Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Modern Digital Intraoral Scanning Systems: A Review Cover

The Modern Digital Intraoral Scanning Systems: A Review

Open Access
|Jun 2024

References

  1. Cicciù M, Fiorillo L, D'Amico C et al. 3D digital impression systems compared with traditional techniques in dentistry: a recent data systematic review. Materials. 2020; 13(8): 1982.
  2. Karakas-Stupar I, Zitzmann N, Joda T. A novel reference model for dental scanning system evaluation: analysis of five intraoral scanners. The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics. 2022; 14(2): 63-69.
  3. Kravitz ND, Groth C, Jones PE et al. Intraoral digital scanners, Journal of clinical orthodontics. 2014; 48(6):337-347.
  4. Mangano F, Gandolfi A, Luongo G et al. Intraoral scanners in dentistry: a review of the current literature. BMC oral health. 2017; 17(1):1-11.
  5. What is an Intraoral Scanner and How Does it Work? https://www.launcadental.com/what-is-an-intraoral-scanner-and-how-does-it-work (accessed 13 November 2022)
  6. Richert R, Goujat A, Venet L et al. Intraoral scanner technologies: a review to make a successful impression. Journal of healthcare engineering. 2017; Artide ID 8427595.
  7. DIGITAL IMPRESSIONS: VIRTUALLY PERFECT http://www.thedentalarcade.com/blog/digital-impressions-virtually-perfect/ (accessed 20 December 2022)
  8. Gogushev K, Abadjiev M, Valcheva Z. Comparison conventional and digital impression technique in prosthetic dentistry: a literature review. Varna medical forum. 2021; 10(1):162-168. (in Bulgarian).
  9. Punj A, Bompolaki D, Garaicoa, J. Dental impression materials and techniques. Dental Clinics. 2017; 61(4)779-796.
  10. Kulkarni M, Thombare R. Dimensionai changes of alginate dental impression materials-An in vitro study. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR. 2015; 9(8):ZC98.
  11. Aragón M, Pontes L, Bichara L et al. Validity and reliability of intraoral scanners compared to conventional gypsum models measurements: a systematic review. European journal of orthodontics. 2016; 38(4):429-434.
  12. Eto N, Yamazoe J, Tsuji A et al. Development of an artificial intelligence-based algorithm to classify images acquired with an intraoral scanner of individual molar teeth into three categories. Plos one. 2022; 17(1):e0261870.
  13. Priyanka G, Sujesh M, Kumar R et al. Digital impressions in prosthodontics – Past, present and future trends. IP Ann. Prost Rest Dent. 2022; 6:66-70.
  14. Swapna B, Kamath V. Digital Impressions In Prosthodontics – An Overview. Journal of Critical Reviews. 2020; 7(14):733-735.
  15. Intraoral scanners: Brand comparison, uses, and more https://www.meetdandy.com/articles/intraoral-scanner-comparison-pros-and-cons/ (accessed 20 November 2022)
  16. Patzelt S, Lamprinos C, Stampf S et al. The time efficiency of intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparative study. J Ame Dental Assoc. 2014; 145(6): 542-551.
  17. Jorquera G, Sampaio C, Bozzalla A et al. Evaluation of trueness and precision of two intraoral scanners and a conventional impression: an in vivo clinical study. Quintessence Int. 2021;52(10), 904-910.
  18. Róth I, Czigola A, Joós-Kovàcs G et al. Leaming curve of digital intraoral scanning-an in vivo study. BMC oral health. 2020; 20(1), 1-7.
  19. Yang C, Cheng C, Ye S et al. A double blinded trial to compare the patient satisfaction and crown accuracy of two different intraoral scanners for the fabrication of monolithic lithium disilicate single crowns. Journal of Dental Sciences. 2022; In Press.
  20. The benefits of digital dental impressions https://blog.ddslab.com/the-benefits-of-digital-dental-impressions (accessed 27 November 2022)
  21. Gavounelis N, Gogola C, Halazonetis D. The Effect of Scanning Strategy on Intraoral Scanner's Accuracy. Dentistry Journal 2022; 10(7): 123-133.
  22. Manicone P, De Angelis P, Rella E et al. Patient preference and clinical working time between digital scanning and conventional impression making for implant-supported prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2022; 128(4):589-596.
  23. Kernen F, Schlager S, Alvarez V et al. Accuracy of intraoral scans: An in vivo study of different scanning devices. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2022; 128(6):1303-1309.
  24. Suese K. Progress in digital dentistry: The practical use of intraoral scanners. Dental Materials Journal. 2020; 39(1):52-56.
  25. Tomita Y, Uechi J, Konno M et al. Accuracy of digital models generated by conventional impression/plaster-model methods and intraoral scanning. Dental materials journal. 2018; 37(4):628-633.
  26. Ali A. Accuracy of digital impressions achieved from five different digital impression Systems. Dentistry. 2015; 5(5): 1.
  27. Vàg J, Renne W, Revell G et al. The effect of software updates on the trueness and precision of intraoral scanners. Quintessence Int. 2021 ; 52(7):636-44.
  28. Sanda M, Miyoshi K, Baba K. Trueness and precision of digital implant impressions by intraoral scanners: a literature review. International Journal of Implant Dentistry. 2021; 7:1-25.
  29. Revilla-León M, Young K, Sicilia E et al. Influence of definitive and interim restorative materials and surface finishing on the scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner. Journal of Dentistry. 2022; 120:104-114.
  30. Alikhasi M, Alsharbaty M, Moharrami M. Digital implant impression technique accuracy: a systematic review. Implant dentistry. 2017; 26(6):929-935.
  31. Arcuri L, Lorenzi C, Cecchetti F, et al. Full digital workflow for implant-prosthetic rehabilitations: a case report. ORAL & implantology. 2015; 8(4):114.
  32. Mizumoto R, Yilmaz B, McGlumphy Jr et al. Accuracy of different digital scanning techniques and scan bodies for complete arch implant-supported prostheses. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2020; 123(1): 96-104.
  33. Amornvit P, Rokaya D, Sanohkan S. Comparison of accuracy of current ten intraoral scanners. BioMed Research International. 2021; Article ID 2673040:10 pages.
  34. Dalai A, Rathi S, Dhamande M. Digital Impressions in Dentistry. Journal of research of medical and dental science. 2022; 10(7):76-81.
  35. Intraoral Scanner Reviews from IDS 2021 + IOS Market Update https://instituteofdigitaldentistry.com/news/intraoral-scanner-reviews-from-ids-2021-ios-market-update/ (accessed 1 November 2022)
  36. Gutmacher Z., Kelly A., Renne W., et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of multiple digital impression systems on a fully edentulous maxilla. Quintessence Int. 2021 ; 52(6):488-495.
  37. Hack G, Patzelt S. Evaluation of the accuracy of six intraoral scanning devices: an in-vitro investigation. ADA Prof Prod Rev.2015; 10(4):1-5.
  38. https://www.3shape.com/ (accessed 13 December 2022)
  39. https://www.dentsplysirona.com/en-us (accessed 1 December 2022)
  40. https://academy.medit.com/courses/meditlink-regular-users-en (accessed 27 December 2022)
  41. https://itero.com/ (accessed 30 November 2022)
  42. https://www.launcadental.com/ (accessed 16 November 2022)
  43. Pavlova V, Pavlov B, Vlahova A et al. Aesthetic prosthetic rehabilitation by digital smile design. Science and Youth Text-book. 2021;6:290-294.
  44. Damyanova D. Scanner SkyScan Microtomography With Temporary Teeth. Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences. 2017; 16,7(VI):92-95.
  45. Rangelov S. Contemporary requirements to fixed interim prosthetic constructions. Problems of dental medicine. 2021; 47(1):13-19.
  46. Hristozova M, Zlatev S, Vlahova A. A fully digital approach in aesthetic rehabilitation, Case report, Oral presentation. Science and Youth Conference MU-Plovdiv. 2021.
  47. Gerdzhikov I. Basic principles and stages of treatment of patients with maxillary resection. Knowledge international journal, scientific papers, medical sciences and health. 2017; 26(4):1301-1306.
  48. Gerdzhikov I. Combined prosthetic treatment options for patients with hard palate resection. Knowledge international journal, scientific papers, medical sciences and health. 2017; 26(4): 1327-1330.
  49. Shindjalova R, Prodanova K, Svechtarov V. Modeling Data for Tilted Implants in Grafted with Bio-Oss Maxillary Sinuses Using Logistic Regression. – AIP Conference Proceedings. 2014; 1631:58-62.
  50. Vlahova A. Preparation junctions for all-ceramic CAD/CAM crown and bridge restorations. Balkan Journal of Dental Medicine. 2016; 20(2):122-125.
  51. Rangelov S. Additive digital technologies in contemporary dental medicine, A review, International Interdisciplinary Virtual Meeting “Alumni Club and Friends”. Book of Proceedings. 2021:140-143.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amb-2024-0021 | Journal eISSN: 2719-5384 | Journal ISSN: 0324-1750
Language: English
Page range: 58 - 64
Submitted on: Jul 3, 2023
Accepted on: Jul 10, 2023
Published on: Jun 23, 2024
Published by: Sofia Medical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2024 M. Dimova-Gabrovska, M. Stamenova, D. Shopova, M. Yankova, published by Sofia Medical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.