Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Methods for Ultrasound Screening of Cardiovascular Diseases in Type 2 Diabetic Patients Cover

Methods for Ultrasound Screening of Cardiovascular Diseases in Type 2 Diabetic Patients

Open Access
|Mar 2018

References

  1. 1. WH Organization. Diabetes. Fact Sheet N312 2014. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs312/en/%5D. Accessed Nov 2014.
  2. 2. World Health Organization (WHO) Consultation. Definition and diagnosis of diabetes and intermediate hyperglycaemia. 2006, http://www.who.int/diabetes/publications/Definition%20and%20diagnosis%20of%20diabetes_new.pdf
  3. 3. The DECODE Study Group. Is the current definition for diabetes relevant to mortality risk from all causes and cardiovascular and noncardiovascular diseases? Diabetes Care 2003;26:688-696.10.2337/diacare.26.3.688
  4. 4. Norhammar A, Tenerz Å, Nilsson G, et al . Glucose metabolism in patients with acute myocardial infarction and no previous diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. A prospective study. Lancet 2002; 359: 2140-2144.10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09089-X
  5. 5. Lang R, Biering M, Devereux RB et al. Recommendations for Chamber Quantification: A Report from the American Society of Echocardiography’s Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, Developed in Conjuction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a Branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005; 18(12): 1440-1463.10.1016/j.echo.2005.10.00516376782
  6. 6. Popescu BA, Carmen CB, Carmen G. Echocardiographic ssessment of diastolic heart failure. European Cardiology 2010, 6(3): 13-17.10.15420/ecr.2010.6.3.13
  7. 7. Liu JH, Chen Y, Yuen M et al. Incremental prognostic value of global longitudinal strain in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2016;15:22. doi: 10.1186/s12933-016-0333-5.
  8. 8. Mitrovska S, Lazeska B. Contemporary Echocardiographic Techniques in Early Detection of Diabetic Cardiomyopathy. J Cardiol Curr Res 2014; 1(5): 00025.10.15406/jccr.2014.01.00025
  9. 9. Boyer J, Thanigaraj S, Schechtman KB, Perez JE (2004) Prevalence of ventricular diastolic dysfunction in asymptomatic, normotensive patients with diabetes mellitus. Am J Cardiol 93(7): 870-875.10.1016/j.amjcard.2003.12.02615050491
  10. 10. Zahiti BF, Gorani DR, Gashi FB, et al. Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction in Asymptomatic Type 2 Diabetic Patients: Detection and Evaluation by Tissue Doppler Imaging. Acta Informatica Medica 2013;21(2):120-123.10.5455/aim.2013.21.120-122
  11. 11. Hölscher ME, Bode C, Bugger H. Diabetic Cardiomyopathy: Does the Type of Diabetes Matter? Int J Mol Sci. 2016 Dec 18;17(12) pii: E2136.10.3390/ijms17122136518793627999359
  12. 12. An D., Rodrigues B. Role of changes in cardiac metabolism in development of diabetic cardiomyopathy. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 291 2006:H1489-H1506.10.1152/ajpheart.00278.200616751293
  13. 13. Giacco F, Brownlee M. Oxidative stress and diabetic complications. Circ Res. 2010;107(9):1058-70.10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.223545299692221030723
  14. 14. Bergerot C, Davidsen ES, Amaz C et al. Diastolic function deterioration in type 2 diabetes mellitus: predictive factors over a 3-year follow-up. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Feb 6. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jew331.
  15. 15. Fontes-Carvalho R, Ladeiras-Lopes R, Bettencourt P et al. Diastolic dysfunction in the diabetic continuum: association ith insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2015 Jan 13;14:4. doi: 10.1186/s12933-014-0168-x.
  16. 16. Paneni F, Gregori M, Tocci G et al. Do diabetes, metabolic syndrome or their association equally affect biventricular function? A tissue Doppler study. Hypertens Res. 2013 Jan;36(1):36-42.10.1038/hr.2012.13722951523
  17. 17. Ofstad AP, Urheim S, Dalen H et al. Identification of a definite diabetic cardiomyopathy in type 2 diabetes by comprehensive echocardiographic evaluation: A cross-sectional comparison with non-diabetic weight-matched controls. J Diabetes. 2015 Nov;7(6):779-90.10.1111/1753-0407.1223925350248
  18. 18. De Jong KA, Czeczor JK, Sithara S et al. Obesity and type 2 diabetes have additive effects on left ventricular remodelling in normotensive patients-a cross sectional study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2017 Feb 8;16(1):21.10.1186/s12933-017-0504-z529977628178970
  19. 19. Jørgensen PG, Jensen MT, Mogelvang R et al. Abnormal echocardiography in patients with type 2 diabetes and relation to symptoms and clinical characteristics. Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2016 Sep;13(5):321-30.10.1177/147916411664558327208801
  20. 20. Rossi A, Zoppini G, Benfari G et al. Mitral Regurgitation and Increased Risk of All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. Am J Med. 2017 Jan;130(1):70-76.e1.10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.07.01627555095
  21. 21. Blomstrand P, Engvall M, Festin K et al. Left ventricular diastolic function, assessed by echocardiography and tissue Doppler imaging, is a strong predictor of cardiovascular events, superior to global left ventricular longitudinal strain, in patients with type 2 diabetes. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;16(9):1000-7.10.1093/ehjci/jev02725750201
  22. 22. Naqvi TZ, Lee MS. Carotid intima-media thickness and plaque in cardiovascular risk assessment. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7(10):1025-38.10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.11.01425051948
  23. 23. Niu L, Zhang Y, Qian M et al. Impact of multiple cardiovascular risk factors on carotid intima-media thickness and elasticity. PLoS One. 2013 2;8(7):e67809.10.1371/journal.pone.0067809369947423844099
  24. 24. Baldassarre D, Hamsten A, Veglia F et al. IMPROVE Study Group. Measurements of carotid intima-media thickness and of interadventitia common carotid diameter improve prediction of cardiovascular events: results of the IMPROVE (Carotid Intima Media Thickness [IMT] and IMTProgression as Predictors of Vascular Events in a High Risk European Population) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Oct 16;60(16):1489-99.10.1016/j.jacc.2012.06.03422999719
  25. 25. Plasencia Martínez JM, Garcia Santos JM, Paredes Martinez ML, Pastor AM. Carotid intima-media thickness and hemodynamic parameters: reproducibility of manual measurements with Doppler ultrasound. Med Ultrason. 2015;17(2):167-74.10.11152/mu.2013.2066.172.ci-m26052566
  26. 26. Touboul PJ, Hennerici MG, Meairs S et al. Mannheim carotid intima-media thickness and plaque consensus (2004-2006- 2011). An update on behalf of the advisory board of the 3rd, 4th and 5th watching the risk symposia, at the 13th, 15th and 20th European Stroke Conferences, Mannheim, Germany, 2004, Brussels, Belgium, 2006, and Hamburg, Germany, 2011. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012;34(4):290-6.10.1159/000343145376079123128470
  27. 27. Gállego Pérez-Larraya J, Irimia P, Martínez-Vila E et al. The influence of obesity on the assessment of carotid intima-media thickness. J Clin Ultrasound. 2012 Oct;40(8):479-85.10.1002/jcu.2191622508361
  28. 28. Badeĭnikova KK, Mazaev AP, Toguzova ZA et al. [Detection of early markers of atherosclerosis in men with various levels of risk of cardiovascular complications]. Kardiologiia. 2014;54(6):35-9.10.18565/cardio.2014.6.35-3925178075
  29. 29. Silvestrini M, Altamura C, Cerqua R et al. Ultrasonographic markers of vascular risk in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2013;33(4):619-24.10.1038/jcbfm.2013.5361840123361391
  30. 30. Lubas A, Kade G, Niemczyk S. Renal resistive index as a marker of vascular damage in cardiovascular diseases. Int Urol Nephrol. 2014;46(2):395-402.10.1007/s11255-013-0528-6393217123959401
  31. 31. Kawai T, Kamide K, Onishi M et al. Usefulness of the resistive index in renal Doppler ultrasonography as an indicator of vascular damage in patients with risks of atherosclerosis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011;26(10):3256-62.10.1093/ndt/gfr05421372256
  32. 32. Bruno RM, Daghini E, Landini L, et al. Dynamic evaluation ofrenal resistive index in normoalbuminuric patients with newly diagnosed hypertension or type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2011;54:2430-2439.10.1007/s00125-011-2148-y21499674
  33. 33. Mancini M, Masulli M, Liuzzi R et al. Renal duplex sonographic evaluation of type 2 diabetic patients. J Ultrasound Med. 2013;32(6):1033-40.10.7863/ultra.32.6.103323716525
  34. 34. MacIsaac RJ, Thomas MC, Panagiotopoulos S et al. Association between intrarenal arterial resistance and diastolic dysfunction in type 2 diabetes. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2008 23;7:15. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-7-15.
  35. 35. Kinouchi M, Aihara K, Fujinaka Y et al. Diabetic conditions differentially affect the endothelial function, arterial stiffness and carotid atherosclerosis. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2014;21(5):486-500.10.5551/jat.2083424401746
  36. 36. Staub D, Meyerhans A, Bundi B et al. Prediction of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality: comparison of the internal carotid artery resistive index with the common carotid artery intima-media thickness. Stroke. 2006;37(3):800-5.10.1161/01.STR.0000202589.47401.c616439703
  37. 37. Chung H, Jung YH, Kim KH et al. Carotid Artery End- Diastolic Velocity and Future Cerebro-Cardiovascular Events in Asymptomatic High Risk Patients. Korean Circ J. 2016;46(1):72-8.10.4070/kcj.2016.46.1.72472085226798388
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amb-2018-0010 | Journal eISSN: 2719-5384 | Journal ISSN: 0324-1750
Language: English
Page range: 50 - 54
Published on: Mar 31, 2018
Published by: Sofia Medical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2018 A. Kundurdzhiev, Alexandra Markova, published by Sofia Medical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.