Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Fundamental Significance of The Social and Ethical Criteria for Primary Care Quality Assessment Cover

The Fundamental Significance of The Social and Ethical Criteria for Primary Care Quality Assessment

Open Access
|May 2020

References

  1. 1. Borisova B. Evaluation of GP Activity through Patient Opinion. PhD Thesis, 2013, p. 162.
  2. 2. Valentinova Ts., Goranov M. The General Practitioners and the Evaluation of their Patients. General Practice, vol. V, 2, 2003, 3-5.
  3. 3. Vodenicharov Ts, Popova S, Medical Ethics, publ. house Eko-Print, Sofia, 2010.
  4. 4. Gardeva, M. Ethical problems in the assessment of health services needs and their prioritization. – Medical Meridians, 2013,3.
  5. 5. Zlatanova, T., R. Zlatanova-Velikova. Assessment of the Communication Skills of the GP. Jour. Medical Meridians, 2012, 1-2, 48-52.
  6. 6. Vasileva, B. Patient Satisfaction with GPs as a Social and Ethical Criterion for the Health Care Quality in the Pleven Region. PhD Thesis, 2019, 151.
  7. 7. Shtereva-Nikolova N. Communication and the Right to Information as a Major Component of Informed Consent. Social Medicine, 2015, 1.2: 29-31.
  8. 8. Beauchamp T, Childress J. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford university press, 2013.
  9. 9. Marshall М, Mannion R, Nelson E, Davies H.Managing change in the culture of general practice: qualitative case studies in primary care trusts. – BMJ, 2003; 327:599.10.1136/bmj.327.7415.59919409112969929
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amb-2020-0013 | Journal eISSN: 2719-5384 | Journal ISSN: 0324-1750
Language: English
Page range: 73 - 75
Submitted on: Oct 1, 2019
|
Accepted on: Oct 1, 2019
|
Published on: May 21, 2020
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2020 B. Vasileva, Al. Vodenicharova, published by Medical University - Sofia
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.