Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Linguistic Validation, Adaptation, and Reliability of the Liverpool Elbow Score’s Patient-Answered Questionnaire in Bulgarian the Bulgarian Les-Paq Questionnaire Cover

Linguistic Validation, Adaptation, and Reliability of the Liverpool Elbow Score’s Patient-Answered Questionnaire in Bulgarian the Bulgarian Les-Paq Questionnaire

By: Ts. Tsenkov,  S. Slavchev and  N. Dimitrov  
Open Access
|Dec 2023

References

  1. Powers JH, Patrick DL, Walton MK, et al. Clinician-Reported Outcome Assessments of Treatment Benefit: Report of the ISPOR Clinical Outcome Assessment Emerging Good Practices Task Force. Value Heal. 2017 Jan;20(1):2–14.
  2. Longo UG, Franceschi F, Loppini M, et al. Rating systems for evaluation of the elbow. Br Med Bull. 2008;87(1):131–61.
  3. Laratta J, Caldwell JM, Lombardi J, et al. Evaluation of common elbow pathologies: a focus on physical examination. Phys Sportsmed. 2017;45(2):184–90.
  4. Sathyamoorthy P, Kemp GJ, Rawal A, et al. Development and validation of an elbow score. Rheumatology. 2004;43(11):1434–40.
  5. The B, Reininga IHF, El Moumni M, Eygendaal D. Elbow-specific clinical rating systems: Extent of established validity, reliability, and responsiveness. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2013;22(10):1380–94.
  6. Jacobson-Petrov J, Simeonov L. The Cross-cultural Adaptation of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Into Bulgarian. Hand. 2016;11:146–146.
  7. Suk M, Hanson BP, Norvell DC, Helfet DL. Musculoskeletal Outcomes Measures and Instruments. 2nd ed. Thieme; 2009.
  8. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(24):3186–91.
  9. Lim CR, Harris K, Dawson J, et al. Floor and ceiling effects in the OHS: an analysis of the NHS PROMs data set. BMJ Open. 2015 Jul 27;5(7):e007765.
  10. Koo TK, Li MY. A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155–63.
  11. Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;60(1):34–42.
  12. Zaiontz C. Real Statistics Using Excel [Internet]. 2021. Available from: https://www.real-statistics.com/
  13. Vishwanathan K, Alizadehkhaiyat O, Kemp GJ, Frostick SP. Minimal clinically important difference of Liverpool Elbow Score in elbow arthroplasty. JSES Open Access. 2017 Oct;1(3):144–8.
  14. Şavkın R, Büker N, Şimşek Ş. The Liverpool Elbow Score, patient-answered section: Cultural adaptation, validity and reliability of Turkish version. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2020;50:102256.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amb-2023-0040 | Journal eISSN: 2719-5384 | Journal ISSN: 0324-1750
Language: English
Page range: 33 - 36
Submitted on: Mar 8, 2023
Accepted on: Jun 16, 2023
Published on: Dec 15, 2023
Published by: Sofia Medical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2023 Ts. Tsenkov, S. Slavchev, N. Dimitrov, published by Sofia Medical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.