Have a personal or library account? Click to login
General Characteristics and Quality of Stroke-Related Online Information – A Cross-Sectional Assessment of the Romanian and Hungarian Websites Cover

General Characteristics and Quality of Stroke-Related Online Information – A Cross-Sectional Assessment of the Romanian and Hungarian Websites

Acta Marisiensis - Seria Medica
Volume 64 (2018): Issue 3 (September 2018)
By: Septimiu Daniel Popescu,  Alex Otniel Popescu,  Mihaela Dănilă,  Mihaela Dobria,  David Maior and  Valentin Nădăşan  
Open Access
|Sep 2018

References

  1. 1. Andreassen HK, Bujnowska-Fedak MM, Chronaki CE et al. European citizens’ use of E-health services: a study of seven countries. BMC Public Health. 2007;10:53.10.1186/1471-2458-7-53185592317425798
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. 2. Fox S, Duggan M. Health Online 2013. Pew Internet Project. Online: http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/PIP_HealthOnline.pdf Accessed: 29.07.2018.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. 3. Statista.com. Share of Europeans who use the internet to search for health-related information in 2014. Online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/451258/internet-use-for-health-related-information-europe/ Accessed: 29.07.2018.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. 4. Hoffmann D, Schwartz J. Stopping deceptive health claims: the need for a private right of action under federal law. Am J Law Med. 2016;42:53-84.10.1177/009885881664471527263263
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. 5. Eysenbach G, Powell J, Kuss O, Sa ER. Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review. JAMA. 2002;287:2691-2700.10.1001/jama.287.20.269112020305
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. 6. Nădăşan V. The Quality of Online Health-Related Information - an Emergent Consumer Health Issue. Acta Medica Marisiensis. 2016;62:408-421.10.1515/amma-2016-0048
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. 7. Santana S, Lausen B, Bujnowska-Fedak M, Chronaki CE, Prokosch HU, Wynn R. Informed citizen and empowered citizen in health: results from an European survey. BMC Fam Pract. 2011;12:20.10.1186/1471-2296-12-20310111821496309
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. 8. Nădășan V. Should Critical Care Professionals Take Hoaxes/Rumours Seriously? J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures). 2016;2:205-206.10.1515/jccm-2016-0030
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. 9. Johnson W, Onuma O, Owolabic M, Sachde S. Stroke: a global response is needed . Online: http://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/94/9/16-181636/en/. Accessed: 30.07.2018.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. 10. CDC. Stroke Facts-Stroke Statistics, 2017. Online: https://www.cdc.gov/stroke/facts.htm. Accessed: 30.07.2018.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. 11. Nădăşan V, Roşca AN, Tarcea M, Ábrám Z, Măruşteri M. The Quality of Romanian Breast Cancer Websites: a Five-Year Longitudinal Assessment. J Cancer Educ. 2018;33:703-707.10.1007/s13187-016-1145-827888472
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. 12. Nădăşan V, Moldovan O. The Completeness and Accuracy of Information about Coeliac Disease on the Romanian Websites. Journal of Applied Quantitative Methods. 2016;11:70-76.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. 13. Nădăşan V, Vancea G, Georgescu PA, Tarcea M, Abram Z. The credibility, completeness and accuracy of information about first aid in case of choking on the Romanian Websites. Journal of Applied Quantitative Methods. 2011;6:18-26.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. 14. Nădăşan V, Moldovan G, Tarcea M, Ureche R. Edified or confused? How complete and accurate is the information about vitamin B12 on the Romanian Websites? Revista de Igienă şi Sănătate Publică, Timişoara. 2011;61:49-57.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. 15. Nădăşan V, Voidăzan S, Tarcea M, Ureche R. The quality of information about influenza on the Romanian Internet. Acta Medica Transilvanica. 2011;2:312-4.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. 16. Unal B, Critchley JA, Capewell S. Missing, mediocre, or merely obsolete? An evaluation of UK data sources for coronary heart disease. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003;57:530-5.10.1136/jech.57.7.530173250212821703
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. 17. Ching T, Roake JA, Lewis DR. Net-based information on varicose vein treatments: a tangled web. N Z Med J. 2010;123:9-15.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. 18. Killeen S, Hennessey A, El Hassan Y, et al. Gastric cancer-related information on the Internet: incomplete, poorly accessible, and overly commercial. Am J Surg. 2011;201:171-8.10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.12.01520851373
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. 19. Ream E, Blows E, Scanlon K, Richardson A. An investigation of the quality of breast cancer information provided on the internet by voluntary organisations in Great Britain. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;76:10-5.10.1016/j.pec.2008.11.01919179036
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. 20. Ni Riordain R, McCreary C. Head and neck cancer information on the internet: type, accuracy and content. Oral Oncol. 2009;45:675-7.10.1016/j.oraloncology.2008.10.00619095486
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. 21. López-Jornet P, Camacho-Alonso F. The quality of internet sites providing information relating to oral cancer. Oral Oncol. 2009;45:e95-8.10.1016/j.oraloncology.2009.03.01719457707
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. 22. Dulaney C, Barrett OC, Rais-Bahrami S, Wakefield D, Fiveash J, Dobelbower M. Quality of Prostate Cancer Treatment Information on Cancer Center Websites. Cureus. 2016;8:e580.10.7759/cureus.580487600627226941
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. 23. Lawrentschuk N, Abouassaly R, Hackett N, Groll R, Fleshner NE. Health information quality on the internet in urological oncology: a multilingual longitudinal evaluation. Urology. 2009;74:1058-63.10.1016/j.urology.2009.05.09119758687
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. 24. Ostry A, Young ML, Hughes M. The quality of nutritional information available on popular websites: a content analysis. Health Educ Res. 2008;23:648-55.10.1093/her/cym05017897928
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. 25. Morr S, Shanti N, Carrer A, Kubeck J, Gerling MC. Quality of information concerning cervical disc herniation on the Internet. Spine J. 2010;10:350-4.10.1016/j.spinee.2010.02.00920362253
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. 26. Yermilov I, Chow W, Devgan L, Makary MA, Ko CY. What is the quality of surgery-related information on the internet? Lessons learned from a standardized evaluation of 10 common operations. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207:580-6.10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.04.03418926463
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. 27. Bastos A, Paiva D, Azevedo A. Quality of health information on acute myocardial infarction and stroke in the world wide web. Acta Med Port. 2014;27:223-31.10.20344/amp.404624813491
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. 28. Cerminara C, Santarone ME, Casarelli L, Curatolo P, El Malhany N. Use of the DISCERN tool for evaluating web searches in childhood epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2014;41:119-21.10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.09.05325461201
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. 29. Granka LA, Joachims T, Gay G. Eye-Tracking Analysis of User Behavior in WWW Search. Online: www.cs.cornell.edu/people/tj/publications/granka_etal_04a.pdf. Accessed: 29.07.2018.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amma-2018-0023 | Journal eISSN: 2668-7763 | Journal ISSN: 2668-7755
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 116 - 120
Submitted on: Jul 31, 2018
|
Accepted on: Sep 14, 2018
|
Published on: Sep 25, 2018
Published by: University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Targu Mures
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
e-health,
consumer-health,
health-related information,
stroke,
Eastern-Europe
Related subjects:
Medicine,
Clinical medicine,
Clinical medicine, other

© 2018 Septimiu Daniel Popescu, Alex Otniel Popescu, Mihaela Dănilă, Mihaela Dobria, David Maior, Valentin Nădăşan, published by University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Targu Mures
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 64 (2018): Issue 3 (September 2018)Next article