Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Standardized, virtual patient, and other role-play-based learning approaches for smoking cessation counseling in health care education: A scoping review protocol Cover

Standardized, virtual patient, and other role-play-based learning approaches for smoking cessation counseling in health care education: A scoping review protocol

Open Access
|Sep 2025

References

  1. Cheng CCW, He WJA, Gouda H, Zhang MJ, Luk TT, Wang MP et al. Effectiveness of Very Brief Advice on Tobacco Cessation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Jul;39(9):1721-1734. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08786-8.
  2. Cleland JA, Abe K, Rethans JJ. The use of simulated patients in medical education: AMEE Guide No 42. Med Teach. 2009;31(6):477-486. doi:10.1080/01421590903002821.
  3. Cook DA, Erwin PJ, Triola MM. Computerized virtual patients in health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Med. 2010;85(10):1589-1602. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181edfe13.
  4. Kononowicz AA, Woodham LA, Edelbring S, et al. Virtual Patient Simulations in Health Professions Education: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by the Digital Health Education Collaboration. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(7):e14676. Published 2019 Jul 2. doi:10.2196/14676.
  5. Nestel D, Tabak D, Tierney T, Layat-Burn C, Robb A, Clark S, et al. Key challenges in simulated patient programs: an international comparative case study. BMC Med Educ. 2011;11:69. Published 2011 Sep 25. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-11-69.
  6. Lane C, Rollnick S. The use of simulated patients and role-play in communication skills training: a review of the literature to August 2005. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;67(1-2):13-20. doi:10.1016/j. pec.2007.02.011.
  7. Elfandi S, Poudyal H. Tobacco Cessation Curriculum in Medical Schools: a Scoping Review. J Cancer Educ. 2023 Oct;38(5):1614-1623. doi: 10.1007/s13187-023-02309-5.
  8. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850.
  9. Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Stern C, Tufanaru C, McArthur A, Aromataris E. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x.
  10. Peters MDJ, Marnie C, Tricco AC, Pollock D, Munn Z, Alexander L, et al. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Implement. 2021;19(1):3-10. doi: 10.1097/ XEB.0000000000000277.
  11. Pollock D, Peters MDJ, Khalil H, McInerney P, Alexander L, Tricco AC, et al. Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth. 20231;21(3):520-532. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-22-00123.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amma-2025-0035 | Journal eISSN: 2668-7763 | Journal ISSN: 2668-7755
Language: English
Page range: 246 - 249
Submitted on: Jun 13, 2025
|
Accepted on: Jul 30, 2025
|
Published on: Sep 18, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2025 Valentin Nădășan, Corina Eugenia Budin, Florin Stoica-Buracinschi, Ștefan-Marius Mărușteri, László-Barna Iantovics, published by University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Targu Mures
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.