Have a personal or library account? Click to login
An evaluation of concordance between linear measurements obtained from conventional, digital and reconstructed three-dimensional printed orthodontic models: An in vitro study Cover

An evaluation of concordance between linear measurements obtained from conventional, digital and reconstructed three-dimensional printed orthodontic models: An in vitro study

Open Access
|Jan 2023

References

  1. 1. Tarraf NE, Ali DM. Present and the future of digital orthodontics. Semin Orthod. 2018;24:376–385.10.1053/j.sodo.2018.10.002
  2. 2. Christensen LR. Digital workflows in contemporary orthodontics. APOS Trends Orthod 2017;7:12-8.10.4103/2321-1407.199180
  3. 3. Vandenberghe B. The digital patient: imaging science in dentistry. J Dent 2018;74:S21–S26.10.1016/j.jdent.2018.04.01929929585
  4. 4. Hashim HA, Al-Ghamdi S. Tooth width and arch dimensions in normal and malocclusion samples: an odontometric study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2005 May 15;6(2):36-51.10.5005/jcdp-6-2-36
  5. 5. Kasparova M, Grafova L, Dvorak P et al. Possibility of reconstruction of dental plaster cast from 3D digital study models. Biomed Eng Online 2013: 31; 12: 49.10.1186/1475-925X-12-49368661423721330
  6. 6. Cunha TMAD, Barbosa IDS, Palma KK. Orthodontic digital workflow: devices and clinical applications. Dental Press J Orthod. 2021 Dec 15;26(6):e21spe6.10.1590/2177-6709.26.6.e21spe6869035134932716
  7. 7. Kenkare P, Shetty S, Mangal U, Ashith M. V, Shetty S. The Utilization of Three-Dimensional Technology for an Accurate Diagnosis and Precise Treatment Planning in the Field of Orthodontics. Biomed Pharmacol J 2021;14(4):2010-7.10.13005/bpj/2307
  8. 8. Joffe L. OrthoCAD: digital models for a digital era. J Orthod. 2004 Dec;31(4):344-7.10.1179/14653120422502667915608352
  9. 9. Wesemann C, Muallah J, Mah J, Bumann A. Accuracy and efficiency of full-arch digitalization and 3D printing: A comparison between desktop model scanners, an intraoral scanner, a CBCT model scan, and stereolithographic 3D printing. Quintessence Int. 2017;48(1):41-50.
  10. 10. Taneva E, Kusnoto B, Evans CA. 3D Scanning, Imaging, and Printing in Orthodontics: Issues in Contemporary Orthodontics. Prof. Farid Bourzgui (ed.), London, UK, InTech; 2015. [online]. Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/4816510.5772/60010
  11. 11. Groth C, Kravitz ND, Shirck JM. Incorporating three-dimensional printing in orthodontics. J Clin Orthod. 2018 Jan;52(1):28-33. PMID: 29447128.
  12. 12. Maspero C, Tartaglia GM. 3D Printing of Clear Orthodontic Aligners: Where We Are and Where We Are Going. Materials (Basel). 2020 Nov 18;13(22):5204.10.3390/ma13225204769878733217905
  13. 13. Elnagar MH, Aronovich S, Kusnoto B. Digital Workflow for Combined Orthodontics and Orthognathic Surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2020 Feb;32(1):1-14.10.1016/j.coms.2019.08.00431699582
  14. 14. Nikoyan L, Patel R. Intraoral Scanner, Three-Dimensional Imaging, and Three-Dimensional Printing in the Dental Office. Dent Clin North Am. 2020 Apr;64(2):365-378.10.1016/j.cden.2019.12.00432111275
  15. 15. Keim RG. The rise of 3D printers. J Clin Orthod. 2021 Jul;55(7):383. PMID: 34464336.
  16. 16. Hunter WS, Priest P. Errors and discrepancies in measurements of tooth size. J Dent Res 1960;39:405–414.10.1177/0022034560039002230114405477
  17. 17. Rossouw PE, Benatar M, Stander I, Wynchank S. A critical comparison of three methods for measuring dental models. J Dent Assoc S Afr 1991;46:223–226.
  18. 18. Zilberman JH, Parikakis K. Evaluation of the Validity of Tooth Size and Arch Width Measurements Using Conventional and Three-dimensional Virtual Orthodontic Models. Angle Orthodontist. 2003;73, 301-306.
  19. 19. Bell A, Ayoub AF, Siebert P. Assessment of the accuracy of a three dimensional imaging system for archiving dental study models. J Orthod 2003;30:219-23.10.1093/ortho/30.3.21914530419
  20. 20. Houston WJ. The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1983;83:382-90.10.1016/0002-9416(83)90322-66573846
  21. 21. Tian Y, Chen C, Xu X, Wang J, Hou X, Li K, Lu X, Shi H, Lee ES, Jiang HB. A Review of 3D Printing in Dentistry: Technologies, Affecting Factors, and Applications. Scanning. 2021 Jul 17;2021:9950131.10.1155/2021/9950131831336034367410
  22. 22. Zhang ZC, Li PL, Chu FT, Shen G. Influence of the three-dimensional printing technique and printing layer thickness on model accuracy. J Orofac Orthop. 2019 Jul;80(4):194-204.10.1007/s00056-019-00180-y31172199
  23. 23. Igai F, Junior WS, Iegami CM, Neto PT. Assessment of different types of intra oral scanners and 3D printers on the accuracy of printed models: An in vitro study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2021;13(12):e1174-81.10.4317/jced.58765871555834987708
  24. 24. Rebong RE, Stewart KT, Utreja A, Ghoneima AA. Accuracy of three-dimensional dental resin models created by fused deposition modeling, stereolithography, and Polyjet prototype technologies: A comparative study. Angle Orthod. 2018 May;88(3):363-369.10.2319/071117-460.1828831629509023
  25. 25. Hirogaki Y, Sohmura T, Satoh H, Takahashi J, Takada K. Complete 3-D reconstruction of dental cast shape using perceptual grouping. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001;20:1093-101.10.1109/42.95930611686444
  26. 26. Bell A, Ayoub AF, Siebert P. Assessment of the accuracy of a threedimensional imaging system for archiving dental study models. J Orthod 2003;30:219-23.10.1093/ortho/30.3.21914530419
  27. 27. Al-Mashraqi AA, Alhammadi MS, Gadi AA, Altharawi RA, Zamim KAH, Halboub E. Accuracy and reproducibility of permanent dentitions and dental arch measurements: comparing three different digital models with a plaster study cast. Int J Comput Dent. 2021 Dec 21;24(4):353-362.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amma-2022-0028 | Journal eISSN: 2668-7763 | Journal ISSN: 2668-7755
Language: English
Page range: 159 - 163
Submitted on: Aug 5, 2022
|
Accepted on: Oct 28, 2022
|
Published on: Jan 7, 2023
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2023 Shravan Shetty, Srikant Natarajan, Supriya Nambiar, Prithvi Shetty, Kavery Chengappa, Mukul Shetty, published by University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Targu Mures
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.