Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Bibliometric analysis of water at the intersection of environmental psychology and biophilic design Cover

Bibliometric analysis of water at the intersection of environmental psychology and biophilic design

By: Damla Katuk and  Emine Köseoğlu  
Open Access
|Mar 2023

References

  1. Aria, M., Cuccurullo, C. (2017) “bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis”, Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), pp. 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.00710.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
  2. Beatley, T., Newman, P. (2013) “Biophilic cities are sustainable, resilient cities”, Sustainability (Switzerland), 5(8), pp. 3328-3345. https://doi.org/10.3390/su508332810.3390/su5083328
  3. Boffi, M., Pola, L., Fumagalli, N., Fermani, E., Senes, G., Inghilleri, P. (2021) “Nature experiences of older people for active ageing: an interdisciplinary approach to the co-design of community gardens”, Frontiers in psychology, 12(1), pp. 702525. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.70252510.3389/fpsyg.2021.702525
  4. Bratman, G. N., Olvera-Alvarez, H. A., Gross, J. J. (2021) “The affective benefits of nature exposure”, Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 15(8), pp. e12630. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.1263010.1111/spc3.12630
  5. Budler, M., Župič, I., Trkman, P. (2021) “The development of business model research: a bibliometric review”, Journal of Business Research, 135, pp. 480-495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.06.04510.1016/j.jbusres.2021.06.045
  6. Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., Turner, W. A., Bauin, S. (1983) “From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis”, Social Science information, 22(2), pp. 191-235. https://doi.org/10.1177/05390188302200200310.1177/053901883022002003
  7. Clarivate Web of Science Help (2021) “Web of Science Core Collection Overview”. [online] Available at: https://webofscience.help.clarivate.com/enus/Content/wos-core-collection/wos-core-collection.htm [Accessed: 15 Feb 2023]
  8. Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E. E., Herrera, F. (2011) “Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), pp. 1382-1402. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.2152510.1002/asi.21525
  9. Corral-Verdugo, V., Mireles-Acosta, J., Tapia-Fonllem, C., Fraijo-Sing, B. (2011) “Happiness as correlate of sustainable behavior: a study of pro-ecological, frugal, equitable and altruistic actions that promote subjective well-being”, Human Ecology Review, 18(2), pp. 95-104.
  10. de Bem Machado, A., Secinaro, S., Calandra, D., Lanzalonga F. (2022) “Knowledge management and digital transformation for Industry 4.0: a structured literature review”, Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 20(2), pp. 320-338. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2021.201526110.1080/14778238.2021.2015261
  11. Ding, X., Yang, Z. (2022) “Knowledge mapping of platform research: a visual analysis using VOSviewer and CiteSpace”, Electronic Commerce Research, 22(1), pp. 787-809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-020-09410-710.1007/s10660-020-09410-7
  12. Elsevier Scopus (2020) “Scopus Content Coverage Guide”. [online] Available at: https://www.elsevier.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/69451/Scopus_ContentCoverage_Guide_WEB.pdf [Accessed: 15 Feb 2023]
  13. Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., Pappas, G. (2008) “Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses”, FASEB journal: official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 22(2), pp. 338-342. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF
  14. Gillis, K., Gatersleben, B. (2015) “A review of psychological literature on the health and wellbeing benefits of biophilic design”, Buildings, 5(3), pp. 948-963. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings503094810.3390/buildings5030948
  15. Güney, İ., Somuncu, M. (2020) “Turizm coğrafyasında yeni eğilimler: bibliyometrik göstergeler üzerinden bir ağ analizi”, Aegean Geographical Journal, 29(2), pp. 297-319. [online] Available at: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ecd/issue/58525/789323 [Accessed: 27 Jan 2023]
  16. Hung, S.-H., Chang, C.-Y. (2021) “Health benefits of evidence-based biophilic-designed environments: A review”, Journal of People Plants Environment, 24(1), pp. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.11628/ksppe.2021.24.1.110.11628/ksppe.2021.24.1.1
  17. Jo, H., Song, C., Miyazaki, Y. (2019) “Physiological benefits of viewing nature: a systematic review of indoor experiments”, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(23), pp. 4739. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph1623473910.3390/ijerph16234739
  18. Kaiser, F. G. (1998) “A general measure of ecological behavior”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(5), pp. 395-422. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01712.x10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01712.x
  19. Karagöz, D., Savaş, N. (2021) “Turizmde kültürel miras araştırmalarının haritalandırılması”, Journal of Gastronomy, Hospitality and Travel, 4(2), pp. 258-281. https://doi.org/10.33083/joghat.2021.7310.33083/joghat.2021.73
  20. Kessler, M. M. (1963) “Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers”, American Documentation, 14(1), pp. 10-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.509014010310.1002/asi.5090140103
  21. Kurutkan, M. N., Orhan, F. (2018) “Sağlık politikası konusunun bilim haritalama teknikleri ile analizi” (Analysis of health policy issue with science mapping techniques), İKSAD Publishing House, Adıyaman, Turkey. ISBN 978-605-7510-99-0 [in Turkish]
  22. Martín-Martín, A., Orduña-Malea, E., Thelwall, M. A., López-Cózar, E. D. (2018) “Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: a systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories”, Journal of Informetrics, 12(4), pp. 1160-1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOI.2018.09.00210.1016/j.joi.2018.09.002
  23. Massaro, M., Dumay, J. Guthrie, J. (2016) “On the shoulders of giants: undertaking a structured literature review in accounting”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 29(5), pp. 767-801. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-01-2015-193910.1108/AAAJ-01-2015-1939
  24. McCain, K. W. (1986) “Cocited author mapping as a valid representation of intellectual structure”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37(3), pp. 111-122. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(198605)37:3<111::AID-ASI2>3.0.CO;2-D10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(198605)37:3<;111::AID-ASI2>3.0.CO;2-D
  25. Moore, R. C., Wong, H. H. (1997) “Natural learning: The life of an environmental schoolyard: Creating environments for rediscovering nature’s way of teaching”, MIG Communications, Berkeley, California. ISBN 0-944661-24-6
  26. Moral-Muñoz, J. A., Herrera-Viedma, E. E., Santisteban-Espejo, A., Cobo, M. J. (2020) “Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review”, Profesional De La información, 29(1), e290103. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.ene.0310.3145/epi.2020.ene.03
  27. Nevzati, F., Demirbaş, Ö. O., Hasırcı, D. (2021) “Biophilic interior design: A case study on the relation between water elements and well-being of the users in an educational building”, Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi, 11(2), pp. 450-467. https://doi.org/10.20488/sanattasarim.104902310.20488/sanattasarim.1049023
  28. Özkaraca, N., Halaç, H. H. (2022) “Tarihi çevrede sürdürülebilirlik konulu lisansüstü tezlerin bibliyometrik analizi” (Bibliometric analysis of postgraduate theses on sustainability in the historical environment), Kent Akademisi Dergisi, 15(1), pp. 203-222. [in Turkish] https://doi.org/10.35674/kent.98820210.35674/kent.988202
  29. Peritz, B. C. (1988) “Bibliometric literature: a quantitative analysis” In L. Egghe, R. Rousseau (eds.), Informetrics 87/88: Select Proceedings of the First International Conference on Bibliometrics and Theoretical Aspects of Information, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, Netherlands, pp. 165-173. ISBN 0444704256
  30. Peters, T., D’Penna, K. (2020) “Biophilic design for restorative university learning environments: A critical review of literature and design recommendations”, Sustainability, 12(17), 7064. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1217706410.3390/su12177064
  31. Peters, T., Verderber, S. (2022) “Biophilic design strategies in long-term residential care environments for persons with dementia”, Journal of Aging and Environment, 36(3), pp. 227-255. https://doi.org/10.1080/26892618.2021.191881510.1080/26892618.2021.1918815
  32. Rapuano, M., Ruotolo, F., Ruggiero, G., Masullo, M., Maffei, L., Galderisi, A., Palmieri, A., Iachini, T. (2022) “Spaces for relaxing, spaces for recharging: How parks affect people’s emotions” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 81(1), pp. 101809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.10180910.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101809
  33. Santos, R., Costa, A. A., Grilo, A. M. (2017) “Bibliometric analysis and review of building information modelling literature published between 2005 and 2015”, Automation in Construction, 80(1), pp. 118-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.03.00510.1016/j.autcon.2017.03.005
  34. Sarkodie, S. A., Strezov, V. (2019) “A review on Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis using bibliometric and meta-analysis”, The Science of the total environment, 649(1), pp. 128-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.27610.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.276
  35. Scopus (2022) ‘Scopus Preview’, Elsevier B.V. [online] Available at: https://www.scopus.com/
  36. Secinaro, S., Calandra, D., Lanzalonga, F., Ferraris, A., (2022) “Electric vehicles’ consumer behaviours: Mapping the field and providing a research agenda”, Journal of Business Research, 150, pp. 399-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.06.01110.1016/j.jbusres.2022.06.011
  37. Secinaro, S., Calandra, D., Secinaro, A., Muthurangu, V., Biancone, P. (2021) “The role of artificial intelligence in healthcare: a structured literature review”, BMC medical informatics and decision making, 21(1), 125. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01488-910.1186/s12911-021-01488-9
  38. Şen, Ö. (2020) “Bibliyometrik analiz yöntemi ile ağızdan ağıza iletişim (Wom) konusunun incelenmesi” (Examination of word-of-mouth communication (WOM) with bibliometric analysis method), International Social Sciences Studies Journal, 6(54), pp. 1-10. [in Turkish] http://dx.doi.org/10.26449/sssj.191910.26449/sssj.1919
  39. Small, H. G. (1973) “Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(1), pp. 265-269. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.463024040610.1002/asi.4630240406
  40. Smith, L. C. (1981) “Citation analysis”, Library Trends, 30(1), pp. 83-106. [online] Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/2142/7190 [Accessed: 27 Jan 2023]
  41. Tranter, P. J., Malone, K. (2004) “Geographies of environmental learning: An exploration of children’s use of school grounds”, Children’s Geographies, 2(1), pp. 131-155. https://doi.org/10.1080/147332803200016881310.1080/1473328032000168813
  42. Uddin, M. S., Hossain, L., Abbasi, A., Rasmussen, K. (2012) “Trend and efficiency analysis of co-authorship network”, Scientometrics, 90(2), pp. 687-699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0511-x10.1007/s11192-011-0511-x
  43. van Eck, N. J., Waltman, L. (2010) “Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping”, Scientometrics, 84(2), pp. 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-310.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
  44. van Eck, N. J., Waltman, L. (2022) “VOSviewer Manual: Manual for VOSviewer version 1.6.18”, Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS), Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands. [online] Available at: https://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.18.pdf [Accessed: 15 Feb 2023]
  45. Web of Science Core Collection (2022) ‘Web of Science’, Clarivate. [online] Available at: https://www.webofscience.com/
  46. White, H. D., Griffith, B. C. (1981) “Author cocitation: a literature measure of intellectual structure”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32(3), pp. 163-171. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.463032030210.1002/asi.4630320302
  47. White, M. P., Smith, A. T., Humphryes, K., Pahl, S., Snelling, D., Depledge, M. (2010) “Blue space: The importance of water for preference, affect, and restorativeness ratings of natural and built scenes”, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), pp. 482-493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.04.00410.1016/j.jenvp.2010.04.004
  48. Zamani, Z. (2017) “Young children’s preferences: What stimulates children’s cognitive play in outdoor preschools?”, Journal of Early Childhood Research, 15(3), pp. 256-274. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X1561683110.1177/1476718X15616831
  49. Zupic, I., Čater, T. (2015) “Bibliometric methods in management and organization”, Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), pp. 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442811456262910.1177/1094428114562629
Language: English
Page range: 17 - 35
Submitted on: Jan 29, 2023
|
Accepted on: Mar 12, 2023
|
Published on: Mar 19, 2023
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2023 Damla Katuk, Emine Köseoğlu, published by Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.