Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 7.

Results of response time tr [s] of the braking system of the tested trailer
| No. | Bialystok University of Technology simulator | Industrial simulator |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.282 | 0.282 |
| 2 | 0.281 | 0.280 |
| 3 | 0.280 | 0.281 |
| 4 | 0.281 | 0.280 |
| 5 | 0.280 | 0.280 |
| 6 | 0.279 | 0.280 |
| 7 | 0.280 | 0.280 |
| 8 | 0.279 | 0.280 |
| 9 | 0.279 | 0.281 |
| 10 | 0.282 | 0.281 |
| 11 | 0.280 | 0.281 |
| 12 | 0.279 | 0.280 |
| 13 | 0.280 | 0.281 |
| 14 | 0.280 | 0.282 |
| 15 | 0.281 | 0.280 |
| Mean | 0.2802±0.0008 | 0.2806±0.0006 |
| Test name | Normality/p-value test results | |
| SDA | H0/0.3756 | H0/0.1406 |
| DLM | H0/0.5722/0.8409 | H0/0.0650/0.2546 |
| DH | H0/0.5855 | H0/0.1037 |
| G | H0/0.7342 | H0/0.0648 |
| Result of the test Welch/p-value | H0/0.2278 | |
| Result of the test MWW/p-value | H0/0.2065 | |
| Response time [6] | 0.3 | 0.3 |