Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Pilot Study of the Prevalence of Contact Sensitization to Preservatives as Cosmetic Ingredients in Occupational and Educational Exposures Cover

Pilot Study of the Prevalence of Contact Sensitization to Preservatives as Cosmetic Ingredients in Occupational and Educational Exposures

Acta Medica Bulgarica
Volume 50 (2023): Issue 3 (September 2023)
By: M. Lyapina,  K. Lyubomirova,  T. Kundurzhiev and  M. Vizeva  
Open Access
|Sep 2023

References

  1. Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on cosmetic products.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. https://www.fda.gov/cosmetics/cosmetics-laws-regulations/cosmetics-us-law
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Goossens A. Cosmetic Contact Allergens. Cosmetics, 2016, 3(1):5.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Kanokrungsee S, Chaweekulrat P, Chaiyabutr C, et al. A 30-year Patch Testing Experience at Siriraj Dermatology. Siriraj Med J, 2023, 75(2):62-9.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Uter W, Werfel T, White IR, et al. Contact Allergy: A Review of Current Problems from a Clinical Perspective. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2018, 15(6):1108.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Jovanović M. Contact Sensitivity and Allergens in Cosmetic Products. Med Pregl, 2021, 74(5-6):159-66.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Uter W, Wilkinson SM, Aerts O, et al. Patch test results with the European baseline series, 2019/20-Joint European results of the ESSCA and the EBS working groups of the ESCD, and the GEIDAC. Contact Dermatitis, 2022, 87(4):343-355.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Pontén A, Bruze M. Formaldehyde. Dermatitis, 2015, 26(1):3-6.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Bergh M, Magnusson K, Nilsson JL, et al. Formation of formaldehyde and peroxides by air oxidation of high purity polyoxyethylene surfactants. Contact Dermatitis, 1998, 39(1):14-20.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/83. Amending annexes II, III and V to regulation (EC) no 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the council on cosmetic products. OffJ Eur Union, 2019, 23(5):30-31.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Goossens A, Aerts O. Contact allergy to and allergic contact dermatitis from formaldehyde and formaldehyde releasers: A clinical review and update. Contact Dermatitis, 2022, 87(1):20-27.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Sanz-Sánchez T, Mercader García P, Silvestre Salvador JF, et al. Patch testing with formaldehyde 2% aq. – a multicenter study in Spain. Contact Dermatitis, 2019, 81(6):458-59.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Bizjak M, Adamič K, Bajrovič N, et al. Patch testing with the European baseline series and 10 added allergens: Single-centre study of 748 patients. Contact Dermatitis, 2022, 87(5):439-46.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Atwater AR, Petty AJ, Liu B, et al. Contact dermatitis associated with preservatives: retrospective analysis of North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 1994 through 2016. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2021, 84(4):965-976.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Aerts O, Goossens A. Contact Allergy to Preservatives. In: Contact Dermatitis. Johansen JD, Mahler V, Lepoittevin J, et al. (Ed.). Springer, Cha, 2021, 835-76.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. https://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases/cosing/pdf/COSING_Annex%20V_v2.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Amsler E, Aerts O, Raison-Peyron N, et al. Airborne allergic contact dermatitis caused by isothiazolinones in water-based paints: A retrospective study of 44 cases. Contact Dermatitis, 2017, 77(3):163-70.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Aerts O, Goossens A, Lambert J, et al. Contact allergy caused by isothiazolinone derivatives: an overview of non-cosmetic and unusual cosmetic sources. Eur J Dermatol, 2017, 27(2):115-22.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Mercader-García P, Pastor-Nieto MA, Gonzalez-Perez R, et al. Should methyldibromo glutaronitrile continue to be used in the European baseline Series? A REIDAC national cross-sectional study. Contact Dermatitis, 2021, 85:572-77.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Warshaw EM, Buonomo M, DeKoven JG, et al. Patch testing to Methyldibromoglutaronitrile/Phenoxyethanol: North American Contact Dermatitis Group experience, 1994–2018. Dermatitis, 2021, 32(4):256-66.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Luis-Gronau C, Cruzval-O’Reilly E, Lugo-Somolinos A. Methyldibromo-glutaronitrile: Increased incidence, but lacks clinical relevance. Dermatitis, 2021, 32(6):e135-e36.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Andernord D, Bruze M, Bryngelsson IL, et al. Contact allergy to haptens in the Swedish baseline series: Results from the Swedish Patch Test Register (2010 to 2017). Contact Dermatitis, 2022, 86(3):175-88.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Vanhoutte C, Goossens A, Gilissen L, et al. Concomitant contact-allergic reactions to iodopropynyl butylcarbamate and iodine. Contact Dermatitis, 2019, 81(1):17-23.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Giménez-Arnau AM, Deza G, Bauer A, et al. Contact allergy to preservatives: ESSCA* results with the baseline series, 2009-2012. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 2017, 31(4): 664-71.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. Johnson WJr, Boyer I, Zhu J, et al. Safety assessment of polyaminopropyl biguanide (Polyhexamethylene Biguanide Hydrochloride) as used in cosmetics. Int J Toxicol, 2020, 39(3_suppl):26S-73S.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. Sukakul T, Dahlin J, Pontén A, et al. Contact allergy to polyhexamethylene biguanide (polyaminopropyl biguanide). Contact Dermatitis, 2021, 84:326–31.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety. Opinion on Polyaminopropyl Biguanide (PHMB) – Submission III. In: Commission E, ed. SCCS/1581/16. Luxembourg, 2017 https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/scientific_committees/ consumer_safety/docs/sccs_o_204.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. Goh CF, Ming LC, Wong LC. Dermatologic reactions to disinfectant use during the COVID-19 pandemic. Clin Dermatol, 2021, 39(2):314-22.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. Rembe JD, Fromm-Dornieden C, Schafer N, et al. Comparing two polymeric biguanides: chemical distinction, antiseptic efficacy and cytotoxicity of polyaminopropyl biguanide and polyhexamethylene biguanide. J Med Microbiol, 2016, 65(8):867-76.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02009R1223-20200501&from=EN
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. Pastor-Nieto MA, Gonzalez-Munoz P, Perez-Mesonero R, et al. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by poly(hexamethylene) biguanide hydrochloride in contact lens care solutions. Contact Dermatitis, 2017, 76(6):357-81.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. Leysen J, Goossens A, Lambert J, et al. Polyhexamethylene biguanide is a relevant sensitizer in wet wipes. Contact Dermatitis, 2014, 70(5):316-28.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. Jaque A, DeKoven J. Polyhexamethylene biguanide and alkyl glucosides: unexpected allergens in an antimicrobial foam dressing. Contact Dermatitis, 2017, 77(1):421-22.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. Pummi K, Kemppi E, Lammintausta K. Occupational sensitization to polyhexamethylene guanidine hydrochloride in a non-alcoholic hand rub. Contact Dermatitis, 2012, 66:348-349.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. Kolodziej M, Kiewert A, Skudlik C, Brans R. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by polyhexamethylene biguanide may contribute to work-related hand eczema. Contact Dermatitis, 2021, 85:97–98.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. Reeder M, Atwater AR. Parabens: The 2019 Nonallergen of the Year. Cutis, 2019, 103(04):192-93.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. Giácaman-von der Weth MM, Ferrer-Guillén B, María Ortiz-Salvador J, et al. Is time to remove parabens from standard patch test batteries? Retrospective study of 10 461 patients. Allergy, 2020, 75(11):2997-99.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amb-2023-0027 | Journal eISSN: 2719-5384 | Journal ISSN: 0324-1750
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 29 - 35
Submitted on: Apr 10, 2023
Accepted on: May 17, 2023
Published on: Sep 29, 2023
Published by: Sofia Medical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
contact sensitization,
preservatives,
cosmetics,
occupational exposure,
educational exposure
Related subjects:
Medicine,
Basic medical science,
Immunology,
Clinical medicine,
Clinical medicine, other

© 2023 M. Lyapina, K. Lyubomirova, T. Kundurzhiev, M. Vizeva, published by Sofia Medical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 50 (2023): Issue 3 (September 2023)Next article