Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Actuator fault diagnosis for flat systems: A constraint satisfaction approach

International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science
Volume 23 (2013): Issue 1 (March 2013)
By:
Open Access
|Mar 2013

References

  1. Akhenak, A., Chadli, M., Maquin, D. and Ragot, J. (2003). Sliding mode multiple observer for fault detection and isolation, 42nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control,Maui, HI, USA, Vol. 1, pp. 953-958.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Arangú, M. and Salido, M. (2011). A fine-grained arc-consistency algorithm for non-normalized constraint satisfaction problems, International Journal of AppliedMathematics and Computer Science 21(4): 733-744, DOI: 10.2478/v10006-011-0058-2.10.2478/v10006-011-0058-2
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Berdjag, D., Christophe, C., Cocquempot, V. and Jiang, B. (2006). Nonlinear model decomposition for robust fault detection and isolation using algebraic tools, InternationalJournal of Innovative Computing, Information & Control2(6): 1337-1354.10.1109/CDC.2006.377518
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Bernard, O. and Gouzé, J. (2004). Closed loop observers bundle for uncertain biotechnological models, Journal of ProcessControl 14(7): 765-774.10.1016/j.jprocont.2003.12.006
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Besançon, G. and Zhang, Q. (2002). Further developments on nonlinear adaptive observers with application in fault detection, IFAC World Congress, Barcelona, Spain, Vol. 15, Part 1, pp. 19-22.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Bokor, J. and Balas, G. (2004). Detection filter design for LPV systems: A geometric approach, Automatica40(3): 511-518.10.1016/j.automatica.2003.11.003
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Bokor, J. and Szab, Z. (2009). Fault detection and isolation in nonlinear systems, Annual Reviews in Control33(2): 113-123.10.1016/j.arcontrol.2009.09.001
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Caccavale, F. and Villani, L. (2004). An adaptive observer for fault diagnosis in nonlinear discrete-time systems, American Control Conference, Boston, MA, USA, Vol. 3, pp. 2463-2468.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Chen, J. and Patton, R. (1999). Robust Model-Based Fault Diagnosisfor Dynamic Systems, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA.10.1007/978-1-4615-5149-2_9
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Chen, W., Saif, M. and Soh, Y. (2000). A variable structure adaptive observer approach for actuator fault detection and diagnosis in uncertain nonlinear systems, American ControlConference, Chicago, IL, USA, Vol. 4, pp. 2674-2678.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Corless, M. and Tu, J. (1998). State and input estimation for a class of uncertain systems, Automatica 34(6): 757-764.10.1016/S0005-1098(98)00013-2
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. De Persis, C. and Isidori, A. (2001). A geometric approach to nonlinear fault detection and isolation, IEEE Transactionson Automatic Control 46(6): 853-865.10.1109/9.928586
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. De Persis, C. and Isidori, A. (2002). On the design of fault detection filters with game-theoretic-optimal sensitivity, International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control12(8): 729-747.10.1002/rnc.713
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Ding, S. (2008). Model-based Fault Diagnosis Techniques:Design Schemes, Algorithms, and Tools, Springer, Heidelberg/Berlin.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Ding, X. and Frank, P.M. (1993). An adaptive observer-based fault detection scheme for nonlinear dynamic systems, 12th IFAC World Congress, Sydney, Australia, Vol. 6, pp. 307-310.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Edwards, C. and Spurgeon, S.K. (2000). A sliding mode observer based FDI scheme for the ship benchmark, EuropeanJournal of Control 6(4): 341-356.10.1016/S0947-3580(00)71094-6
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Fagarasana, I., Ploix, S. and Gentil, S. (2004). Causal fault detection and isolation based on a set-membership approach, Automatica 40(12): 2099-2110.10.1016/j.automatica.2004.06.021
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Fliess, M., Levine, J., Martin, P. and Rouchon, P. (1992). Sur les systmes non linaires diffrentiellement plats, Comptesrendus de l’Acadmie des sciences, Srie 1: Mathmatiques315(5): 619-624.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Gouzé, J., Rapaport, A. and Hadj-Sadok, M. (2000). Interval observers for uncertain biological systems, EcologicalModelling 133(1-2): 46-56.10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00279-9
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Grenaille, S., Henry, D. and Zolghadri, A. (2008). A method for designing fault diagnosis filters for LPV polytopic systems, Journal of Control Science and Engineering (1): 1-11.10.1155/2008/231697
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Ha, Q. and Trinh, H. (2004). State and input simultaneous estimation for a class of nonlinear systems, Automatica40(10): 1779-1785.10.1016/j.automatica.2004.05.012
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Hakiki, K., Mazari, B., Liazid, A. and Djaber S. (2006). Fault reconstruction using sliding mode observers, AmericanJournal of Applied Sciences 3(1): 1669-1674.10.3844/ajassp.2006.1669.1674
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Hansen, R. (2004). Global Optimization Using Interval Analysis, 2nd Edn., CRC, New York, NY.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Henry, D. and Zolghadri, A. (2004). Robust fault diagnosis in uncertain linear parameter-varying systems, IEEE InternationalConference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, TheHague, The Netherlands, Vol. 6, pp. 5165-5170.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Hermann, R. and Krener, A.J. (1977). Nonlinear controllability and observability, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control22(5): 728-740.10.1109/TAC.1977.1101601
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Hwang, I., Kim, S., Kim, Y. and Seah, C.E. (2010). A survey of fault detection, isolation, and reconfiguration methods, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology18(3): 636-653.10.1109/TCST.2009.2026285
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Ingimundarson, A., Bravo, J., Puig, V., Alamo, T. and Guerra, P. (2009). Robust fault detection using zonotope-based set-membership consistency test, International Journal ofAdaptive Control and Signal Processing 23(4): 311-330.10.1002/acs.1038
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Isermann, R. and Ball, P. (1997). Trends in the application of model-based fault detection and diagnosis of technical processes, Control Engineering Practice 5(5): 709-719.10.1016/S0967-0661(97)00053-1
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Jaulin, L. (2013). Combining interval analysis with flatness theory for state estimation of sailboat robots, Mathematicsin Computer Sciences 6(4): 347-359.10.1007/s11786-012-0130-9
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Jaulin, L., Kieffer, M., Didrit, O. and Walter, E. (2001). AppliedInterval Analysis, Springer, London.10.1007/978-1-4471-0249-6
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Jaulin, L. and Walter, E. (1993). Set inversion via interval analysis for nonlinear bounded-error estimation, Automatica29(4): 1053-1064.10.1016/0005-1098(93)90106-4
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Jiang, B., Staroswiecki, M. and Cocquempot, V. (2004). Fault estimation in nonlinear uncertain systems using robust/sliding-mode observers, IEE Proceedings ControlTheory and Applications 151(1): 29-37.10.1049/ip-cta:20040074
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. Join, C., Sira-Ramirez, H. and Fliess, M. (2005). Control of an uncertain three-tank system via on-line parameter identification and fault detection, IFAC World Congress,Prague, Czech Republic.10.3182/20050703-6-CZ-1902.01844
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. Kabore, R. and Wang, H. (2001). Design of fault diagnosis filters and fault-tolerant control for a class of nonlinear systems, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control46(11): 1805-1810.10.1109/9.964696
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Korbicz, J., Kościelny, J.M., Kowalczuk, Z. and Cholewa, W. (Eds.) (2004). Fault Diagnosis: Models, Artificial Intelligence,Applications, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg.10.1007/978-3-642-18615-8
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Krantz, S. and Parks, H. (Eds.) (2002). The Implicit FunctionTheorem: History, Theory, and Applications, Birkhäuser, Boston, MA.10.1007/978-1-4612-0059-8_2
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. Lalami, A. and Combastel, C. (2006). Generation of set membership tests for fault diagnosis and evaluation of their worst case sensitivity, 6th IFAC Symposium on Fault Detection,Supervision and Safety of Technical Processes,Beijing, China, pp. 569-574.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Levant, A. (1998). Robust exact differentiation via sliding mode technique, Automatica 34(3): 379-384.10.1016/S0005-1098(97)00209-4
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. Levant, A. (2001). Higher order sliding modes and arbitrary order exact robust differentiation, European Control Conference,Porto, Portugal, pp. 996-1001.
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. Levant, A. (2003). Higher-order sliding modes, differentiation and output-feedback control, International Journal of Control76(9): 924-941.10.1080/0020717031000099029
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. Liu, Y. (2009). Robust adaptive observer for nonlinear systems with unmodeled dynamics, Automatica 45(8): 1891-1895.10.1016/j.automatica.2009.04.002
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. Moisan, M., Bernard, O. and Gouzé, J. (2009). Near optimal interval observers bundle for uncertain bioreactors, Automatica45(1): 291-295.10.1016/j.automatica.2008.07.006
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. Moisan, M. and Bernard, O. (2006). Robust interval observers for uncertain chaotic systems, 45th IEEE Conferenceon Decision and Control, San Diego, CA, USA, pp. 3712-3717.
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. Moore, R. (1966). Interval Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. Neumaier, A. (2004). Complete search in continuous global optimization and constraint satisfaction, Acta Numerica13: 271-369.10.1017/S0962492904000194
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. Orani, N., Pisano, A. and Usai, E. (2009). Fault detection and reconstruction for a three-tank system via high-order sliding-mode observer, IEEE Multi-conference on Systemsand Control (MSC), Saint-Petersburg, Russia, pp. 1714-1719.
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. Poulsen, N. and Niemann, H. (2008). Active fault diagnosis based on stochastic tests, International Journal of AppliedMathematics and Computer Science 18(4): 487-496, DOI: 10.2478/v10006-008-0043-6.10.2478/v10006-008-0043-6
    Search in Google Scholar
  48. Puig, V. (2010). Fault diagnosis and fault tolerant control using set-membership approaches: Application to real case studies, International Journal of Applied Mathematicsand Computer Science 20(4): 619-635, DOI: 10.2478/v10006-010-0046-y.10.2478/v10006-010-0046-y
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. Puig, V., Quevedo, J., Escobet, T. and Stancu, R. (2003). Robust fault detection using linear interval observers, Proceedingsof the 5th IFAC Symposium on Fault Detection, Supervisionand Safety of Technical Processes, SAFEPROCESS2003, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 609-614.
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. Ragot, J., Maquin, D. and Adrot, O. (2006). Parameter uncertainties characterisation for linear models, ComputerJournal: 16-20.10.3182/20060829-4-CN-2909.00096
    Search in Google Scholar
  51. Raïssi, T., Videau, G. and Zolghadri, A. (2010). Interval observer design for consistency checks of nonlinear continuous-time systems, Automatica 46(3): 518-527.10.1016/j.automatica.2009.12.005
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. Sontag, E. and Wang, Y. (1991). I/O equations for nonlinear systems and observation spaces, 30th IEEE Conference onDecision and Control, Brighton, UK, pp. 720-725.
    Search in Google Scholar
  53. Stancu, A., Puig, V., Cuguer, P. and Quevedo, J. (2005). Benchmarking on approaches to interval observation applied to robust fault detection, in C. Jermann, A. Neumaier and D. Sam (Eds.), Global Optimizationand Constraint Satisfaction, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3478, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 336-336.10.1007/11425076_13
    Search in Google Scholar
  54. Theilliol, D., Noura, H. and Ponsart, J. (2002). Fault diagnosis and accommodation of a three-tank system based on analytical redundancy, ISA Transactions 41(3): 365-382.10.1016/S0019-0578(07)60094-9
    Search in Google Scholar
  55. Waltz, D.L. (1975). Generating semantic descriptions from drawings of scenes with shadows, in P.H. Winston (Ed.), The Psychology of Computer Vision, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, pp. 19-91.
    Search in Google Scholar
  56. Wang, H. (2003). Fault diagnosis and fault tolerant control for non-Gaussian stochastic systems with random parameters, in F. Caccavale and L. Villani (Eds.), Fault Diagnosisand Fault Tolerance for Mechatronic Systems: Recent Advances, Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, Vol. 1, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 59-84.10.1007/3-540-45737-2_2
    Search in Google Scholar
  57. Wang, H. and Daley, S. (1996). Actuator fault diagnosis: An adaptive observer-based technique, IEEE Transactions onAutomatic Control 41(7): 1073-1078.10.1109/9.508919
    Search in Google Scholar
  58. Wang, H., Huang, Z. and Daley, S. (1997). On the use of adaptive updating rules for actuator and sensor fault diagnosis, Automatica33(2): 217-225.10.1016/S0005-1098(96)00155-0
    Search in Google Scholar
  59. Wang, H. and Lin, W. (2000). Applying observer based FDI techniques to detect faults in dynamic and bounded stochastic distributions, International Journal of Control73(15): 1424-1436.10.1080/002071700445433
    Search in Google Scholar
  60. Wang, H. and Noriega, R. (2001). Fault diagnosis for unknown non-linear systems via neural networks and its comparisons and combinations with recursive least-squares based techniques, Proceedings of the Institutionof Mechanical Engineers, Part I: Journal of Systemsand Control Engineering 215(3): 261-278.10.1243/0959651011541030
    Search in Google Scholar
  61. Yan, X. and Edwards, C. (2008). Adaptive sliding-mode-observer-based fault reconstruction for nonlinear systems with parametric uncertainties, IEEETransactions on Industrial Electronics 55(11): 4029-4036.10.1109/TIE.2008.2003367
    Search in Google Scholar
  62. Zhang, Q., Basseville, M. and Benveniste, A. (1998). Fault detection and isolation in nonlinear dynamic systems: A combined inputoutput and local approach, Automatica34(11): 1359-1373.10.1016/S0005-1098(98)00085-5
    Search in Google Scholar
  63. Zolghadri, A., Henry, D. and Monsion, M. (1996). Design of nonlinear observers for fault diagnosis: A case study, ControlEngineering Practice 4(11): 1535-1544.10.1016/0967-0661(96)00167-0
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amcs-2013-0014 | Journal eISSN: 2083-8492 | Journal ISSN: 1641-876X
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 171 - 181
Published on: Mar 26, 2013
Published by: University of Zielona Góra
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
fault detection,
input observer,
flat systems,
consistency techniques
Related subjects:
Mathematics,
Applied mathematics

© 2013 Ramatou Seydou, Tarek Raissi, Ali Zolghadri, Denis Efimov, published by University of Zielona Góra
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Previous articleVolume 23 (2013): Issue 1 (March 2013)Next article