Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Role of the Patient‘s Viewpoint in Health Technologies Assessment in Bulgaria Cover

Role of the Patient‘s Viewpoint in Health Technologies Assessment in Bulgaria

By: C. Georgieva and  A. Yanakieva  
Open Access
|Oct 2021

References

  1. 1. Abelson J, Bombard Y, Gauvin FP, Simeonov D, Boesveld S. Assessing the impacts of citizen deliberations on the health technology process. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013;29:282-289.
  2. 2. British Medical Association. Patient and public involvement – A toolkit for doctors. London: BMA; 2011.
  3. 3. Dimitrova Z, Getov I. Fundamentals of pharmacy practice and business. 2009; Sofia: ed. University press “Sv. Kliment Ohridski”.
  4. 4. Facey K, Boivin A, Gracia J, et al. Patients’ perspectives in health technology assessment: A route to robust evidence and fair deliberation. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2010;26:334-340.
  5. 5. Hansen HP, Lee A, Van Randwijk CB. Patient aspects: A review of fifty-eight Danish HTA reports. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27:330-336.
  6. 6. Health Equality Europe. Understanding health technology assessment (HTA). Health Equality Europe; 2008.
  7. 7. Health Technology Assessment International. HTAi strategic plan 2009 – 2013 (section on background and environment). Canada: HTAi; 2009 www.htai.org/fileadmin/HTAi_Files/StrategicPlan2009To2013Materials/HTAi2009To2013StrategicPlan.pdf (accessed March 27, 2019). Health Technology Assessment International. HTAi strategic plan 2009 – 2013 (section on background and environment). Canada: HTAi; 2009 www.htai.org/fileadmin/HTAi_Files/StrategicPlan2009To-2013Materials/HTAi2009To2013StrategicPlan.pdf (accessed March 28, 2019).
  8. 8. https://www.cadth.ca (accessed March 27, 2019).
  9. 9. International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment. HTA resources – definition of technology assessment. Sweden: INAHTA. www.inahta.org/HTA/ (accessed April 4, 2019).
  10. 10. Kreis J, Schmidt H. Public engagement in health technology assessment and coverage decisions: A study of experiences in France, Germany, and the United Kingdom. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2013;38:89-122.
  11. 11. Menon D, Stafinski T. Role of patient and public participation in health technology assessment and coverage decisions. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2011;11:75-89.
  12. 12. Ozieranski P, McKee M, King L. The politics of health technology assessment in Poland. Health Policy (New York). 2012; 108 (2–3):178-193. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol. 2012. 10.001.
  13. 13. Pivik J, Rode E, Ward C. A consumer involvement model for health technology assessment in Canada. Health Policy. 2004;69:253-68.
  14. 14. Tjornhoj-Thomsen T, Hansen HP. Knowledge in health technology assessment: Who, what, how? Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27:324-329.
  15. 15. Whitty JA. An International Survey of the Public Engagement Pract ices of Health Technology Assessment Organizations. Value Health. 2013;16:155-163.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amb-2021-0028 | Journal eISSN: 2719-5384 | Journal ISSN: 0324-1750
Language: English
Page range: 5 - 11
Submitted on: Aug 31, 2020
Accepted on: Sep 22, 2020
Published on: Oct 22, 2021
Published by: Sofia Medical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2021 C. Georgieva, A. Yanakieva, published by Sofia Medical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.