Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Controls in Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Based Techniques Cover

Controls in Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Based Techniques

Open Access
|Sep 2020

References

  1. 1. Saiki RK, Scharf S, Faloona F, et al. Enzymatic amplification of β-globin genomic sequences and restriction site analysis for diagnosis of sickle cell anemia. Science (80- ). 1985 Dec 20;230(4732):1350–4.10.1126/science.29999802999980
  2. 2. Pavón MÁ, López-Calleja IM, González I, Martín R, García T. Targeting conserved genes in Alternaria species. In: Methods in Molecular Biology. Humana Press Inc.; 2017. p. 123–9.10.1007/978-1-4939-6707-0_627924533
  3. 3. Bustin SA, Benes V, Garson JA, et al. The MIQE Guidelines: Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments. Clin Chem. 2009 Apr 1;55(4):611–22.10.1373/clinchem.2008.11279719246619
  4. 4. Bustin SA, Wittwer CT. MIQE: A Step Toward More Robust and Reproducible Quantitative PCR. Clin Chem. 2017 Sep 1;63(9):1537–8.10.1373/clinchem.2016.26895328606913
  5. 5. Witte AK, Sickha R, Mester P, Fister S, Schoder D, Rossmanith P. Essential role of polymerases for assay performance – Impact of polymerase replacement in a well-established assay. Biomol Detect Quantif. 2018 Dec 1;16:12–20.10.1016/j.bdq.2018.10.002628753730560063
  6. 6. Mojtahedi M, Fouquier D’h´Eroü El A, Huang S. Direct elicitation of template concentration from quantification cycle (C q ) distributions in digital PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:126.10.1093/nar/gku603417634525104023
  7. 7. Czurda S, Smelik S, Preuner-Stix S, Nogueira F, Lion T. Occurrence of fungal DNA contamination in PCR reagents: Approaches to control and decontamination. J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Jan 1;54(1):148–52.10.1128/JCM.02112-15470271226560539
  8. 8. Buzard GS, Baker D, Wolcott MJ, Norwood DA, Dauphin LA. Multi-platform comparison of ten commercial master mixes for probe-based real-time polymerase chain reaction detection of bioterrorism threat agents for surge preparedness. Forensic Sci Int. 2012 Nov 30;223(1–3):292-7.10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.10.00323107058
  9. 9. Johnston AD, Lu J, Ru K lin, Korbie D, Trau M. PrimerROC: accurate condition-independent dimer prediction using ROC analysis. Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 1;9(1):1–14.10.1038/s41598-018-36612-9633877130659212
  10. 10. Laible M, Schlombs K, Kaiser K, et al. Technical validation of an RT-qPCR in vitro diagnostic test system for the determination of breast cancer molecular subtypes by quantification of ERBB2, ESR1, PGR and MKI67 mRNA levels from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast tumor specimens. BMC Cancer. 2016 Jul 7;16(1):398.10.1186/s12885-016-2476-x493630027389414
  11. 11. Abbott RealTime SARS-CoV-2 Assay (EUA), [Internet]. Available from: molecular.abbott.com, [Accessed 25 July 2020].
  12. 12. Cobas® SARS-CoV-2 Test, [Internet]. Available from: diagnostics.roche.com, [Accessed 25 July 2020].
  13. 13. TaqPath COVID-19 CE-IVD RT-PCR Kit Frequently Asked Questions, Version 1.0, [Internet]. Available from: thermofisher.com, [Accessed 25 July 2020].s
  14. 14. Picard-Meyer E, Peytavin de Garam C, Schereffer JL, Robardet E, Cliquet F. Evaluation of six TaqMan RT-rtPCR kits on two thermocyclers for the reliable detection of rabies virus RNA. J Vet Diagnostic Investig. 2019 Jan 12;31(1):47–57.10.1177/1040638718818223650576730541405
  15. 15. Pavšič J, Žel J, Milavec M. Assessment of the real-time PCR and different digital PCR platforms for DNA quantification. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2016 Jan 31;408(1):107–21.10.1007/s00216-015-9107-2470684626521179
  16. 16. Lion T. Current recommendations for positive controls in RT-PCR assays. Leukemia. 2001 Jul 19;15(7):1033–7.10.1038/sj.leu.240213311455970
  17. 17. Ruhanya V, Jacobs GB, Glashoff RH, Engelbrecht S. Clinical relevance of total HIV DNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cell compartments as a biomarker of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND). Vol. 9, Viruses. MDPI AG; 2017. p. 324.10.3390/v9110324570753129088095
  18. 18. Gomez LF, Torres IP, Del Pilar M, et al. Detection of Histoplasma capsulatum in Organic Fertilizers by Hc100 Nested Polymerase Chain Reaction and Its Correlation with the Physicochemical and Microbiological Characteristics of the Samples. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018;98(5):1303–12.10.4269/ajtmh.17-0214595335229532772
  19. 19. Wagner EM. Monitoring gene expression: Quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Methods Mol Biol. 2013;1027:19–45.10.1007/978-1-60327-369-5_223912981
  20. 20. Buckwalter SP, Sloan LM, Cunningham SA, et al. Inhibition controls for qualitative real-time PCR assays: Are they necessary for all specimen matrices? J Clin Microbiol. 2014 Jun 1;52(6):2139–43.10.1128/JCM.03389-13404277524740078
  21. 21. Roux G, Ravel C, Varlet-Marie E, Jendrowiak R, Bastien P, Sterkers Y. Inhibition of polymerase chain reaction: Pathogen-specific controls are better than human gene amplification. Marangoni A, editor. PLoS One. 2019 Sep 27;14(9):e0219276.10.1371/journal.pone.0219276676467731560697
  22. 22. Miranda JA, Steward GF. Variables influencing the efficiency and interpretation of reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR): An empirical study using Bacteriophage MS2. J Virol Methods. 2017 Mar 1;241:1–10.10.1016/j.jviromet.2016.12.00227940257
  23. 23. Liu J, Gratz J, Amour C, et al. Optimization of Quantitative PCR Methods for Enteropathogen Detection. Chan KH, editor. PLoS One. 2016 Jun 23;11(6):e0158199.10.1371/journal.pone.0158199491895227336160
  24. 24. Aralar A, Yuan Y, Chen K, et al. Improving quantitative power in digital PCR through digital high-resolution melting. J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Jun 1;58(6).10.1128/JCM.00325-20726939432295887
  25. 25. Schwaber J, Andersen S, Nielsen L. Shedding light: The importance of reverse transcription efficiency standards in data interpretation. Biomol Detect Quantif. 2019;17:100077.10.1016/j.bdq.2018.12.002637495030805297
  26. 26. De Spiegelaere W, Dern-Wieloch J, Weigel R, et al. Reference Gene Validation for RT-qPCR, a Note on Different Available Software Packages. Cotterill S, editor. PLoS One. 2015 Mar 31;10(3):e0122515.10.1371/journal.pone.0122515438043925825906
  27. 27. Pharo HD, Andresen K, Berg KCG, Lothe RA, Jeanmougin M, Lind GE. A robust internal control for high-precision DNA methylation analyses by droplet digital PCR. Clin Epigenetics. 2018 Feb 21;10(1):24.10.1186/s13148-018-0456-5582255829484034
  28. 28. Neduvat AC, Murthy PM, Sundarrajan S, Padmanabhan S. Use of coagulation factor XIII (F13) gene as an internal control for normalization of genomic DNA’s for HLA typing. MethodsX. 2018 Jan 1;5:881–9.10.1016/j.mex.2018.07.020610788930151348
  29. 29. Caracausi M, Piovesan A, Antonaros F, Strippoli P, Vitale L, Pelleri MC. Systematic identification of human housekeeping genes possibly useful as references in gene expression studies. Mol Med Rep. 2017 Sep 1;16(3):2397–410.10.3892/mmr.2017.6944554805028713914
  30. 30. Glöckner FO, Yilmaz P, Quast C, et al. 25 years of serving the community with ribosomal RNA gene reference databases and tools. Vol. 261, Journal of Biotechnology. Elsevier B.V.; 2017. p. 169–76.10.1016/j.jbiotec.2017.06.119828648396
  31. 31. Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, et al. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol. 2002 Jun 18;3(7):research0034.1.10.1186/gb-2002-3-7-research003412623912184808
  32. 32. Mestdagh P, Van Vlierberghe P, De Weer A, et al. A novel and universal method for microRNA RT-qPCR data normalization. Genome Biol. 2009 Jun 16;10(6):R64.10.1186/gb-2009-10-6-r64271849819531210
  33. 33. Pfaffl MW, Tichopad A, Prgomet C, Neuvians TP. Determination of stable housekeeping genes, differentially regulated target genes and sample integrity: BestKeeper - Excel-based tool using pair-wise correlations. Biotechnol Lett. 2004 Mar;26(6):509–15.10.1023/B:BILE.0000019559.84305.47
  34. 34. Andersen CL, Jensen JL, Ørntoft TF. Normalization of real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR data: A model-based variance estimation approach to identify genes suited for normalization, applied to bladder and colon cancer data sets. Cancer Res. 2004 Aug 1;64(15):5245–50.10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-049615289330
  35. 35. Hruz T, Wyss M, Docquier M, et al. RefGenes: Identification of reliable and condition specific reference genes for RT-qPCR data normalization. BMC Genomics. 2011 Mar 21;12(1):156.10.1186/1471-2164-12-156307295821418615
  36. 36. Gao Z, Deng W, Zhu F. Reference gene selection for quantitative gene expression analysis in black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens). Bhat SA, editor. PLoS One. 2019 Aug 16;14(8):e0221420.10.1371/journal.pone.0221420669732931419256
  37. 37. Leal MF, Belangero PS, Figueiredo EA, et al. Identification of Suitable Reference Genes for Gene Expression Studies in Tendons from Patients with Rotator Cuff Tear. Datti A, editor. PLoS One. 2015 Mar 13;10(3):e0118821.10.1371/journal.pone.0118821435892125768100
  38. 38. Rho HW, Lee BC, Choi ES, Choi IJ, Lee YS, Goh SH. Identification of valid reference genes for gene expression studies of human stomach cancer by reverse transcription-qPCR. BMC Cancer. 2010 May 28;10(1):240.10.1186/1471-2407-10-240288740320507635
  39. 39. Montero-Melendez T, Perretti M. Gapdh gene expression is modulated by inflammatory arthritis and is not suitable for qPCR normalization. Inflammation. 2014 Feb 4;37(4):1059–69.10.1007/s10753-014-9829-x24493325
  40. 40. Al-Sabah A, Stadnik P, Gilbert SJ, Duance VC, Blain EJ. Importance of reference gene selection for articular cartilage mechanobiology studies. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2016 Apr 1;24(4):719–30.10.1016/j.joca.2015.11.007481945126585242
  41. 41. Lee EJ, Schmittgen TD. Comparison of RNA assay methods used to normalize cDNA for quantitative real-time PCR. Anal Biochem. 2006;357:299–301.10.1016/j.ab.2006.06.01116930526
  42. 42. Ho-Pun-Cheung A, Cellier D, Lopez-Crapez E. La RT-qPCR en oncologïe: Considérations pour la normalisation. Vol. 66, Annales de Biologie Clinique. Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2008. p. 121–9.
  43. 43. Libus J, Štorchová H. Quantification of cDNA generated by reverse transcription of total RNA provides a simple alternative tool for quantitative RT-PCR normalization. Biotechniques. 2006 Aug 21;41(2):156–64.10.2144/00011223216925017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amma-2020-0025 | Journal eISSN: 2668-7763 | Journal ISSN: 2668-7755
Language: English
Page range: 79 - 82
Submitted on: Aug 17, 2020
|
Accepted on: Sep 6, 2020
|
Published on: Sep 29, 2020
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2020 Elena Moldovan, Valeriu Moldovan, published by University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Targu Mures
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.