Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A Neural-Fuzzy Approach for Fault Diagnosis of Hybrid Dynamical Systems: Demonstration on Three-Tank System Cover

A Neural-Fuzzy Approach for Fault Diagnosis of Hybrid Dynamical Systems: Demonstration on Three-Tank System

Open Access
|May 2021

References

  1. 1. Abdallah I., Gehin A.-L., Bouamama B. O. (2016), Event driven hybrid bond graph for diagnosis, 2016 European Control Conference (ECC), 2353–2358.10.1109/ECC.2016.7810642
  2. 2. Abid A., Khan M.T., Lang H., de Silva C.W. (2019), Adaptive system identification and severity index-based fault diagnosis in motors, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 24(4), 1628–1639.10.1109/TMECH.2019.2917749
  3. 3. Achbi M.S., Kechida S. (2017), Hybrid dynamic systems fault diagnosis approach based on hybrid automata and ANFIS, The 2 Nd International Conference on Applied Automation and Industrial Diagnostics, ICAAID2017.
  4. 4. Achbi M.S., Kechida S. (2017a), Fault diagnosis of a reverse osmosis water desalination plant through a hybrid approach, ICENT2017.
  5. 5. Achbi M.S., Kechida S. (2017b), Fault tolerant control of Reverse Osmosis Desalination Plant with the application of SCADA system, The 2nd International Conference on Applied Automation and Industrial Diagnostics, ICAAID2017.
  6. 6. Achbi M.S., Kechida S. (2020), Methodology for monitoring and diagnosing faults of hybrid dynamic systems: A case study on a desalination plant, Diagnostyka, 21(1), 1641–6414.10.29354/diag/116076
  7. 7. Achbi M.S., Mhamdi L., Kechida S., Dhouibi H. (2020), Methodology to knowledge discovery for fault diagnosis of hybrid dynamical systems: demonstration on two tanks system, Diagnostyka, 21.10.29354/diag/130617
  8. 8. Alur R., Courcoubetis C., Henzinger T.A., Ho P.-H. (1992), Hybrid automata: An algorithmic approach to the specification and verification of hybrid systems, Hybrid systems, 209–229, Springer.10.1007/3-540-57318-6_30
  9. 9. Antsaklis P., Koutsoukos X. (1997), On hybrid control of complex systems: A survey, ISIS, 97, 017.
  10. 10. Asma T., Islem L., Zanzouri N., Ksouri M. (2015), Robust diagnosis for hybrid dynamical systems, 2015 IEEE 12th International Multi-Conference on Systems, Signals Devices (SSD15), 1–6.10.1109/SSD.2015.7348222
  11. 11. Belkacem L., Mhamdi L., Simeu-Abazi Z., Messaoud H., Gascard E. (2016), Diagnosis of Hybrid Dynamical Systems through Hybrid Automata, IFAC-PapersOnLine, 49(12), 990–995.10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.07.571
  12. 12. Belkhiat D E.C., Manamanni N., Messai N., Djemai M. (2012), Fault detection isolation for a class of hybrid systems: A dedicated switched robust observer scheme, 2012 20th Mediterranean Conference on Control Automation (MED), 984–989.10.1109/MED.2012.6265766
  13. 13. Belkhiat D.E.C., Messai N., Manamanni N. (2011), Design of a robust fault detection based observer for linear switched systems with external disturbances, Nonlinear Analysis: Hybrid Systems, 5(2), 206–219.10.1016/j.nahs.2010.10.009
  14. 14. Branicky M. S. (1995), Studies in hybrid systems: Modeling, analysis, and control, Massachusetts Inst Of Tech Cambridge Lab For Information And Decision Systems.
  15. 15. Chanthery E., Pencolé Y., Ribot P., Travé-Massuyès L. (2015), HYDIAG: Extended diagnosis and prognosis for hybrid systems.
  16. 16. Chanthery E., Sztyber A., Travé-Massuyès L., Pérez-Zuñiga C.G. (2020), Process decomposition and test selection for distributed fault diagnosis, International Conference on Industrial, Engineering and Other Applications of Applied Intelligent Systems, 914-925, Springer, Cham.10.1007/978-3-030-55789-8_78
  17. 17. Cocquempot V., El Mezyani T., Staroswiecki M. (2004), Fault detection and isolation for hybrid systems using structured parity residuals, 2004 5th Asian Control Conference (IEEE Cat. No. 04EX904), 2, 1204–1212.
  18. 18. Daher A. (2018), Default diagnosis and prognosis for a preventive and predictive maintenance, Application to a distillation column [PhD Thesis].
  19. 19. Deng Y., D’Innocenzo, A., Julius A.A. (2015), Trajectory-based observer for hybrid automata fault diagnosis, 2015 54th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), 942–947.10.1109/CDC.2015.7401994
  20. 20. Derbel H. (2009), Diagnostic à base de modèles des systèmes temporisés et d’une sous-classe de systèmes dynamiques hybrides [PhD Thesis].
  21. 21. Ekanayake T., Dewasurendra D., Abeyratne S., Ma L., Yarlagadda P. (2019), Model-based fault diagnosis and prognosis of dynamic systems: A review, Procedia Manufacturing, 30, 435–442.10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.060
  22. 22. Favela Contreras A. (1999), Modélisation et analyse du comportement dynamique des systèmes hybrides: Une approche basée sur le modèle d’automate hybride [PhD Thesis], Grenoble INPG.
  23. 23. Gara H., Saad K.B. (2020), Fault diagnosis for hybrid systems based on a bank of linear observers and a discrete automaton, SN Applied Sciences, 2(11), 1-9.10.1007/s42452-020-03564-7
  24. 24. Guo D., Zhong M., Ji H., Liu Y., Yang R. (2018), A hybrid feature model and deep learning based fault diagnosis for unmanned aerial vehicle sensors, Neurocomputing, 319, 155-163.10.1016/j.neucom.2018.08.046
  25. 25. Jang J.-S. (1992), Neuro-fuzzy modeling: Architectures, analyses, and applications, University of California, Berkeley.
  26. 26. Karsai G., Abdelwahed, S., Biswas, G. (2003), Integrated diagnosis and control for hybrid dynamic systems, AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, 5673.10.2514/6.2003-5673
  27. 27. Kechida S. (2007), Synthèse des générateurs de résidus robustes pour la détection de défauts [PhD Thesis], Université de Annaba-Badji Mokhtar.
  28. 28. Mahmoud M.S. (2018), Fuzzy control, estimation and diagnosis, Saudi Arabia: Springer International.10.1007/978-3-319-54954-5
  29. 29. Mhamdi L., Achbi M. S., Dhouibi H., Kechida S. (2020), Diagnosis of hybrid systems through bond graph, observers and timed automata, Diagnostyka, 21.10.29354/diag/126444
  30. 30. MI Rahal B. (2018), Modeling and robust fault diagnosis of hybrid system based on hybrid bond graph approach, Int Rob Auto J, 4(4), 266–272.10.15406/iratj.2018.04.00135
  31. 31. Olivier-Maget N., Hétreux G., Le Lann J.-M., Le Lann M.-V. (2008), Fault detection and isolation based on the model-based approach: Application on chemical processes, Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, 25, 411–416, Elsevier.10.1016/S1570-7946(08)80073-9
  32. 32. Patel H.R., Raval S.K., Shah V.A. (2021), A novel design of optimal intelligent fuzzy TID controller employing GA for nonlinear level control problem subject to actuator and system component fault, International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics.10.1108/IJICC-11-2020-0174
  33. 33. Pérez-Zuñiga G., Rivas-Perez R., Sotomayor-Moriano J., Sánchez-Zurita V. (2020), Fault Detection and Isolation System Based on Structural Analysis of an Industrial Seawater Reverse Osmosis Desalination Plant, Processes, 8(9), 1100.10.3390/pr8091100
  34. 34. Pisano A., Rapaić M. R., Usai E. (2014), Discontinuous dynamical systems for fault detection, A unified approach including fractional and integer order dynamics, Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 95, 111–125.10.1016/j.matcom.2012.09.007
  35. 35. Pislaru M., Trandabat A.F., Schreiner C. (2006), Neuro-fuzzy surveillance for industrial process fault detection.
  36. 36. Rivas-Perez R., Sotomayor-Moriano J., Pérez-Zuñiga G., Soto-Angles M.E. (2019), Real-time implementation of an expert model predictive controller in a pilot-scale reverse osmosis plant for brackish and seawater desalination, Applied Sciences, 9(14), 2932.10.3390/app9142932
  37. 37. Sadhukhan C., Mitra S.K., Naskar M.K., Sharifpur M. (2021), Fault diagnosis of a nonlinear hybrid system using adaptive unscented Kalman filter bank, Engineering with Computers, 1-12.10.1007/s00366-020-01235-0
  38. 38. Sayed-Mouchaweh M. (2018), Fault diagnosis of hybrid dynamic and complex systems, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-74014-0
  39. 39. Sengupta S., Mukhopadhyay S., Deb A., Pattada K., De S. (2012), Hybrid automata modeling of SI gasoline engines towards state estimation for fault diagnosis, SAE International Journal of Engines, 5(3), 759–781.10.4271/2011-01-2434
  40. 40. Subbaraj P., Kannapiran B. (2011), Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system approach for fault detection and diagnosis of pneumatic valve in cement industry, International Journal of Computational Intelligence and Applications, 10(04), 399–423.10.1142/S1469026811003161
  41. 41. Sun S., Cui Z., Zhang X., Tian W. (2020), A hybrid inverse problem approach to model-based fault diagnosis of a distillation column, Processes, 8(1), 55.10.3390/pr8010055
  42. 42. Tabatabaeipour S., Ravn A.P., Izadi-zamabadi R., Bak T. (2009), Active diagnosis of hybrid systems—A model predictive approach, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Control and Automation, 465–470.10.1109/ICCA.2009.5410420
  43. 43. Tsuda K., Mignone D., Ferrari-Trecate G., Morari M. (2001), Reconfiguration strategies for hybrid systems, Proceedings of the 2001 American Control Conference (Cat. No. 01CH37148), 2, 868–873.10.1109/ACC.2001.945826
  44. 44. Uppal F. J., Patton R. J., Palade V. (2002), Neuro-fuzzy based fault diagnosis applied to an electro-pneumatic valve, IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 35(1), 477–482.10.3182/20020721-6-ES-1901.01633
  45. 45. Van Gorp J. (2013), Diagnostic et observation d’une classe de systèmes dynamiques hybrids, Application au convertisseur multicellulaire série [PhD Thesis].
  46. 46. Vento Maldonado J., Travé-Massuyès L., Sarrate Estruch R., Puig Cayuela V. (2013), Hybrid automaton incremental construction for online diagnosis, Proceedings DX’13, 186–191.
  47. 47. Viharos Z. J., Kis K. B. (2015), Survey on neuro-fuzzy systems and their applications in technical diagnostics and measurement, Measurement, 67, 126–136.10.1016/j.measurement.2015.02.001
  48. 48. Zhirabok A., Shumsky A. (2018), Fault diagnosis in nonlinear hybrid systems, International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, 28(4), 635–648.10.2478/amcs-2018-0049
  49. 49. Zouaghi L., Alexopoulos A., Wagner A., Badreddin E. (2011), Modified particle petri nets for hybrid dynamical systems monitoring under environmental uncertainties, 2011 IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration (SII), 497–502.10.1109/SII.2011.6147499
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ama-2021-0001 | Journal eISSN: 2300-5319 | Journal ISSN: 1898-4088
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 8
Submitted on: Mar 22, 2020
Accepted on: Mar 10, 2021
Published on: May 15, 2021
Published by: Bialystok University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2021 Mohammed Said Achbi, Sihem Kechida, Lotfi Mhamdi, Hedi Dhouibi, published by Bialystok University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.