Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Biomonitoring findings for occupational lead exposure in battery and ceramic tile workers using biochemical markers, alkaline comet assay, and micronucleus test coupled with fluorescence in situ hybridisation Cover

Biomonitoring findings for occupational lead exposure in battery and ceramic tile workers using biochemical markers, alkaline comet assay, and micronucleus test coupled with fluorescence in situ hybridisation

Open Access
|Dec 2020

Figures & Tables

Table 1

General characteristics of lead-exposed workers and controls

Parameters (mean ± SE)Exposed group (N=50)Control group (N=48)
Age (years)38.34±9.7138.65±1.53
Years of exposure10.36±8.940
B-PB (μg/L)298.36±162.0741.58±23.02
ALAD (U/L ercs)23.32±15.8756.32±9.92
EP (μmol/L ercs)3.05±3.430.98±0.27
S-B12 (ng/L)446.25±137.98473.08±166.99
S-folate (ng/L)5.83±2.317.69±3.70

[i] Significant differences (p<0.05, non-parametric Mann Whitney U test) are in bold typeface. ALAD – delta-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase activity; B-Pb – blood lead concentrations; EP – blood erythrocyte protoporphyrin concentrations; ercs – erythrocytes; S-B12 – serum vitamin B12 concentrations; SE – standard error; S-folate – serum folate concentrations

Table 2

General characteristics of lead-exposed workers and controls by gender and smoking

Exposed groupControl group
Parameters (mean±SE)Women (N=17)Men (N=33)Smokers (N=33)Non-smokers (N=17)Women (N=18)Men (N=30)Smokers (N=26)Non-smokers (N=22)
Age (years)36±2.5740±1.5736.55±1.7541.8242.035.17±2.4940.73±1.8737.15±2.2740.41±1.98
Years of exposure5.05±1.4213.39±1.609.98±1.5111.07±2.340000
B-(μPB g/L)228.13±25.20c,d340.33±30.98e299.23±27.08g296.66±43.42h28.2±3.49b47.16±5.0140.49±6.1143.14±4.22
ALAD (U/L ercs)28.21±3.48d20.92±2.91e22.12±2.63f,g25.65±4.24h55.84±2.8156.61±2.6157.85±2.6253.27±2.15
EP (μmol/L ercs)2.11±0.44e3.59±0.71e2.89±0.57g3.3540.92"0.98±0.080.98±0.061.03±0.070.9±0.06
S-B 12 (μg/L) 410.14±35.82d467.55±25.81445.93±26.69446.93±33.05537.33±46.75434.53±24.52447.38±30503.45±38.38
S-folate (ng/L) 6.41±0.66b,d5.61±0.425.26±0.38f,g7.0640.62"9.11±0.866.84±0.647.18±0.568.30±0.96

[i] Significant differences (p<0.05, non-parametric Mann Whitney U test) are in bold typeface. b – control women vs control men; c – exposed women vs exposed men; d – control women vs exposed women; a – exposed men vs control men; f – exposed smokers vs exposed non-smokers; g – exposed smokers vs control smokers; h – exposed non-smokers vs control non-smokers. ALAD – delta-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase activity; B-Pb – blood lead concentrations; EP – blood erythrocyte protoporphyrin concentrations; eras – erythrocytes; S-B12 – serum vitamin B12 concentrations; SE – standard error; S-folate – serum folate concentrations

Table 3

Micronucleus assay and alkaline comet assay endpoints in lead-exposed workers and controls by gender and smoking

Parameters (mean±SE)Total MNiNDITLTITotal NBsTotal NPBsNPB/MN ratio
Exposed (N=50)18.71±11.06a2.17±0.23a16.15±5.332.64±3.223.65±5.912.02±2.47a0.12±0.02
Controls (N=48)8.98±7.502.13±0.2514.27±1.231.61±0.742.29±2.341.14±1.530.26±0.08
Control (N=18) W8.11±1.722.22±0.0613.67±0.21b1.34±0.16b
Control (N=30) M9.5±1.412.07±0.0514.67±0.251.79±0.14
Exposed (N=17) W20.06±2.09d2.16±0.0716.19±1.28d3.04±0.92d
Exposed (N=33) M18.4±2.23e2.16±0.05e16.20±0.992.46±0.53
Control N=(26) S9.27±1.592.13±0.05
Control (N=22) NS8.64±1.472.14±0.05
Exposed (N=33) S17.87±2.07f,g2.21±0.04f,g
Exposed (N=17) NS20.24±2.49h2.09±0.08h

[i] Significant differences (p<0.05, non-parametric Mann Whitney U test) are in bold typeface. 1000 binuclear cells per subject were analysed. a – controls vs exposed workers; b – control women vs control men; d – control women vs exposed women; e – exposed men vs control men; f – exposed smokers vs exposed non-smokers; g – exposed smokers vs control smokers; h – exposed non-smokers vs control non-smokers. M – men; MNi – micronuclei; NBs – nuclear buds; NDI – nuclear division index; NPBs – nucleoplasmic bridges; NS – non-smokers; S– smokers; SE – standard error; TI– tail intensity; TL – tail length; W – women

Table 4

MN-FISH assay endpoints in lead-exposed and control subgroups

Parameters (mean±SE)Exposed group N=20Control group N=16
Age (years)39.6±2.0540.31±1.59
Gender8 women 12 men5 women 11 men
Smoking12 smokers 8 non-smokers10 smokers 6 non-smokers
Time of exposure (years)11.66±1.910
MNtotal22.70±2.278.25±0.84
C+ MNtotal8.15±1.803.69±0.47
C- MNtotal14.55±1.804.56±0.89
NBtotal2.75±0.534.18±1.01
C+ NBtotal0.35±0.210.75±0.28
C- NBtotal2.40±0.413.43±0.74
NPBtotal1.80±0.530.38±0.15
C+ NPBtotal0.05±0.050
C- NPBtotal1.75±0.540.38±0.15

[i] Significant differences (p<0.05, non-parametric Mann Whitney U test) are in bold typeface. 1000 binuclear cells per subject were analysed. C + MN – MN with centromeric signal; C- MN – MN without centromeric signal; C+ NB – NB with centromeric signal; C- NB – NB without centromeric signal; C+ NPB– NPB with centromeric signal; C- NPB – NPB without centromeric signal; MN – micronucleus; NBs – nuclear buds; NPBs – nucleoplasmic bridges; SE – standard error

Table 5

MN-FISH assay endpoints in lead-exposed and control subgroups by gender and smoking status

Exposed groupControl group
Parameters (mean±SE)Women (N=8)Men (N=12)Smokers (N=12)Non-smokers (N=8)Women (N=5)Men (N=11)Smokers (N=10)Non-smokers (N=6)
MNtotal 22.38±2.3322.92±3.5324.08±3.1720.14±2.786.6±1.4c9.00±1.00d9.8±1.03e,f5.67±0.56g
C+ MNtotal9.25±2.13b7.42±1.388.46±1.307.57±2.452.4±0.4c4.27±0.594.3±0.62r2.67±0.56g
C- MNtotal13.13±2.0015.5±2.7215.62±2.5212.57±2.174.2±1.46c,d4.73±1.155.5±1.36f3.00±0.00g
NBtotal2.88±0.61b2.67±0.812.85±0.772.57±0.612.4±1.125.00±1.335±1.482.83±1.01
C+NBtotal 0.13±0.130.5±0.340.46±0.310.14±0.140.2±0.21±0.381±0.420.33±0.21
C-NBtotal2.75±0.562.17±0.582.38±0.572.43±0.532.2±0.974±0.964±1.062.5±0.85
NPBtotal 1.5±0.422±0.851.69±0.582±1.130.6±0.40.27±0.140.5±0.220.17±0.17
C+NPBtotal 0.13±0.1300.08±0.0800000
C-NPBtotal 1.38±0.462±0.851.62±0.592±1.130.6±0.40.27±0.140.5±0.220.17±0.17

[i] Significant differences (p<0.05, non-parametric Mann Whitney U test) are in bold typeface. 1000 binuclear cells per subject were analysed. b exposed men vs exposed women; c control women vs exposed women; d control men vs exposed men; e – control non-smokers vs control smokers; f – exposed smokers vs control smokers; g – exposed non-smokers vs control non-smokers. C+ MN – MN with centromeric signal; C- MN – MN without centromeric signal; C+ NB – NB with centromeric signal; C- NB – NB without centromeric signal; C+ NPB– NPB with centromeric signal; C- NPB – NPB without centromeric signal; MN – micronucleus; NBs – nuclear buds; NPBs – nucleoplasmic bridges; SE – standard error

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aiht-2020-71-3427 | Journal eISSN: 1848-6312 (formerly 0004-1254) | Journal ISSN: 0004-1254
Language: English, Croatian
Page range: 339 - 352
Submitted on: May 1, 2020
Accepted on: Nov 1, 2020
Published on: Dec 31, 2020
Published by: Institute for Medical Research and Occupational Health
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2020 Vilena Kašuba, Mirta Milić, Davor Želježić, Marin Mladinić, Alica Pizent, Zorana Kljaković-Gašpić, Melita Balija, Irena Jukić, published by Institute for Medical Research and Occupational Health
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.