Fig. 1.
Physical 2D model of our study
Fig. 2.
Comparison of the results of the contours of isotherms when Pr = 10 and Et = 1010 between the present study and the study of Mohammad Shahabady et al.
Fig. 3.
Comparison of the results of the streamlines when Pr = 10 and Et = 1010 between the present work and the work of Mohammad Shahabady et al.
Tab. 1.
The average Nusselt number for variety of elements number
| Number of elements | 1112 | 8139 | 12172 | 54685 | 54981 |
| Average Nusselt number | 4,3988 | 4,8061 | 4,8905 | 4,9829 | 4,9829 |
Fig. 4.
Streamlines of the velocity when Et=5×109 and Et=1011 for different Rayleigh numbers
Fig. 5.
Isotherms for Et=5×109 and Et=1011 for different Rayleigh numbers
Fig. 6.
Cutlines for different regions of the cavity
Fig. 7.
Temperature profiles in the region L1 for multiples Rayleigh numbers and Et=5×109, Et=1011
Fig. 8.
Temperature profiles in L2 cutline for variating Rayleigh numbers and Et=5×109, Et=1011
Fig. 9.
Temperature profiles in L3 cutline for different Rayleigh numbers and Et=5×109, Et=1011
Fig. 10.
Temperature profiles in L4 cutline where Et=5×109, 1011 for different Ra
Fig. 11.
Velocity profiles in cutline L1 for different Rayleigh numbers and Et=5×109, Et=1011
Fig. 12.
Velocity profiles in cutline L2 for different Rayleigh numbers and Et=5×109, Et=1011
Fig. 13.
Velocity profiles in cutline L3 for different Rayleigh numbers and Et=5×109, Et=1011
Fig. 14.
Velocity profiles in cutline L4 for different Rayleigh numbers and Et=5×109, Et=1011
Fig. 15.
Variation of the average Nusselt number as a function of Ra for different Et values