Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
On Strict Ranking by Pairwise Comparisons Cover

On Strict Ranking by Pairwise Comparisons

Open Access
|Apr 2026

References

  1. D. Bartl and J. Ramík, A new algorithm for computing priority vector of pairwise comparisons matrix with fuzzy elements, Inform. Sci. 615 (2022), 103–117.
  2. S. Bozóki and T. Rapcsák, On Saaty’s and Koczkodaj’s inconsistencies of pairwise comparison matrices, J. Global Optim. 42 (2008), no. 2, 157–175.
  3. E.U. Choo and W.C. Wedley, A common framework for deriving preference values from pairwise comparison matrices, Comput. Oper. Res. 31 (2004), no. 6, 893–908.
  4. J.M. Colomer, Ramon Llull: from ‘Ars electionis’ to social choice theory, Soc. Choice Welf. 40 (2013), no. 2, 317–328.
  5. A. Darko, A.P.C. Chan, E.E. Ameyaw, E.K. Owusu, E. Pärn, and D.J. Edwards, Review of application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in construction, Int. J. Constr. Manag. 19 (2019), no. 5, 436–452.
  6. A. Ellingsen, D. Lundholm, and J.-P. Magnot, “The six blind men and the elephant”: an interdisciplinary selection of measurement features, in: P. Kielanowski et al. (eds.), Geometric Methods in Physics XL,Workshop, Białowieża, Poland, 2023, Trends Math., Birkhäuser/Springer, Cham, 2024, pp. 275–307.
  7. E.R. Fadell and S.Y. Husseini, Geometry and Topology of Configuration Spaces, Springer Monogr. Math., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001.
  8. J. Fülöp, A method for approximating pairwise comparison matrices by consistent matrices, J. Global Optim. 42 (2008), no. 3, 423–442.
  9. M. Gromov, Metric Structures for Riemannian and Non-Riemannian Spaces, 2nd ed., Mod. Birkhäuser Class., Birkhäuser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 2007.
  10. K. Ilinski, Gauge geometry of financial markets, J. Phys. A 33 (2000), no. 1, L5–L14.
  11. W.W. Koczkodaj, A new definition of consistency of pairwise comparisons, Math. Comput. Modelling 18 (1993), no. 7, 79–84.
  12. W.W. Koczkodaj, J.-P. Magnot, J. Mazurek, J.F. Peters, H. Rakhshani, M. Soltys, D. Strzałka, J. Szybowski, and A. Tozzi, On normalization of inconsistency indicators in pairwise comparisons, Internat. J. Approx. Reason. 86 (2017), 73–79.
  13. W.W. Koczkodaj and M. Orlowski, An orthogonal basis for computing a consistent approximation to a pairwise comparisons matrix, Comput. Math. Appl. 34 (1997), no. 10, 41–47.
  14. W.W. Koczkodaj, R. Smarzewski, and J. Szybowski, On orthogonal projections on the space of consistent pairwise comparisons matrices, Fund. Inform. 172 (2020), no. 4, 379–397.
  15. K. Kułakowski, K. Grobler-Dębska, and J. Wąs, Heuristic rating estimation: geometric approach, J. Global Optim. 62 (2015), no. 3, 529–543.
  16. K. Kułakowski, J. Mazurek, and M. Strada, On the similarity between ranking vectors in the pairwise comparison method, J. Oper. Res. Soc. 73 (2022), no. 9, 2080–2089.
  17. M. Lahby, L. Cherkaoui, and A. Adib, Network selection decision based on handover history in heterogeneous wireless networks, Int. J. Comput. Sci. Telecom. 3 (2012), no 2, 21–25.
  18. J.-P. Magnot, From configurations to branched configurations and beyond, Res. Rep. Math. 1 (2017), no. 1, Art. ID 1000105, 6 pp.
  19. J.-P. Magnot, A mathematical bridge between discretized gauge theories in quantum physics and approximate reasoning in pairwise comparisons, Adv. Math. Phys. 2018, Art. ID 7496762, 5 pp.
  20. J.-P. Magnot, On mathematical structures on pairwise comparisons matrices with coefficients in an abstract group arising from quantum gravity, Heliyon 5 (2019), no. 6, Art. ID e01821, 12 pp.
  21. J.-P. Magnot, On random pairwise comparisons matrices and their geometry, J. Appl. Anal. 30 (2024), no. 2, 345–361.
  22. J.-P. Magnot, J. Mazurek, and V. Čerňanová, A gradient method for inconsistency reduction of pairwise comparisons matrices, Internat. J. Approx. Reason. 152 (2023), 46–58.
  23. J. Mazurek, C. Pérez Rico, C. Fernández, J.-P. Magnot, and T. Magnot, The 5-item Likert scale and percentage scale correspondence with implications for the use of models with (fuzzy) linguistic variables, Rev. Métodos Cuantitativos Econ. Empresa 31 (2001), 3–16.
  24. T.L. Saaty, A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures, J. Mathematical Psychology 15 (1977), no. 3, 234–281.
  25. S.E. Vázquez and S. Farinelli, Gauge invariance, geometry and arbitrage, J. Invest. Strateg. 1 (2012), no. 2, 23–66.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amsil-2026-0005 | Journal eISSN: 2391-4238 | Journal ISSN: 0860-2107
Language: English
Submitted on: Mar 31, 2025
Accepted on: Mar 2, 2026
Published on: Apr 4, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:

© 2026 Jean-Pierre Magnot, published by University of Silesia in Katowice, Institute of Mathematics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

AHEAD OF PRINT