 1: 61-65.
Search in Google Scholar
Halachmi I., Metz J.H.M., Van’t Land A., Halachmi S., Kleijnen J.P.C. (2002). Case study: Optimal facility allocation inarobotic milking barn. Transactions of the ASAE, 45 (5): 1539-1546.
Search in Google Scholar
Jones J.B., Wathes C.M., White R.P., Jones R.B. (2000). Do pigs findafamiliar odorant attractive in novel surroundings? Appl. Anim. Beh. Sci., 70: 115-126.10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00149-0
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Kelly H.R.C., Bruce J.M., English P.R., Fowler V.R., Edwards S.A. (2000). Behaviour of 3-week weaned pigs in straw-flow, deep straw and flatdeck housing systems. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 68: 269-280.10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00109-X10844152
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Leroy T., Vranken E., Aerts J.-M., Silva M., Struelens E., Sonck B., Berck-mans D. (2004). Areal-time computer vision system for the quantification of animal behaviour and motor function. Proc. Third International Workshop on Smart Sensors in Livestock. Book of Abstracts.
Search in Google Scholar
Leroy T., Vranken E., Van Brecht A., Struelens E., Sonck B., Berckmans D. (2006). Acomputer vision method for on-line behavioural quantification of individually caged poultry. Trans. ASABE, 49: 795-802.10.13031/2013.20462
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Lyons C.A.P., Bruce J.M., Fowler V.R. (1995). Acomparison of productivity and welfare of growing pigs in four intensive systems. Livest. Prod. Sci., 43: 265-274.10.1016/0301-6226(95)00050-U
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Melotti L., Oostindjer M., Bolhuis J.E., Held S., Mendl M. (2011). Coping personality type and environmental enrichment affect aggression at weaning in pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 140: 137-145.
Search in Google Scholar
Meunier- Salaun M.C., Vantrimponte M.N., Raab A., Dantzer R. (1987). Effect of floor area restriction upon performance behaviour and physiology of growing-finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci., 64: 1371-1377.
Search in Google Scholar
Morag I., Edan Y., Maltz E. (2001). An individual feed allocation decision support system for the dairy farm. J. Agr. Eng. Res., 79 (2): 167-176.
Search in Google Scholar
Nowicki J., Kopyra M., Klocek C. (2007). The behavioural reaction of weaners to hanging toys: wooden ball and aromatized wooden ball - way to reduce aggression after mixing. J. Cent. Eur. Agr., 4: 447-452.
Search in Google Scholar
Nowicki J., Klocek C. (2012). The effect of aromatized environmental enrichment in pen on social relations and behavioural profile of newly mixed weaners. Ann. Anim. Sci., 12: 403-412.
Search in Google Scholar
O ’ Connell N.E., Beattie V.E. (1999). Influence of environmental enrichment on aggressive behaviour and dominance relationships in growing pigs. Anim. Welfare, 8: 269-279.
Search in Google Scholar
Petersen V., Simonsen H.B., Lawson L.G. (1995). The effect of environmental stimulation on the development of behaviour in pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 45: 215-224.10.1016/0168-1591(95)00631-2
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Rodarte L.F., Ducoing A., Galindo F., Romano M.C., Valdez R.A. (2004). The effect of environmental manipulation on behaviour, salivary cortisol and growth of piglets weaned at 14 days of age. J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci., 7: 171-179.
Search in Google Scholar
Schaefer A.L., Salomons M.O., Tong A.K.W., Sather A.P., Lepage P. (1990). The effect of environment enrichment on aggression in newly weaned pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 27: 41-52.10.1016/0168-1591(90)90006-Y
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Scott K., Taylor L., Gill B.P., Edwards S.A. (2009). Influence of different types of environmental enrichment on the behaviour of finishing pigs in two different housing systems. 3. Hanging toy versus rootable toy of the same material. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 116: 186-190.10.1016/j.applanim.2008.07.002
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Spicer H.M., Aherne F.X. (1987). The effects of group size/stocking density on weanling pig performance and behavior. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 19: 89-98.10.1016/0168-1591(87)90206-1
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Trickett S.L., Guy J.H., Edwards S.A. (2009). The role of novelty in environmental enrichment for the weaned pig. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 116: 45-51.10.1016/j.applanim.2008.07.007
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Vande Weerd H.A., Day J.E.L. (2009). Areview of environmental enrichment for pigs housed in intensive housing systems. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 116: 1-20.10.1016/j.applanim.2008.08.001
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Vande Weerd H.A., Docking C.M., Day J.E., Avery P.J., Edwards S.A. (2003). Asystematic approach towards developing environmental enrichment for pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 84: 101-11810.1016/S0168-1591(03)00150-3
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Vande Weerd H.A., Docking C.M., Day J.E.L., Breuer K., Edwards S.A. (2006). Effects of species-relevant environmental enrichment on the behaviour and productivity of finishing pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 99: 230-247.10.1016/j.applanim.2005.10.014
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Vande Weerd H.A., Docking C.M., Day J.E.L., Edwards S.A. (2005). The development of harmful social behaviour in pigs with intact tails and different enrichment backgrounds in two housing systems. Anim. Sci., 80: 289-298.
Search in Google Scholar
Viazzi S., Ismayilova G., Sonoda L.T., Oczak M., Leroy T., Costa A., Bahr C., Guarino M., Fels M., Hartung J.,vanden Berg G., Vranken E., Berck-mans D. (2011). Labelling of video images: the first step to develop an automatic monitoring tool of pig aggression. Proc. 15th ISAH Congress, Vienna, Austria, 3-7.06.2011.
Search in Google Scholar
Wood - Gush D.G.M., Beilharz R.G. (1983). The enrichment ofabare environment for animals in confined conditions. Appl. Anim. Ethol., 10: 209-217.10.1016/0304-3762(83)90142-6
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Wood - Gush D.G.M., Vestergaard K. (1991). The seeking of novelty and its relation to play. Anim. Behav., 42: 599-606.10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80243-X
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Zonderland J.J., Vermeer H.M., Ter Avest A., Vereijken P.F.G., Spoolder H.A.M. (2003). Measuringapig’s preference for suspended toys by using an automated recording technique. Proc. Int. Symp. C.I.G.R. Animal Welfare Considerations in Livestock Housing Systems, Second Technical Section, pp. 147-156.
Search in Google Scholar
Zonderland J.J., Wolthuis - Fillerup M.,van Reene C.G., Bracke M.B.M., Kemp B.,den Hartog L.A., Spoolder H.A.M. (2008). Prevention and treatment of tailbiting in weaned piglets. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 110: 269-281.10.1016/j.applanim.2007.04.005
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar

Abstract

Paradigm

My account