Er:Yag Laser Root Modification for Single Root Recession Class III Coverage – Case Report

Yaneva, B.

doi:10.2478/amb-2021-0033

Abstract

Gingival recession is a common dental condition causing esthetic and functional problems to the patients. In the present case report gingival recession Miller class III is treated with bilaminar technique and subepithelial connective tissue graft where the tooth root surface is modified by Er:YAG laser and the case is observed for 5 months. There were no complications or side effects during the surgery and the healing period. The patient was stable after 5 months of follow-up. It could be concluded that the Er:YAG laser could be used in addition to mucogingival surgery, but longer observation and more studies are needed to clarify and prove its adjunctive application.

References

1. Borkar P, Gattani D, Uike S. Gingival Recession–An Overview. J Dent Forecast. 2019; 2 (2):1021.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
2. Zucchelli G, Mounssif I, Stefanini M et al. Hand and ultrasonic instrumentation in combination with root-coverage surgery: A comparative controlled randomized clinical trial. Journal of periodontology,2009; 80(4): 577-585.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
3. Sharma K, Chaubey KK, Sharma S et al. Current status of root biomodification agents in regeneration. University J Dent Scie, 2015; 1(1), 13-20.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
4. İzol BS, Üner DD, İpek F, Arpağ OF. Evaluation of the effect of EDTA on root coverage at free gingival graft procedure. International Dental Research, 2018; 8(1): 28-34.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
5. Lavu V, Sundaram S, Sabarish R, Rao SR. Root Surface Biomodification with Erbium Lasers – A Myth or a Reality? Open Dent J. 2015;9:79-86.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
6. Yaneva B, Firkova E, Karaslavova E, Romanos GE. Bactericidal effects of using a fiber-less Er: YAG laser system for treatment of moderate chronic periodontitis: Preliminary results. Quintessence Int, 2014; 45(6): 489-497.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
7. Yaneva B, Firkova E, Karaslavova E. Early clinical effectiveness of Er: Yag laser in association with the red complex of bacteria in the initial treatment of moderate chronic periodontitis. Acta Medica Bulgarica, 2014; 41(1):37-44.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
8. Caton J, Armitage G, Berglundh, T et al. A new classification scheme for periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions – Introduction and key changes from the 1999 classification. J ClinPeriodontol. 2018; 45(Suppl 20): S1-S8.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
9. Miller PD Jr. A classification of marginal tissue recession. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1985;5(2):8-13.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
10. Cairo F, Nieri M, Cincinelli S et al. The interproximal clinical attachment level to classify gingival recessions and predict root coverage outcomes: An explorative and reliability study. J Clin Periodontol, 2011;38:661-6.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
11. Zucchelli G, Mele M, Stefanini M, et al. Predetermination of root coverage. J Periodontol. 2010;81(7):1019-1026.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
12. Zucchelli G. Mucogingival esthetic surgery. Milan, Italy, Quintessenza Edizioni S.r.l., 2013, 462-466.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
13. Cairo F, Rotundo R, Miller PD, Pini Prato GP. Root coverage esthetic score: a system to evaluate the esthetic outcome of the treatment of gingival recession through evaluation of clinical cases. J Periodontol. 2009;80(4):705-710.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
14. American Academy of Periodontology. Consensus report. Mucogingival therapy. Ann Periodontol 1996; 1:702-706.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
15. Raetzke PB. Covering localized areas of root exposure employing the “envelope” technique. J Periodontol 1985;56:397-402.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
16. Zucchelli G, Amore C, Sforza NM et al. Bilaminar techniques for the treatment of recession-type defects. A comparative clinical study. J ClinPeriodontol 2003;30:862-870.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
17. Tatakis DN, Trombelli L. Gingival recession treatment: guided tissue regeneration with bioabsorbable membrane versus connective tissue graft. Journal of Periodontology, 2000;71(2): 299-307.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
18. Aichelmann-Reidy ME, Yukna RA, Evans GH et al. Clinical evaluation of acellular allograft dermis for the treatment of human gingival recession. Journal of periodontology,2001; 72(8): 998-1005.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
19. Shreehari AK, Darekar HS, Borthakur R. A comparative analysis of root surface biomodification with ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid and tetracycline hydrochloride: An in vitro scanning electron microscopic study. Med J Armed Forces India. 2016;72(2):145–151.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
20. Shewale A, Gattani D, Mahajan R et al. Root Surface Biomodification: Current Status and a Literature Review on Available Agents for Periodontal Regeneration. British Journal of Medicine and Medical Research, 2016; 13: 1-14.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Er:Yag Laser Root Modification for Single Root Recession Class III Coverage – Case Report

Abstract

Paradigm

My account