Have a personal or library account? Click to login
An Exploratory Study on the Accuracy of Parts Printed in FDM Processes from Novel Materials Cover

An Exploratory Study on the Accuracy of Parts Printed in FDM Processes from Novel Materials

Open Access
|Apr 2020

References

  1. 1. Adamczak S. (2008), Surface geometric measurements – in Polish, WNT, Warszawa.
  2. 2. Al-Hariri L. A., Leonhardt B., Nowotarski M., Magi J., Chambliss K., Venzel T., Delekar S. and Acquah S. (2016), Carbon Nanotubes and Graphene as Additives in 3D Printing. Carbon Nanotubes, Current Progress of their Polymer Composites, 221–251, https://scholarworks.umass.edu/chem_faculty_pubs/1448.
  3. 3. Alsoufi M. S., Elsayed A. E., (2018), Surface Roughness Quality and Dimensional Accuracy - A Comprehensive Analysis of 100% In-fill Printed Parts Fabricated by a Personal/Desktop Cost-Effective FDM 3D Printer, Materials Sciences and Applications, 9, 11–40.10.4236/msa.2018.91002
  4. 4. Bähr F., Westkamper E. (2018) Correlations between Influencing Parameters and Quality Properties of Components Produced by Fused Deposition Modeling, Procedia CIRP, 72, 1214–1219.10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.048
  5. 5. Barczewski M., Chmielewska D., Sterzyński T., Andrzejewski J. (2012), The assessment of properties of nucleated isotactic polypropylene modified with silsesquioxanes – in Polish, Przetwórstwo Tworzyw, 5, 409–413.
  6. 6. Blok L. G., Longana M. L., Yu H., Woods B. K. S. (2018), An investigation into 3D printing of fibre reinforced thermoplastic, Additive Manufacturing, 22, 176–186.10.1016/j.addma.2018.04.039
  7. 7. Calcagnile P., Cacciatore G., Demitri C., Montagna F. and Corcione C. E. (2018), Fused Deposition Modeling 3D PrinterA Feasibility Study of Processing Polydimethylsiloxane–Sodium Carboxymethylcellulose Composites by a Low-Cost Fused Deposition Modeling 3D Printer, Materials, 11, 1578, 1–14.10.3390/ma11091578616370730200428
  8. 8. Dikshit V., Nagalingam A., Yap Y. L., Sing S. L., Yeong W. Y. and Wei J. (2017), Investigation of quasi-static indentation response of inkjet printed sandwich structures under various indenter geometries, Materials, 10 (3), 290, 1–18.10.3390/ma10030290550331028772649
  9. 9. Dudek P., Zagórski K. (2017), Cost, resources, and energy efficiency of Additive Manufacturing, E3S Web of Conferences, ISSN 2267-1242, 14, 1–8.10.1051/e3sconf/20171401040
  10. 10. Duo Dong Goh, Yee Ling Yap, Shweta Agarwala, and Wai Yee Yeong (2019), Recent Progress in Additive Manufacturing of Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composite, Adv. Mater. Technol., 4, WILEYVCH Weinheim, 856–863.10.1002/admt.201800271
  11. 11. Gołębiowski J. (2004), Polymer nanocomposites. Structure, synthesis and properties – in Polish. Przemysł Chemiczny, 83, 1, 15–20.
  12. 12. Grzesik W. (2016), Prediction of the Functional Performance of Machined Components Based on Surface Topography: State of the Art, 25(10), 4460–4468.10.1007/s11665-016-2293-z
  13. 13. Guillemot G.,Bigerelle M., and Khawaja Z. (2014), 3D Parameter to Quantify the Anisotropy Measurement of Periodic Structures on Rough Surfaces, Scanning, 36, 127–133.10.1002/sca.2110823824916
  14. 14. Hashimoto F. (2016), Characteristics and Performance of surface created by various finishing methods, Procedia CIRP, 45, 1–6.10.1016/j.procir.2016.02.052
  15. 15. Hofstätter T., Pedersen, Bue D., Tosello G., Nørgaard H. (2019), State-of-the-art of fiber-reinforced polymers in additive manufacturing technologies, Journal of Reinforced Plastics & Composites, 36(15), 1061–1073.10.1177/0731684417695648
  16. 16. ISO/ASTM 52900:2015, Additive manufacturing – General principles – Terminology.
  17. 17. Kaczyński R., Wilczewska I., A. Sfiridienok (2014), Peculiarities of the wear mechanism of polymers reinforced with unidirectional carbon fibers, Friction and Wear, 35 (6), 449–454.10.3103/S1068366614060178
  18. 18. Knoop F., Kloke A., and Schoeppner V. (2018), Quality improvement of FDM parts by parameter optimization, AIP Conference Proceedings, 190001-1–190001-5.10.1063/1.5016790
  19. 19. Kumar S., Panneerselvam K. (2016), Two-body Abrasive Wear Behavior of Nylon 6 and Glass Fiber Reinforced (GFR) Nylon 6 Composite, Procedia Technology, 25 (2016) 1129–1136.10.1016/j.protcy.2016.08.228
  20. 20. Kwiatkowski D., Kwiatkowska M. (2012), Numerical analysis of volume shrinkage of polyacetal composites with glass fibre – in Polish, Przetwórstwo Tworzyw, 5, 452–455.
  21. 21. Ligon S.C., Liska R., Stampfl J., Gurr M. and Mulhaupt R. (2017), Polymers for 3D Printing and Customized Additive Manufacturing, Chemical Review, 117, 10212−10290.10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00074555310328756658
  22. 22. Liua Z., Lei Q., Xinga S. (2019), Mechanical characteristics of wood, ceramic, metal and carbon fiber-based PLA composites fabricated by FDM, Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 8(5), 3741–3751.10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.06.034
  23. 23. Loncierz D., Kajzer W. (2016), Influence of 3D printing parameters in the FDM technology on mechanical and utility properties of objects made of PLA – in Polish, Aktualne Problemy Biomechaniki, No. 10, 43–48.
  24. 24. Mathiaa T. G., Pawlus P., Wieczorowski M. (2011), Recent trends in surface metrology, Wear, Vol. 271, No. 3–4, 494–508.10.1016/j.wear.2010.06.001
  25. 25. Mohan N., Senthil P., Vinodh S. & Jayanth N. (2017), A review on composite materials and process parameters optimisation for the fused deposition modelling process, Virtual and Physical Prototyping, Vol. 12, No. 1, 47–59.10.1080/17452759.2016.1274490
  26. 26. Nuñez P. J., Rivas A., García-Plaza E., BeamudE., Sanz-Lobera A. (2015), Dimensional and surface texture characterization in Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) with ABS plus, The Manufacturing Engineering Society International Conference MESIC 2015, Procedia Engineering,132, 856–863.10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.570
  27. 27. Petropoulos G., Pandazaras C. N., Davim P. (2010), Surface Texture Characterization and Evaluation Related to Machining. Surface Integrity in Machining, Springer, 37–66.10.1007/978-1-84882-874-2_2
  28. 28. PN-EN ISO 25178-6 (2011), Geometrical product specifications (GPS) — Surface texture: Areal — Part 6: Classification of methods for measuring surface texture – in Polish.
  29. 29. PN-EN ISO 286-1 (2011), Geometrical product specifications (GPS) – ISO code system for tolerances on linear sizes – Part 1: Basis of tolerances, deviations and fits – in Polish.
  30. 30. PN-EN ISO 4287:1999/A1 (2010), Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) - Surface texture: Profile method - Terms, definitions and surface texture parameters – in Polish.
  31. 31. PN-EN ISO 4288 (1997), Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) — Surface texture: Profile method — Rules and procedures for the assessment of surface texture - in Polish.
  32. 32. Prusinowski A., Kaczyński R. (2017), Simulation of processes occurring in the extrusion head used in additive manufacturing technology, Acta Mechanica et Automatica, 11 (4), 317–321.10.1515/ama-2017-0049
  33. 33. Roberson D.A., Shemelya C. M., MacDonald E., Wicker R. B. (2015), Expanding the Applicability of FDM-type Technologies Through Materials Development, Rapid Prototyping Journal, 21 (2),137–143.10.1108/RPJ-12-2014-0165
  34. 34. Singh R., Vatsalya (2015), Evolution of 3D Surface Parameters: A Comprehensive Survey, The International Journal of Engineering and Science, 4 (2), 4–10.
  35. 35. Spoerk M., Holzer C., Gonzalez-Gutierrez J. (2019), Material extrusion-based additive manufacturing of polypropylene: A review on how to improve dimensional inaccuracy and warpage, J. Appl. Polym. SCI, DOI: 10.1002/app.48545, 1–14.10.1002/app.48545
  36. 36. Tomiċ D., Fuduriċ A., Mihaliċ T., Simuniċ N. (2017), Dimensional accuracy of prototypes made with FDM technology, Journal of Energy Technology, 2, 51–59.
  37. 37. Triantaphyllou A., Giusca C., Macaulay G., Roerig F., Hoebel M., Leach R., Tomita B., Milne K. (2015), Surface texture measurement for additive manufacturing, Surface Topography: Metrology and Properties, 3, 1–8.10.1088/2051-672X/3/2/024002
  38. 38. Umaras E.,Tsuzuki M. S. G. (2017), Additive Manufacturing - Considerations on Geometric Accuracy and Factors of Influence, IFAC PapersOnLine, 50 (1), 14940–14945.10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.2545
  39. 39. Wang T.- M., Xi J.-U., Jin Y. (2007), A model research for prototype warp deformation in the FDM process, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 33, 1087–1096.10.1007/s00170-006-0556-9
  40. 40. Wieczorowski M. (2013), Theoretical basis of spatial analysis of surface asperities – in Polish, Inżynieria Maszyn, 18(3), 7–34. www.formfutura.com (access 07.09.2019).
  41. 41. www.markforged.com (access 07.09.2019).
  42. 42. www.rp-tech.pl (access 07.09.2019).
  43. 43. Zabala A., Blunt L., Wilson W., Aginagalde A., Gomez X. and Mondragon I. L. (2018), The use of areal surface topography characterisation in relation to fatigue performance, MATEC Web of Conferences, 165, 1–6.10.1051/matecconf/201816514013
  44. 44. Zawistowski H. (2008), Basics of the theory of shaping the properties of products in the process of injection of thermoplastics – in Polish, Mechanik, 4, 274–280.
  45. 45. Żuchowska D. (2000), Constructional polymers – in Polish, WNT, Warszawa
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ama-2020-0009 | Journal eISSN: 2300-5319 | Journal ISSN: 1898-4088
Language: English
Page range: 59 - 68
Submitted on: Oct 25, 2019
|
Accepted on: Apr 28, 2020
|
Published on: Apr 30, 2020
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2020 Halina Nieciąg, Rafał Kudelski, Piotr Dudek, Jacek Cieślik, published by Bialystok University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.