Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Effect of Dam–Rock Foundation Interaction Modeling on the Modal Ratio-Related Quantity of Beni Behdel and ‘El Mefrouch Multi-Arch Dams

Open Access
|Jul 2023

References

  1. ANSYS. ANSYS User’s Manual, ANSYS Theory Manual, vol. version 1
  2. Azam MS, Malik AH, Irshad A, Iqbal M, Ahmad I. Elastic Parameter Measurement by Comparison of Modal Analysis Using ANSYS Workbench and Pulsed Laser Impulse Excited Frequency Response of Fully Clamped Thin Square Soda Lime Glass. J Vibration Eng Technol. 2022;1-10.
  3. Berrabah AT, Belharizi M, Laulusa A, Bekkouche A. Three-Dimensional Modal Analysis of Brezina Concrete Arch Dam, Algeria. Earth Sci Res. 2012;1(2):55. DOI: 10.5539/esr.v1n2p55.
  4. Berrabah T. Modal behavior of dam reservoir foundation system. Electron J Geotech Eng. 2011;16.
  5. Chen D, Hou C, Wang F. Influences on the seismic response of the gravity dam-foundation-reservoir system with different boundary and input models. Shock Vibration. 2021. DOI: 10.1155/2021/6660145.
  6. Chopra AK. Earthquake analysis of arch dams: factors to be considered. J Struct Eng. 2012;138(3):205-214.
  7. Clough RW, Raphael JM, Mojtahedi S. ADAP: A computer program for static and dynamic analysis of arch dams. Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California; 1973.
  8. Copen MD, Legas J, Lindholm EA, Tarbox GS, Reed FD. Design of gravity dams. a water resources technical publication. Final report. Denver, CO (United States): Bureau of Reclamation; 1976.
  9. Doronin FL. Stress-Strain State of Intersection Joints of Concrete Dams under Dynamic Impacts. Power Technol Eng. 2021;55(4):549552. DOI: 10.1007/s10749-021-01395-z.
  10. Ferdousi A. Nonlinear seismic response of arch dams considering joint opening effects and boundary conditions of discontinuous foundation. J Numer Methods Civil Eng. 2021;5(3):56-66.
  11. Fok K, Hall JF, Chopra AK. EACD-3D: a computer program for three-dimensional earthquake analysis of concrete dams. Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California Berkeley, CA; 1986.
  12. Fenves GL, R.B.R. S.M. ADAP-88: a computer program for nonlinear earthquake analysis of concrete arch dams. Tech. Rep. Berkeley, CA, USA: Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California at Berkeley; 1989.
  13. Gorai S, Maity D. Seismic Performance Evaluation of Concrete Gravity Dams in Finite-Element Framework. Pract Period Struct Des Constr. 2022;27(1):04021072.
  14. Karabulut M. Earthquake response of roller compacted concrete dams including galleries. Struct Eng Mech. 2019;72(2):141-153.
  15. Maeso O, Domínguez J. Earthquake analysis of arch dams. I: Dam-foundation interaction. J Eng Mech. 1993;119(3):496-512.
  16. Nasreddine K, Amina TB, Youcef H, Mohamed B, Mohamed M, el Amine MM. Soil-fluid-structure interaction applied to the Oued Taht dam (taking into account the membrane effect). MATEC Web of Conferences. 2022;vol. 149:2037.
  17. Rea D, Liaw C, Chopra AK. Mathematical models for the dynamic analysis of concrete gravity dams. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 1974;3(3):249-258.
  18. Tidke AR, Adhikary S, Farsangi EN. On the seismic performance evaluation of dam-foundation-reservoir system for the effect of frequency content and foundation flexibility. Ocean Eng. 2022;247: 110586.
  19. US Army. Corps of engineers, engineering and design-time-history dynamic analysis of concrete hydraulic structures. Tech. Rep. Washington, DC, USA: Department of the Army; 2003.
  20. Wang C, Zhang H, Zhang Y, Guo L, Wang Y, Thira Htun TT. Influences on the seismic response of a gravity dam with different foundation and reservoir modeling assumptions. Water (Basel). 2021;13(21):3072.
  21. Yesane PM, Ghugal YM, Wankhade RL. Study on soil-structure interaction: a review. Int J Eng Res. 2016;5(3):737-741.
  22. Pan JW, Song CM, Zhang CH. Simple model for gravity dam response considering radiation damping effects. J Hydraul Eng. 2010;41:493-498.
  23. Ghaedi K, Hejazi F, Ibrahim Z, Khanzaei P. Flexible foundation effect on seismic analysis of roller compacted concrete (RCC) dams using finite element method. KSCE J Civ Eng. 2017;22:1275-1287.
  24. Bayraktar A, Hançer E, Akköse M. Influence of base-rock characteristics on the stochastic dynamic response of dam–reservoir– foundation systems. Eng Struct. 2005;27:1498-1508.
  25. Stucky A. Le barrage des Beni-bahdel: ouvrage en béton armé à voutes de 20 m de portée. [Internet]. 1937.
  26. Geometrical and geotechnical report of El Mefrouche multi-arch dam. [Old paper document].
  27. Geometrical and geotechnical report of Beni-bahdel multi-arch dam. [Paper document].
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ama-2023-0052 | Journal eISSN: 2300-5319 | Journal ISSN: 1898-4088
Language: English
Page range: 452 - 459
Submitted on: Feb 1, 2023
Accepted on: May 3, 2023
Published on: Jul 16, 2023
Published by: Bialystok University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2023 Amina Tahar Berrabah, Amina Attia, Daoudi Mohammed Habib, Djamel Ouzandja, published by Bialystok University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.