Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Unsafe commute driving behaviour among healthcare workers: a combined scoping review and concept analysis Cover

Unsafe commute driving behaviour among healthcare workers: a combined scoping review and concept analysis

Open Access
|Sep 2025

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Article search strategy based on the PRISMA guidelines (35)
Article search strategy based on the PRISMA guidelines (35)

Figure 2

Factors affecting commute driving among HCWs
Factors affecting commute driving among HCWs

Characteristics of the reviewed studies (n=46) on HCWs’ commute driving behaviour

Type of dataCharacteristics (no. of studies)
CountryAustralia &/New Zealand (n=6)
Canada (n=1)
France (n=1)
Israel (n=2)
Malaysia (n=2)
Norway (n=1)
United Kingdom (n=2)
United States of America (n=30)
Not stated (n=1)
Year of publication1990–2000 (n=5)
2001–2010 (n=10)
2011–2020 (n=26)
2021–2022 (n=5)
Study designCross-sectional (n=21)
Case-control (n=2)
Cohort/longitudinal (n=10)
Quasi (pre/post) (n=7)
Randomised clinical trial (n=2)
Qualitative (n=4)
Study populationDoctors (including residents/interns/house officers) (n=24)
Nurses (n=15)
Mixed HCWs (n=7)
Experimental studies (N=11)Driving simulator (n=7)
Naturalistic observation (n=4)

Antecedents influencing unsafe driving behaviours while commuting among HCWs according to themes, sub-themes, and keywords

GroupsAntecedentsKey termsReferences
WorkSchedulingNight shift, long shift, quick return (<11 h between shifts), type of shift, extended duration of shift, on-call, post duty(9, 13, 32,33,34, 36, 40, 41, 44, 45, 47, 49,50,51,52, 54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66)
Profession-relatedResidency years, seniority, type of profession (doctor vs nurse vs paramedic, etc.), seniority, medical discipline (critical care vs emergency)(9,10,11, 38, 39, 42, 44, 67)
Pressure at workStress level, burnout (emotional exhaustion, personal accomplishment, depersonalisation), depression(50, 68, 69)
CommutingCommutingCommuting distance, commuting duration, commuting impedance, rural vs urban, time spent actively driving, highlighting inherent task demands, direction of commuting (home to work vs work to home)(9, 10, 35, 42, 48, 51, 60, 65, 70,71,72)
Off-workPressure outside workOff-work stress, off-work activities (care for ageing parents, continuing studies while working, second job)(69, 72)
Sleep-relatedSleep duration, sleep quality, sleep deprivation, acute sleep loss, shift work sleep disorder (shift work difficulties, difficulties remaining awake at work, tendency to fall asleep, struggle to remain awake)(12, 33, 37, 44, 47, 49, 50, 57, 58, 64, 67, 72)
IndividualIndividualAge (younger), gender (male),(11, 38, 39, 67)
State of wellbeingState of wellbeingFatigue, sleepiness, tiredness, mean blink duration (proxy for fatigue), percentage of eye closure (proxy for fatigue)(32, 36, 39, 41, 45, 46, 49, 52, 58, 62, 67, 68, 72, 73)

Differences between commute and on-duty driving (central and related concept, respectively)

CharacteristicsCommute drivingOn-duty driving
Purpose of drivingTo work and back homeFor work and other purposes
VehicleOwn vehicleEmployer’s vehicle
PassengersAlone or with spouse or childrenAlone or with colleague
Traffic hoursUsually peak hoursThroughout the day
Traffic congestionHigh during peak hoursSubject to traffic hours
Road familiarityHighly likelyHighly unlikely
GPS usageUnlikely (except for traffic alerts)Highly likely
Mode of drivingHighly “auto-mode”More vigilant

Summary of analysed studies by attributes of unsafe driving behaviour of HCW commuters and consequences of such behaviour

AttributesNumber of studiesReferences
Being asleep at the wheel / drowsy driving28(12, 13, 24, 37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61)
Rules violations (e.g., speeding, ticketing)8(12, 24, 53, 61,62,63,64,65)
Inattention / distracted driving / rumination7(24, 43, 52, 53, 61, 63, 665)
Stress / negative emotion2(55, 67)
Immediate consequences
Near crash / hazardous event21(13, 24, 37, 46,47,48, 52,53,54, 56, 57, 61, 62, 64, 68,69,70,71, 75, 77, 78,)
Crashes / collisions24(9,10,11,12,13, 37, 39, 40, 42,43,44, 46,47,48,49,50, 53, 59, 61, 64, 69, 70, 75, 77,)
Distant consequences
Individual (physical injury, emotional injury, poor quality of life, depression, burnout, fatigue)5(9, 11, 37, 44, 68)
Organisational (sick absenteeism, lower work performance and enjoyment, intention to work fewer hours)4(9, 37, 41, 44)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aiht-2025-76-3930 | Journal eISSN: 1848-6312 | Journal ISSN: 0004-1254
Language: English, Croatian, Slovenian
Page range: 148 - 158
Submitted on: Dec 1, 2024
|
Accepted on: Aug 1, 2025
|
Published on: Sep 30, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2025 Khairil Idham Ismail, Hanin Farhana Kamaruzaman, Mohd Faiz Ibrahim, Jonathan Michael Bryce, Rosnah Ismail, Hanizah Mohd Yusoff, published by Institute for Medical Research and Occupational Health
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.