References
- Agboola, O.P., İrgin Uzun, T., Soydaş Çakır, H. (2025) “Critical spatial reasoning in designing: A visitor’s centre relating to Beylikdüzü archaeological site, İstanbul”, New Design Ideas, 9(2), pp. 382–409. https://doi.org/10.62476/ndi.92382
- Baldwin, S., Ching, Y.H. (2017) “Interactive storytelling: Opportunities for online course design”, TechTrends, Vol. 61, pp. 179–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0136-2
- Benson, N.C., Ginsburg, J., Grand, V., Lazyan, M., Weeks, M. (2012) “The psychology book: Big ideas simply explained”, Dorling Kindersley, New York, USA.
- Berg, B.L., Lune, H. (2017) “Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences”, Pearson, Harlow, UK.
- Bits ‘n Bricks (2017) “Location mining in Kadıköy”, Bits ‘n Bricks. [online] Available at: http://bitsnbricks.com/location-mining/ (Accessed: 9 Oct 2025)
- Blair, J.M., Pijawka, K.D., Steiner, F. (1998) “Public Art in Mitigation Planning: The Experience of the Squaw Peak Parkway in Phoenix”, Journal of the American Planning Association, 64(2), pp. 221–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369808975977
- Borkin, M.A., Bylinskii, Z., Kim, N.W., Bainbridge, C.M., Yeh, C.S., Borkin, D. (2016) “Beyond memorability: Visualization recognition and recall”, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 22(1), pp. 519–528. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2015.2467732
- Cheung, M., Smith, N., Craven, O. (2022) “The Impacts of Public Art on Cities, Places and People’s Lives”, The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, 52(1), pp. 37–50.
- Chung, J. (2010) “Temporality of Public Art: its Evocative Function of Space and Time in Everyday Life”, master’s thesis, Lunds University, Sweden. Dağdelen, C. (2019) “Mimari Tasarım Sürecinde Sosyal Medyanın Analiz
- Verisi Olarak Kullanılması” (Using Social Media as Analysis Data in the Architectural Design Process), master thesis, Istanbul Kültür University, Istanbul, Turkey. (in Turkish)
- Davis, T.M., Bainbridge, W.A. (2023) “Memory for artwork is predictable”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(28), e2302389120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2302389120
- De Oliveira, N., Oxley, N., Petry, M. (2005) “Yeni Milenyumda Enstalasyon Sanatı Duyular İmparatorluğu” (Installation Art in the New Millennium: Empire of the Senses), Akbank Kültür Sanat Publication, Istanbul, Turkey. (in Turkish)
- Dubey, R., Peterson, J., Khosla, A., Yang, M.H., Ghanem, B. (2015) “What makes an object memorable?”, IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Santiago, Chile, pp. 1089–1097. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2015.130
- Gürbüz, S., Şahin, F. (2018) “Research Methods in Social Sciences”, Seçkin, Ankara, Turkey.
- Hyundai Artlab (2025) “Hyundai Commission: Cecilia Vicuña”, Hyundai. [online] Available at: https://artlab.hyundai.com/project/hyundai-commission-cecilia-vicuna
- Judah, H. (2022) “It’s Time to Wake Up’: Artist Cecilia Vicuña on Her Monumental Soft Sculptures and Their Hard Message about Planetary Survival”, Artnet Worldwide Corporation. [online] Available at: https://news.artnet.com/art-world/cecilia-vicuna-tate-2189372 (Accessed: 2 May 2023)
- Khairudin, R., Taib, N.M., Polko, J.A., Nasir, R. (2013) “The role of feedback types on false memory in children and adolescents”, Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 21(S), pp. 155–171.
- Knapp, M.L., Stohl, C., Reardon, K.K. (1981) “Memorable” messages”, Journal of Communication, 31(4), pp. 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1981.tb00448.x
- Konkle, T., Brady, T.F., Alvarez, G.A., Oliva, A. (2010) “Conceptual distinctiveness supports detailed visual long-term memory for real-world objects”, Journal of Experimental Psychology, General, 139(3), pp. 558–578. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019165
- KVTKN, P., Ramakrishnudu, T. (2022) “A novel method for detecting psychological stress at tweet level using neighborhood tweets”, Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, 34(9), pp. 6663-6680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2021.08.015
- Lacy, S. (1995) “Debated territory: Toward a critical language for public art, Mapping the train: New genre public art”, Bay Press, Seattle, USA.
- Larsen, R. (2017) “The Tate Modern and The Battle for London’s Soul”, The New York Times. [online] Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/18/travel/tate-modern-london-museum-city-evolution.html (Accessed: 2 May 2023)
- Lefebvre, H. (2014) “Mekanın Üretimi” (Production of Space), Sel Publication, Istanbul, Turkey. (in Turkish)
- Oktay, D. (2003) “Kamusal Mekânda Sanata Güncel Bir Bakış” (A Contemporary Perspective on Art in Public Spaces), Yapı Mimarlık Kültür Sanat Journal, Vol. 264, pp. 105-109. (in Turkish)
- Öymen Özak, N., Pulat Gökmen, G. (2009) “Bellek ve Mekan İlişkisi Üzerine BirModel Önerisi” (A Model Proposal on the Relationship between Memory and Space), İTÜDERGİSİ/a, 8(2), pp. 145–155. [online] Available at: http://itudergi.itu.edu.tr/index.php/itudergisi_a/article/viewFile/217/195 (in Turkish)
- Pallasmaa, J. (2011) “Tenin Gözleri: Mimarlık ve Duyular” (Eyes of the Skin: Architecture and the Senses), Yem Yayınları, Istanbul, Turkey. (in Turkish)
- Parikh, D., Isola, P., Torralba, A., Oliva, A. (2012) “Understanding the intrinsic memorability of images”, Journal of Vision, 12(9), 1082. https://doi.org/10.1167/12.9.1082
- Phillips, P.C. (1989) ‘Temporality and Public Art”, Art Journal, 48(4), pp. 331–335. https://doi.org/10.2307/777018
- Rosenthal, M.L. (2003) “Understanding Installation Art: From Duchamp to Holzer”, Prestel Publishing, London, UK.
- Sarıkartal, Z. (2007) “Sanat Alanının Küresel Kurumsallaşması ve Yerleştirmenin (Enstalasyon) Gelişimi” (The Global Institutionalization of the Art Field and the Development of Installation), Sanat Yazıları Journal, 16(spring), pp. 139-154. (in Turkish)
- Searle, A. (2022) ‘Cecilia Vicuña review – the most moving Tate Turbine Hall installation for years’, The Guardian. [online] Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2022/oct/10/cecilia-vicunas-brain-forest-quipu-turbine-hall-review-tate-modern-london (Accessed: 16 June 2023)
- Sloan, L., Morgan, J., Burnap, P., Williams, M. (2015) “Who tweets? Deriving the demographic characteristics of age, occupation and social class from Twitter user meta-data”, PLOS ONE, 10(3), e0115545. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115545
- Sözen, H.N. (2010) “Sanata Disiplinlerarası Bir Yaklaşım: Enstalasyon Sanatı ve Genco Gülan Örneklemi” (An Interdisciplinary Approach to Art: Installation Art and the Example of Genco Gülan), Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi (Art and Design Journal), 1(6), pp. 147-162. (in Turkish)
- Tate (2023a) ‘Tate Modern Map’, The Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery. [online] Available at: https://media.tate.org.uk/aztate-prd-ew-dgwgtail-st1-ctr-data/galleries/TM_map.pdf (Accessed: 1 May 2023)
- Tate (2023b) “Exhibition Guide Hyundai Commission: Cecilia Vicuña: Brain Forest Quipu”, The Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery. [online] Available at: https://www.tate.org.uk/whats-on/tate-modern/cecilia-vicu%C3%B1a/exhibition-guide (Accessed: 1 May 2023)
- Tate (2023c) “Hyundai Commission - Tania Bruguera: 10,148,451”, The Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery. [online] Available at: https://www.tate.org.uk/whats-on/tate-modern/hyundai-commission-tania-bruguera (Accessed: 1 May 2023)
- Tate (2023d) “Look behind the art at Tate Modern”, The Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery. [online] Available at: https://www.tate.org.uk/visit/tate-modern/look-behind-art-tate-modern (Accessed: 1 May 2023)
- the wub (2015) ‘File: Tate Modern turbine hall, looking West.jpg’, Wikimedia Commons. [online] Available at: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tate_Modern_turbine_hall,_looking_West.jpg (Accessed: 16 June 2023)
- Worth, M. (2003) “Public art, public space, urban design - Case studies creating significance through public places art an inclusive + interdisciplinary practice”, Waterfronts of Art III, Public Art & Urban Design: Interdisciplinary and Social Perspectives, No. 4, pp. 1-4. [online] Available at: https://raco.cat/index.php/Waterfront/article/view/214753