Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Evaluation of the Apical Seal after Root Canal Cleaning and Shaping with Two Nickel-Titanium Systems Cover

Evaluation of the Apical Seal after Root Canal Cleaning and Shaping with Two Nickel-Titanium Systems

Open Access
|Dec 2019

References

  1. 1. Berutti E, Chiandussi G, Paolino DS, Scoti N, Cantatore G, Castellucci A, Pasqualini D. Canal shaping with Wave One Primary reciprocating files and ProTaper system: A comparative study. J of Endod. 2012; 38(4): 505-509.10.1016/j.joen.2011.12.04022414838
  2. 2. Piati DCK, Pereira KFS, Ramos CRV, Ferreira LC, Arashiro FN, Zafalon EJ. Evaluation of filling techniques for canals instrumented with the reciproc system. Pesq Bras Odontoped Clin Integr. 2013; 13(2):205-212.10.4034/PBOCI.2013.132.10
  3. 3. Carvalho EM, Carnevalli B. Analysis of the alteration root canal curvature before and after the preparation of for manual and rotatory technique. Rev Odontol UNESP. 2013; 41(5):335-339.
  4. 4. Bane K, Faye B, Sarr M, Niang SO, Ndiaye D, Machtou P. Root canal shaping by single-file systems and rotary instruments: A laboratory study. Iran Endod J. 2015; 10(2):135-139.
  5. 5. Semaan FS, Fagundes FS, Haragushiku G, Leonardi DP, Baratto Filho F. Mechanized endodontic: The evolution of continuous rotary systems. Rev Sul-Bras Odontol. 2009; 6(3):297-309.
  6. 6. Yared G. Canal preparation using only one Ni-Ti rotary instrument: Preliminary observations. Int Endod J. 2008; 41(4):339-344.10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01351.x18081803
  7. 7. Ruddle J. Endodontic Canal Preparation : Wave-One Single- Files Techniques. JOE. 2012; 3 (6): 1-7.
  8. 8. Ahn SY, Kim HC, Kim E. Kinematic effects of nickel-titanium instruments with reciprocating or continuous rotation motion: A systematic review of in vitro studies. J Endod. 2016; 42(7):1009-1017.10.1016/j.joen.2016.04.00227185740
  9. 9. Zmener O, Pamerjar CH, Macri E. Evaluation of the apical seal in root canals prepared with new rotary system and obturated with amethacrylate based endodontic sealer. An in vitro study. J Endod. 2005; 31(5): 392-395.10.1097/01.don.0000145424.99418.ad15851936
  10. 10. Nevares G, de Albuquerque DS, Freire LG, Romeiro K, Fogel HM, dos Santos M. Efficacy of ProTaper NEXT compared with Reciproc in removing obturation material from severely curved root canals: A microcomputed tomography study. J Endod. 2016; 42(5):803-808.10.1016/j.joen.2016.02.01027117757
  11. 11. Capar ID, Arslan H, Ertas H, Saygılı G. Effectiveness of ProTaper Universal retreatment instruments used with rotary or reciprocating adaptive motion in the removal of root canal filling material. Int Endod J.2015; 48(1):79-83.10.1111/iej.1227924627969
  12. 12. Capar ID, Arslan H, Akcay M, Erats H. An in vitro comparison of apically extruded debris and instrumentation times with ProTaper Univerasal, ProTaper Next, Twisted File Adaptative and HyFlex instruments. J Endod. 2014; 40(10):1638-1641.10.1016/j.joen.2014.04.00425260737
  13. 13. Pawar AM, Pawar MG, Metzger Z, Kokate SR. Self-adjusting file instrumentation results in less debris extrusion apically when compared to Wave One and ProTaper Next. J Conserv Dent. 2015; 18(2): 89-93.10.4103/0972-0707.153057437966525829683
  14. 14. Taha NA, Ozawa T, Messer HH. Comparison of three techniques for preparing oval-shaped root canals. J Endod. 2010; 36(3):532-535.10.1016/j.joen.2009.11.01520171378
  15. 15. Adorno GG, Yoshioka T, Suda H. Crack initiation on the apical root surfaces caused by three different nickel-titanium rotary files at different working lengths. J Endod. 2011; 37: 522-525.10.1016/j.joen.2010.12.00221419302
  16. 16. Gavini G, Caldeira CL, Akisue E, Candeiro GT, Kawakami DA. Resistance to flexural fatigue of reciproc R25 files under continuous rotation and reciprocating movement. J Endod. 2012; 38(5):684-687.10.1016/j.joen.2011.12.03322515903
  17. 17. De Deus G, Leal Vieira VT, Nogueira da Silva EJ, Lopes H, Elias CN, Moreira EJ. Bending resistance and dynamics and static cyclic fatigue life of Reciproc and WaveOne large instruments. J Endod. 2014; 40(4):575-579.10.1016/j.joen.2013.10.01324666915
  18. 18. Jeon HJ, Paranjpe A, Ha HH, Kim E, Lee W, Kim HC. Apical enlargement according to different pecking times at working length using reciprocating files. J Endod. 2014; 40(2):281-284.10.1016/j.joen.2013.08.02024461419
  19. 19. Fayyad DM, Elhakim Elgendy AA. Cutting efficiency of twisted versus machined nickel-titanium endodontic files. J Endod. 2011; 37(8):1143-1146.10.1016/j.joen.2011.03.03621763910
  20. 20. Diognardi M, Troiana G, Laino L, LoRusso L, Giannatempo G, Lauritano F, Cicciu M, LaMuzio L. ProTaper and WaveOne systems three-dimensional comparison of device parameters after the shaping technique. A micro-CT study on simulated root canals. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015; 8(10): 17830-17834.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amma-2019-0019 | Journal eISSN: 2668-7763 | Journal ISSN: 2668-7755
Language: English
Page range: 135 - 139
Submitted on: Jul 1, 2019
Accepted on: Aug 3, 2019
Published on: Dec 31, 2019
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2019 Amalia Abageru, Mihai Pop, Monika Kovács, Alexandra Stoica, Monica Monea, published by University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Targu Mures
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.