Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Comparison of beautician and hairdressing apprentices with regard to skin health and skin barrier function Cover

Comparison of beautician and hairdressing apprentices with regard to skin health and skin barrier function

Open Access
|Oct 2020

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Frequency of hand washing, skin symptoms, and transepidermal water loss among hairdressing and beautician apprentices

Hairdressing apprentices (N=101)Beautician apprentices (N=76)Difference between hairdressing and beautician apprentices
Washing N (%) hands >20 times/day28 (28)20 (26)P=0.835
Self-reported history of hand/wrist eczema or urticaria N (%)35 (35)19 (25)P=0.041
Self-reported history of dry hands (without eczema or urticaria) N (%)37 (37)23 (30)P=0.082
Without history of self-reported symptoms hands) (eczema, urticaria, dry N (%)29 (29)34 (45)
One or more skin changes on clinical examination N (%)40 (40)27 (36)P=0.579
OHSI Median (IQR)3 (2–4)3 (2–4)P=0.774
TEWL Median hand (IQR) [g/m2/h]19.6 (16.7–24.8)18.6 (13.7–23.0)P=0.085
TEWL Median, forearm (IQR) [g/m2/h]12.2 (9.9–15.1)12.2 (10.3–15.0)P=0.858

[i] IQR – interquartile range; N– number of apprentices; TEWL – transepidermal water loss; OHSI – Osnabrück Hand Eczema Severity Index. P<0.05 – statistically significant difference between groups (Pearson’s chi square or Fisher test for categorical variables; Mann Whitney or t-test for continuous variables). Significance of difference in the frequency of self-reported symptoms was tested in comparison to the control group without any self-reported symptoms or dry skin

Figure 1

Self-reported ratings of hand eczema severity. The differences between the two trades in self-rated severity scores were significant (P<0.001 Mann-Whitney test) for both scales

Figure 2

Skin symptoms found during clinical examination of hands/wrists. One apprentice from each group did not complete skin examination. There was no significant statistical difference in proportions of each symptom between the hairdressing and beautician apprentices

Table 2

Predictor association with hand and forearm transepidermal water loss as outcomes

Log hand TEWL P model=0.119, adjustedR2=0.024Log forearm TEWL P model=0.303, adjustedR2=0.007
PredictorsCoefficient (95 % CI)PCoefficient (95 % CI)P
Beautician vs hairdressing apprentices-0.04 (-0.09–0.02)0.2180.04 (-0.01–0.09)0.140
Washing hands >20 times/day0.08 (0.02–0.14)0.0130.03 (-0.02–0.08)0.257
Self-eczema reported or urticaria history of hand/wrist0.03 (-0.04–0.10)0.4140.04 (-0.02–0.10)0.161
Self-(without reported eczema history or urticaria) of dry hands0.002 (-0.06–0.07)0.9300.001 (-0.05–0.06)0.953
One examination or more skin changes on clinical0.01 (-0.05–0.06)0.8550.001 (0.05–0.05)0.974
Washing measurement hands within 2 h before0.01 (-0.02–0.14)0.8210.01 (-0.04–0.06)0.660

[i] TEWL – transepidermal water loss; CI – confidence interval. Hand and forearm TEWL values were logarithmically transformed to achieve normal distribution of residuals. P denotes significance of association of a predictor with outcome (logarithmically transformed hand or forearm TEWL)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aiht-2020-71-3452 | Journal eISSN: 1848-6312 (formerly 0004-1254) | Journal ISSN: 0004-1254
Language: English, Croatian
Page range: 190 - 196
Submitted on: Jun 1, 2020
Accepted on: Jul 1, 2020
Published on: Oct 6, 2020
Published by: Institute for Medical Research and Occupational Health
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2020 Željka Babić, Tea Samardžić, Jelena Macan, published by Institute for Medical Research and Occupational Health
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.