Abstract
Objective: The United States Food and Drug Administration implemented two exclusivity programs Competitive generic therapy and Patent Challenge exclusivity to develop generic drugs, which provide a 180-day monopoly market for first generic applicants in the United States of America. The aim of the present study is to find the root cause of failures in developing and filing the first generic drugs under these exclusivities and to compare both the exclusivities to find the merits and demerits.
Methods: We used descriptive statistics for data analysis of both the exclusivities and Risk assessment was conducted on 14 industries to find the root cause of failures in every stage of the approval procedure by FMECA (Failure mode, Effects and Criticality Analysis).
Results: We found 44% of rejections in competitive generic therapy drugs and 30% of rejections in patent challenge exclusivity drugs. The risk analysis conducted on failures found that, in drug selection, 6% of failures are occurred due to rare diseases. In drug development, 9% of failures are occurred due to formulation failures. In pre-approval, 10% of failures are occurred due to secondary patents. In post-approval, 6% of failures are occurred due to product changes after approval.
Conclusion: We hope this study can give an idea for small and medium companies in developing countries for the early development of generic drugs for life-threatening diseases.