Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Aspects on Social Egg Freezing – Current State in Bulgaria Cover

Aspects on Social Egg Freezing – Current State in Bulgaria

Open Access
|Nov 2024

References

  1. Chen C. Pregnancy after human oocyte cryopreservation. Lancet. 1986;1(8486):884-6. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90989-x.
  2. De Proost M, Coene G, Nekkebroeck J, et al. ‘I feel that injustice is being done to me’: a qualitative study of women’s viewpoints on the (lack of) reimbursement for social egg freezing. BMC Med Ethics 23, 35 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-022-00774-z
  3. Borini A, Bonu MA, Coticchio G, et al. Pregnancies and births after oocyte cryopreservation. Fertil Steril. 2004;82(3):601-5. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.04.025.
  4. Benagiano G, Gianaroli L. The new Italian IVF legislation. Re-prod Biomed Online. 2004; 9:117-25
  5. Pai HD, Baid R, Palshetkar NP, et al. Oocyte Cryopreservation – Current Scenario and Future Perspectives: A Narrative Review. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2021;14(4):340-349. doi: 10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_173_21
  6. Stoop D, Ermini B, Polyzos NP, et al. Reproductive potential of a metaphase II oocyte retrieved after ovarian stimulation: an analysis of 23 354 ICSI cycles. Human Reproduction, 2013;28(1),286, https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/des396
  7. Cohen M, Lindheim S, Sauer M. Donor age is paramount to success in oocyte donation. Human Reproduction, 1999;14(11),2755-2758, https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/14.11.2755
  8. Dyulgerova-Nikolova D, Milachich, T. Rare Sperm Freezing. 2021. 10.5772/intechopen.77538.
  9. von Wolff M, Andersen CY, Woodruff TK, Nawroth F. Ferti-PROTEKT, Oncofertility Consortium and the Danish Fertility-Preservation Networks – What Can We Learn From Their Experiences? Clin Med Insights Reprod Health. 2019 Apr 30;13. doi: 10.1177/1179558119845865.
  10. Akhondi MM, Ardakani ZB, Warmelink JC. et al. Knowledge and beliefs about oocyte cryopreservation for medical and social reasons in female students: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Women’s Health, 2023, 23, 336. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02481-2
  11. Gambadauro P, Bränn E, Hadlaczky G. Acceptance and willingness-to-pay for oocyte cryopreservation in medical versus age-related fertility preservation scenarios among Swedish female university students. Sci Rep, 2023, 13, 5325. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32538-z
  12. Fritz R, Jindal S. Reproductive aging and elective fertility preservation. J Ovarian Res, 2018, 11, 66. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-018-0438-4
  13. Pellestor F, et al. Maternal aging and chromosomal abnormalities: new data drawn from in vitro unfertilized human oocytes. 2003;112(2):195-203.
  14. Cobo A, García-Velasco Juan A, Coello A, et al. Oocyte vitri-fication as an efficient option for elective fertility preservation. Fertility and Sterility, 2016;105(3),755-764.e8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.11.027.
  15. Cobo A, García-Velasco Juan A, Remohí J, et al. Oocyte vitri-fication for fertility preservation for both medical and nonmedical reasons, Fertility and Sterility, 2021;115(5), 1091-1101, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.02.006.
  16. Tsafrir A, Holzer H, Miron-Shatz T, et al. Why have women not returned to use their frozen oocytes?’: a 5-year follow-up of women after planned oocyte cryopreservation. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 2021;43(6),1137-1145, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.08.026.
  17. Ben-Rafael, Zion. The dilemma of social oocyte freezing: usage rate is too low to make it cost-effective. Reproductive biomedicine online 37.4 (2018): 443-448.
  18. van Loendersloot, Laura L, et al. Expanding reproductive lifespan: a cost-effectiveness study on oocyte freezing. Human reproduction 26.11 (2011): 3054-3060.
  19. Chen SU, Yang YS. Slow freezing or vitrification of oocytes: their effects on survival and meiotic spindles, and the time schedule for clinical practice. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;48(1):15-22. doi: 10.1016/S1028-4559(09)60030-9.
  20. De Munck N, Verheyen G, Van Landuyt L, et al. Survival and post-warming in vitro competence of human oocytes after high security closed system vitrification. J Assist Re-prod Genet. 2013;30(3):361-9. doi: 10.1007/s10815-013-9930-3.
  21. Kirillova A, Lysenkov S, Farmakovskaya M. et al. Should we transfer poor quality embryos? Fertil Res and Pract 6, 2 2020. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40738-020-00072-5
  22. Kadioglu N, Kahyao÷lu ø, Kaplano÷lu ø, et al. Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes after Poor-Quality Embryo Transfer and Prognostic Parameters. J Clin Med, 2023;12(19):6236. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12196236
  23. Jamil M, Debbarh H, Kabit A, et al. Impact of the number of retrieved oocytes on IVF outcomes: Oocyte maturation, fertilization, embryo quality and implantation rate. Zygote, 2023, 31(1), 91-96. Doi :10.1017/S096719942200065X
  24. Bonte D, Thys V, De Sutter P, et al. Vitrification negatively affects the Ca2+-releasing and activation potential of mouse oocytes, but vitrified oocytes are potentially useful for diagnostic purposes. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 2020;40(1),13-25, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.09.012.
  25. Tsai TE, Lin PH, Lian PF, et al. Artificial oocyte activation may improve embryo quality in older patients with diminished ovarian reserve undergoing IVF-ICSI cycles. J Ovarian Res, 2022, 15, 102. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-022-01036-7
  26. Delbaere I, Verbiest S, Tydén T. Knowledge about the impact of age on fertility: a brief review. Ups J Med Sci. 2020;125(2):167-174. doi: 10.1080/03009734.2019.1707913. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
  27. Teo UL, Kakkar P, El-Toukhy T. Current perspectives on social oocyte freezing, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2022, 42:3, 370-378, DOI: 10.1080 /01443615.2021.1904220
  28. Roque M, Haahr T, Esteves SC, Humaidan P. The POSEIDON stratification – moving from poor ovarian response to low prognosis. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2021;25(2):282-292. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20200100.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amb-2024-0072 | Journal eISSN: 2719-5384 | Journal ISSN: 0324-1750
Language: English
Page range: 14 - 21
Submitted on: May 10, 2024
Accepted on: Oct 2, 2024
Published on: Nov 23, 2024
Published by: Sofia Medical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2024 D. Dyulgerova-Nikolova, I. Antonova, L. Valkova, T. Timeva, M. Yunakova, T. Milachich, published by Sofia Medical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.