Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Inter-observer variability on the value of endoscopic images for the documentation of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy - our center experience Cover

Inter-observer variability on the value of endoscopic images for the documentation of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy - our center experience

Open Access
|Jun 2023

References

  1. Idan Levy, MD, GI Fellow Professor, Ian M. Gralnek, MD, MSHS, FASGE, Head of Department; Complications of diagnostic colonoscopy, upper endoscopy, and enteroscopy; Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2016 oct; 30(5):705-718.
  2. Bendtsen F, Skovgaard LT, Sorensen TIet al. Agreement among multiple observers on endoscopic diagnosis of esophageal varices before bleeding. Hepatology 1990;11: 341-347.
  3. Minimal standard terminology in digestive endoscopy. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Endoscopy 2000;32(2):162- 188.
  4. Rey JF, Lambert R. ESGE recommendations for quality control in gastrointestinal endoscopy: guidelines for image documentation in upper and lower GI endoscopy. Endoscopy 2001;33(10):901-903.
  5. Fleiss JL, Levin B, Paik MC (2003) Statistical methods for rates and proportions, 3rd ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
  6. Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman & Hall; 1991. pp 4039.
  7. Hatlebakk JG. Endoscopy in gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Best practice & research Clinical gastroenterology. 2010;24(6):775-786.
  8. Wasielica-Berger J, Kemona A, Kiśluk J, et al. The added value of magnifying endoscopy in diagnosing patients with certain gastresophageal reflux disease. Advances in medical sciences. 2018;63(2):359-366.
  9. Robles-Medranda C, Valero M, Soria-Alcívar M, et al. Detection of minimal mucosal esophageal lesions in non-erosive gastresophageal reflux disease using optical enhancement plus optical magnification. Endoscopy International Open. 2019;7(8):979-986.
  10. Amano Y, Ishimura N, Furuta K, et al. Interobserver agreement on classifying endoscopic diagnoses of nonerosive esophagitis. Endoscopy. 2006 Oct;38(10):1032-1035.
  11. Lovett JK, Gallagher PJ, Rothwell PM. Reproducibility of histological assessment of carotid plaque: implications for studies of carotid imaging. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2004;18(2):117-123.
  12. Orlandi F, Brunelli E, Feliciangeli G, et al. Observer agreement in endoscopic assessment of ulcerative colitis. Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1998;30(5)539-541.
  13. Armstrong D, Bennett JR, Blum AL, et al. The endoscopic assessment of esophagitis: a progress report on observer agreement. Gastroenterology. 1996;111(1):85-92.
  14. Pandolfino JE, Vakil NB, Kahrilas PJ. Comparison of inter- and intraobserver consistency for grading of esophagitis by expert and trainee endoscopists. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002; 56(5):639-643
  15. Lundell LR, Dent J, Bennett JR, et al. Endoscopic assessment of esophagitis: clinical and functional correlates and further validation of the Los Angeles classification. Gut. 1999;45:172-180.
  16. Bytzer P, Havelund T, Hansen JM. Interobserver variation in the endoscopic diagnosis of reflux esophagitis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1993; 28(2):119-125
  17. Anne M, Bjorn S, Eyvind J P. Impact of observer variability on the usefulness of endoscopic images for the documentation of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2007 Sep;42(9):1106-1112.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amma-2023-0015 | Journal eISSN: 2668-7763 | Journal ISSN: 2668-7755
Language: English
Page range: 104 - 108
Submitted on: Jan 31, 2023
Accepted on: Mar 13, 2023
Published on: Jun 30, 2023
Published by: University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Targu Mures
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2023 Ioana Natalia Bernatchi, Septimiu Voidazan, Madalina Ioana Petrut, Gabriella Gabos, Madalin Balasescu, Carmen Nicolau, published by University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Targu Mures
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.