Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Comparison of Outcome of Bone Autograft and Allograft in Union of Long Bone Fractures Cover

Comparison of Outcome of Bone Autograft and Allograft in Union of Long Bone Fractures

Open Access
|Aug 2021

References

  1. 1. Sadighi A, Sabetian A, Soltanmohammadlo F. A Comparison between Allograft and Autograft methods on the Rate of Union in Comminuted Fracture of Long Bones. Medical Journal of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences and Health Services. 2015;37(1):34-9.
  2. 2. Boer C dP, Patka F, Bakker H, Haarman M. Current Concepts of Fracture Healing, Delayed Unions, and Nonunions. Osteo Trauma Care 2002;10(1):1-7.10.1055/s-2002-30627
  3. 3. Tay BK, Patel VV, Bradford DS. Calcium sulfate- and calcium phosphate-based bone substitutes. Mimicry of the mineral phase of bone. Orthop Clin North Am. 1999;30(4):615-2310.1016/S0030-5898(05)70114-0
  4. 4. Kainer MA, Linden JV, Whaley DN et al. Clostridium infections associated with musculoskeletal-tissue allografts. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(25):2564-71.10.1056/NEJMoa02322215201413
  5. 5. Dorea HC, McLaughlin RM, Cantwell HD et al. Evaluation of healing in feline femoral defects filled with cancellous autograft, cancellous allograft or Bioglass. Veterinary and comparative orthopaedics and traumatology: VCOT. 2005;18(3):157-68.10.1055/s-0038-1632947
  6. 6. Udupa KN, Prasad GC. Chemical and Histochemical Studies on the Organic Constituents in Fracture Repair in Rats. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1963;45(4):770-9.
  7. 7. Laurencin C, Khan Y, El-Amin SF. Bone graft substitutes. Expert review of medical devices. 2006;3(1):49-57.10.1586/17434440.3.1.4916359252
  8. 8. Nandi SK, Roy S, Mukherjee P et al. Orthopaedic applications of bone graft & graft substitutes: a review. Indian J Med Res. 2010;132:15-30.
  9. 9. Babaei S, Changizy Ashtiani S. Comparative Assessment of the Healing process of Two Kinds of Endochondral Bone Allografts with each other and with Intramembranous Allografts Assisted by Double Deantigenization. RJMS. 2007;14(55):35-45.
  10. 10. Işik M, Özdemir HM, Sakaoğullari A et al. The efficacy of in situ local autograft in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery: a comparison of three different grafting methods. Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2017;47(6):1728-35.10.3906/sag-1703-16629306231
  11. 11. Tian P, Hu W-q, Li Z-j et al. Comparison of autograft and allograft tendons in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A meta-analysis. Medicine. 2017;96(27).10.1097/MD.0000000000007434550218128682908
  12. 12. Vining NC, Warme WJ, Mosca VS. Comparison of structural bone autografts and allografts in pediatric foot surgery. J Pediatr Orthop. 2012;32(7):714-8.10.1097/BPO.0b013e31824b6c8222955536
  13. 13. McNeilan RJ, Everhart JS, Mescher PK et al. Graft Choice in Isolated Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis of Rates of Recurrent Instability and Patient-Reported Outcomes for Autograft, Allograft, and Synthetic Options. Arthroscopy. 2017.10.1016/j.arthro.2017.11.02729366741
  14. 14. Muscolo DL, Ayerza MA, Tinao LAA, Ranalletta M. Distal femur osteoarticular allograft reconstruction after grade III open fractures in pediatric patients. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18(5):312-5.10.1097/00005131-200405000-0000915105755
  15. 15. Peyvandi M, Eshraghi R. Two case reports of widespread use of allografts in the treatment of open fractures of the femur. Journal of Medical Council of Islamic Republic of Iran. 2008;26(2):265-8.
  16. 16. Samartzis D, Shen FH, Matthews DK et al. Comparison of allograft to autograft in multilevelanterior cervical discectomy and fusion with rigid plate fixation. The Spine Journal. 2003;3(6):451-9.10.1016/S1529-9430(03)00173-6
  17. 17. Grier KM, Walling AK. The use of tricortical autograft versus allograft in lateral column lengthening for adult acquired flatfoot deformity: an analysis of union rates and complications. Foot Ankle Int. 2010;31(9):760-9.10.3113/FAI.2010.0760
  18. 18. Xu W, Yang S, Li B et al. [Allogeneic cortical bone cage support combining with autologous cancellous bone grafting for managing femoral head necrosis]. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2009;23(5):527-9. [Article in Chinese]
  19. 19. Kong Z, Tian D, Yu H et al. [Treatment of traumatic bone defect with graft material of allogenic cancellous combined with autologous red marrow]. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2008 Oct;22(10):1251-4. [Article in Chines].
  20. 20. Rhodes J, Mansour A, Frickman A et al. Comparison of Allograft and Bovine Xenograft in Calcaneal Lengthening Osteotomy for Flatfoot Deformity in Cerebral Palsy. J Pediatr. Orthop. 2017;37(3):e202-e8.10.1097/BPO.0000000000000822
  21. 21. Hudgens JL, Gillette BP, Krych AJ et al. Allograft versus autograft in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an evidence-based systematic review. J Knee Surg. 2013;26(02):109-16.10.1055/s-0032-1319778
  22. 22. Moore WR, Graves SE, Bain GI. Synthetic bone graft substitutes. ANZ J Surg. 2001;71(6):354-61.10.1046/j.1440-1622.2001.02128.x
  23. 23. Behairy Y Jasty M. Bone grafts and bone substitutes in hip and knee surgery. Orthopedic Clinics. 1999;30(4):661-71.10.1016/S0030-5898(05)70118-8
  24. 24. Greenwald AS, Boden SD, Goldberg VM et al. Bone-graft substitutes: facts, fictions, and applications. JBJS. 2001;83:98–103.10.2106/00004623-200100022-0000711712842
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amb-2021-0017 | Journal eISSN: 2719-5384 | Journal ISSN: 0324-1750
Language: English
Page range: 13 - 18
Submitted on: Aug 5, 2020
Accepted on: Sep 22, 2020
Published on: Aug 11, 2021
Published by: Sofia Medical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2021 H. Valiyollahpoor-Amiri, S. M. Esmaeilnejad-Ganji, R. Jokar, B. Baghianimoghadam, S. Kamali-Ahangar, M. Bahrami-Feridoni, published by Sofia Medical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.