Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Cross-task code reuse in genetic programming applied to visual learning Cover

Cross-task code reuse in genetic programming applied to visual learning

International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science
Volume 24 (2014): Issue 1 (March 2014)
By:
Open Access
|Mar 2014

References

  1. Bhanu, B., Lin, Y. and Krawiec, K. (2005). Evolutionary Synthesisof Pattern Recognition Systems, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Caruana, R. (1997). Multitask learning, Machine Learning28(1): 41-75.10.1023/A:1007379606734
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Chang, Y.F., Lee, J.C., Mohd Rijal, O. and Syed Abu Bakar, S.A.R. (2010). Efficient online handwritten Chinese character recognition system using a two-dimensional functional relationship model, International Journal of AppliedMathematics and Computer Science 20(4): 727-738, DOI: 10.2478/v10006-010-0055-x.10.2478/v10006-010-0055-x
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Ciresan, D.C., Meier, U. and Schmidhuber, J. (2012). Multi-column deep neural networks for image classification, Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Conferenceon Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition(CVPR), Providence, RI, USA, pp. 3642-3649.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Fabijańska, A. (2012). A survey of subpixel edge detection methods for images of heat-emitting metal specimens, International Journal of Applied Mathematicsand Computer Science 22(3): 695-710, DOI: 10.2478/v10006-012-0052-3.10.2478/v10006-012-0052-3
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Galvan Lopez, E., Poli, R. and Coello Coello, C.A. (2004). Reusing code in genetic programming, in M. Keijzer, U.-M. O’Reilly, S.M. Lucas, E. Costa and T. Soule (Eds.), Genetic Programming-7th European Conference,EuroGP 2004, Proceedings, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3003, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 359-368.10.1007/978-3-540-24650-3_34
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Ghosn, J. and Bengio, Y. (2003). Bias learning, knowledge sharing, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks14(4): 748-765.10.1109/TNN.2003.81060818238057
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P. and Witten, I.H. (2009). The Weka data mining software: An update, SIGKDD Explorations 11(1): 10-18.10.1145/1656274.1656278
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Haynes, T. (1997). On-line adaptation of search via knowledge reuse, in J.R. Koza, K. Deb, M. Dorigo, D.B. Fogel, M. Garzon, H. Iba and R.L. Riolo (Eds.), GeneticProgramming 1997: Proceedings of the Second AnnualConference, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, pp. 156-161.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Holland, J. (1975). Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems, Vol. 1, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Hornby, G.S. and Pollack, J.B. (2002). Creating high-level components with a generative representation for body-brain evolution, Artificial Life 8(3): 223-246.10.1162/10645460232099183712537684
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Howard, D. (2003). Modularization by multi-run frequency driven subtree encapsulation, in R.L. Riolo and B. Worzel (Eds.), Genetic Programming Theory and Practice, Kluwer, New York, NY, Chapter 10, pp. 155-172.10.1007/978-1-4419-8983-3_10
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Howard, D., Roberts, S.C. and Ryan, C. (2006). Pragmatic genetic programming strategy for the problem of vehicle detection in airborne reconnaissance, Pattern RecognitionLetters 27(11): 1275-1288.10.1016/j.patrec.2005.07.025
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Hsu, W.H., Harmon, S.J., Rodriguez, E. and Zhong, C. (2004). Empirical comparison of incremental reuse strategies in genetic programming for keep-away soccer, in M. Keijzer (Ed.), Late Breaking Papers at the 2004 Genetic andEvolutionary Computation Conference, Association for Computing Machinery, Seattle, WA.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Jaśkowski, W., Krawiec, K. and Wieloch, B. (2007a). Genetic programming for cross-task knowledge sharing, in D. Thierens (Ed.), Genetic and Evolutionary ComputationConference GECCO, Association for Computing Machinery, London, pp. 1620-1627.10.1145/1276958.1277281
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Jaśkowski, W., Krawiec, K. and Wieloch, B. (2007b). Knowledge reuse in genetic programming applied to visual learning, in D. Thierens (Ed.), Genetic and EvolutionaryComputation Conference GECCO, Association for Computing Machinery, London, pp. 1790-1797.10.1145/1276958.1277318
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Jaśkowski, W., Krawiec, K. and Wieloch, B. (2007c). Learning and recognition of hand-drawn shapes using generative genetic programming, in M. Giacobini (Ed.), EvoWorkshops2007, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 4448, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 281-290.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Koza, J. (1992). Genetic Programming, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Koza, J.R. (1994). Genetic Programming II: Automatic Discoveryof Reusable Programs, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Koza, J.R., Bennett III, F.H., Andre, D. and Keane, M.A. (1996). Reuse, parameterized reuse, and hierarchical reuse of substructures in evolving electrical circuits using genetic programming, in T. Higuchi (Ed.), Proceedings of InternationalConference on Evolvable Systems: From Biology toHardware (ICES-96), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1259, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Krawiec, K. (2006). Learning high-level visual concepts using attributed primitives and genetic programming, in F. Rothlauf (Ed.), EvoWorkshops 2006, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3907, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 515-519.10.1007/11732242_48
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Krawiec, K. (2007). Generative learning of visual concepts using multiobjective genetic programming, Pattern RecognitionLetters 28(16): 2385-2400.10.1016/j.patrec.2007.08.001
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Krawiec, K. and Bhanu, B. (2005). Visual learning by coevolutionary feature synthesis, IEEE Transactions onSystem, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B 35(3): 409-425.10.1109/TSMCB.2005.846644
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Kurashige, K., Fukuda, T. and Hoshino, H. (2003). Reusing primitive and acquired motion knowledge for gait generation of a six-legged robot using genetic programming, Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems38(1): 121-134. 10.1023/A:1026204313001
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Langdon, W.B. and Poli, R. (2002). Foundations of Genetic Programming, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.10.1007/978-3-662-04726-2
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Li, B., Li, X., Mabu, S. and Hirasawa, K. (2012). Towards automatic discovery and reuse of subroutines in variable size genetic network programming, in X. Li (Ed.), Proceedingsof the 2012 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation,Brisbane, Australia, pp. 485-492.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Louis, S. and McDonnell, J. (2004). Learning with case-injected genetic algorithms, IEEE Transactions on EvolutionaryComputation 8(4): 316-328.10.1109/TEVC.2004.823466
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Luke, S. (2002). ECJ evolutionary computation system, http://cs.gmu.edu/eclab/projects/ecj/.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Mitchell, T.M. (2006). The discipline of machine learning, Technical Report CMU-ML-06-108, Machine Learning Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Montana, D.J. (1993). Strongly typed genetic programming, BBN Technical Report #7866, Bolt Beranek and Newman, Inc., Cambridge, MA.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Moya, M.R., Koch, M.W. and Hostetler, L.D. (1993). One-class classifier networks for target recognition applications, World Congress on Neural Networks, Portland, OR, USA, pp. 797-801.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. O’Sullivan, J. and Thrun, S. (1995). A Robot That ImprovesIts Ability to Learn, Carnegie Mellon University, School of Computer Science, Pittsburgh, PA.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. Poli, R., Langdon, W.B. and McPhee I.N.F. (2008). A field guide to genetic programming, http://www.gp-field-guide.org.uk/.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. Perez, C.B. and Olague, G. (2013). Genetic programming as strategy for learning image descriptor operators, IntelligentData Analysis 17(4): 561-583.10.3233/IDA-130594
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Pratt, L.Y., Mostow, J. and Kamm, C.A. (1991). Direct transfer of learned information among neural networks, Proceedingsof the 9th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence(AAAI-91), Anaheim, CA, USA, pp. 584-589.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Rizki, M.M., Zmuda, M.A. and Tamburino, L.A. (2002). Evolving pattern recognition systems, IEEE Transactionson Evolutionary Computation 6(6): 594-609.10.1109/TEVC.2002.806167
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. Roberts, S.C., Howard, D. and Koza, J.R. (2001). Evolving modules in genetic programming by subtree encapsulation, in J.F. Miller (Ed.), Genetic Programming, Proceedings ofEuroGP’2001, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 2038, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 160-175.10.1007/3-540-45355-5_13
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Rosca, J.P. and Ballard, D.H. (1996). Discovery of subroutines in genetic programming, in P.J.Angeline and K.E.Kinnear, Jr. (Eds.), Advances in Genetic Programming 2,MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, Chapter 9, pp. 177-202.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. Seront, G. (1995). External concepts reuse in genetic programming, in E.V. Siegel and J.R. Koza (Eds.), WorkingNotes for the AAAI Symposium on Genetic Programming, AAAI/MIT, Cambridge, MA, pp. 94-98.
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. Tackett,W.A. (1993). Genetic generation of “dendritic” trees for image classification, Proceedings of theWorld Congress onNeural Networks, Portland, OR, USA, pp. IV 646-649.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. Teller, A. and Veloso, M. (1997). PADO: A new learning architecture for object recognition, in K. Ikeuchi and M. Veloso (Eds.), Symbolic Visual Learning, Oxford Press, New York, NY, pp. 77-112.
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. Trujillo, L. and Olague, G. (2006). Synthesis of interest point detectors through genetic programming, in M. Cattolico (Ed.), Genetic and Evolutionary Computation ConferenceGECCO, Association for Computing Machinery, Seattle, WA, pp. 887-894.10.1145/1143997.1144151
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. Vilalta, R. and Drissi, Y. (2002). A perspective view and survey of meta-learning, Artificial Intelligence Review18(2): 77-95.10.1023/A:1019956318069
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. Whitley, D., Rana, S. and Heckendorn, R. (1999). The island model genetic algorithm: On separability, population size and convergence, Journal of Computing and InformationTechnology 7(1): 33-47.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amcs-2014-0014 | Journal eISSN: 2083-8492 | Journal ISSN: 1641-876X
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 183 - 197
Published on: Mar 25, 2014
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
genetic programming,
code reuse,
knowledge sharing,
visual learning,
multi-task learning,
optical character recognition.
Related subjects:
Mathematics,
Applied mathematics

© 2014 Wojciech Jaśkowski, Krzysztof Krawiec, Bartosz Wieloch, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Previous articleVolume 24 (2014): Issue 1 (March 2014)Next article