Design and Analysis of a Novel Concept-Based Unmanned Aerial Vehicle with Ground Traversing Capability

Kumar, Ramanuj; Gour, Surjeet S.; Pandey, Anish; Kumar, Shrestha; Mohan, Abhijeet; Shashwat, Pratik; Sahoo, Ashok K.

Design and Analysis of a Novel Concept-Based Unmanned Aerial Vehicle with Ground Traversing Capability

Acta Mechanica et Automatica

Volume 16 (2022): Issue 3 (September 2022)

By:

Ramanuj Kumar

, Surjeet S. Gour, Anish Pandey

, Shrestha Kumar, Abhijeet Mohan, Pratik Shashwat and Ashok K. Sahoo

Open Access

|May 2022

References

1. Xiang H, Tian L. Development of a low-cost agricultural remote sensing system based on an autonomous unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). Biosystems Engg. 2011;108(2):174–190.10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2010.11.010
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
2. Tahar KN, Ahmad A. A simulation study on the capabilities of rotor wing unmanned aerial vehicle in aerial terrain mapping. Int J of Phy Sci. 2012;7(8):1300–1306.10.5897/IJPS11.969
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
3. Wang Z, McDonald ST. Convex relaxation for optimal rendezvous of unmanned aerial and ground vehicles, Aero Sci and Tech. 2020;99:1–19.10.1016/j.ast.2020.105756
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
4. Glida HE, Abdou L, Chelihi A, Sentouh C. Optimal model-free backstepping control for a quadrotor helicopter. Nonlin Dyna. 2020;100(4):3449–3468.10.1007/s11071-020-05671-x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
5. Labbadi M, Cherkaoui M. Novel robust super twisting integral sliding mode controller for a quadrotor under external disturbances. Int J of Dyna and Cont. 2020;8:805–815.10.1007/s40435-019-00599-6
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
6. Hassani H, Mansouri A, Ahaitouf A. Robust autonomous flight for quadrotor UAV based on adaptive nonsingular fast terminal sliding mode control. Int J of Dyna and Cont. 2021;9(2):619–635.10.1007/s40435-020-00666-3
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
7. Selma B, Chouraqui S, Abouaïssa H. Optimal trajectory tracking control of unmanned aerial vehicle using ANFIS-IPSO system. Int J of Info Techn. 2020;12(2):383–395.10.1007/s41870-020-00436-6
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
8. Elijah T, Jamisola RS, Tjiparuro Z, Namoshe M (2020). A review on control and maneuvering of cooperative fixed-wing drones. Int J of Dyna and Cont. 202;9(3):1332–1349.10.1007/s40435-020-00710-2
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
9. Heidari H, Saska M. Trajectory Planning of Quadrotor Systems for Various Objective Functions. Robo. 2021;39(1):137–152.10.1017/S0263574720000247
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
10. Abdalla M, Al-Baradie S. Real time optimal tuning of quadcopter attitude controller using particle swarm optimization, J of Eng and Techno Sci. 2020;52(5):745–764.10.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2020.52.5.10
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
11. Pinto MF, Honório LM, Marcato AL, Dantas MA, Melo AG, Capretz M, Urdiales C. ARCog: An Aerial Robotics Cognitive Architecture. Robo. 2021;39(3):483–502.10.1017/S0263574720000521
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
12. Xu H, Jiang S, Zhang A. Path Planning for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Using a Mix-Strategy-Based Gravitational Search Algorithm. IEEE Access, 2021;9:57033–57045.10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3072796
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
13. Zhang X, Duan H. An improved constrained differential evolution algorithm for unmanned aerial vehicle global route planning. Appl Soft Comp. 2015;26:270–284.10.1016/j.asoc.2014.09.046
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
14. Roberge V, Tarbouchi M, Labonté G. Comparison of parallel genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization for real-time UAV path planning. IEEE Trans on Indu Informat. 2012;9(1):132–141.10.1109/TII.2012.2198665
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
15. Mou C, Qing-Xian W, Chang-Sheng J. A modified ant optimization algorithm for path planning of UCAV. Appl Soft Comp. 2008;8(4):1712–1718.10.1016/j.asoc.2007.10.011
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
16. Duan H, Liu S, Wu J. Novel intelligent water drops optimization approach to single UCAV smooth trajectory planning. Aero Sci and Tech, 2009;13(8):442–449.10.1016/j.ast.2009.07.002
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
17. Silva Arantes JD, Silva Arantes MD, Motta Toledo CF, Júnior OT, Williams BC. Heuristic and genetic algorithm approaches for UAV path planning under critical situation. Int J on Art Intel Tools. 2017;26(01):1760008–1760037.10.1142/S0218213017600089
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
18. Besada-Portas E, De La Torre L, Moreno A, Risco-Martin JL. On the performance comparison of multi-objective evolutionary UAV path planners. Info Sci, 2013;238:111–125.10.1016/j.ins.2013.02.022
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
19. Cui Z, Wang Y. UAV Path Planning Based on Multi-Layer Reinforcement Learning Technique. IEEE Access. 2021;9:59486–59497.10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3073704
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
20. Yao M, Zhao M. Unmanned aerial vehicle dynamic path planning in an uncertain environment. Robo. 2015;33(3):611–621.10.1017/S0263574714000514
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ama-2022-0021 | Journal eISSN: 2300-5319 | Journal ISSN: 1898-4088

Journal RSS Feed

Language: English

Page range: 169 - 179

Submitted on: Nov 26, 2021

Accepted on: Mar 1, 2022

Published on: May 16, 2022

Published by: Bialystok University of Technology

In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

Keywords:

unmanned aerial vehicle,

unmanned ground vehicle,

Related subjects:

Electrical engineering,

Electronics,

Mechanical engineering,

Mechanics,

Bioengineering and biomedical engineering,

Biomechanics,

Civil engineering,

Environmental engineering

© 2022 Ramanuj Kumar, Surjeet S. Gour, Anish Pandey, Shrestha Kumar, Abhijeet Mohan, Pratik Shashwat, Ashok K. Sahoo, published by Bialystok University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 16 (2022): Issue 3 (September 2022)Next article