Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Chiral separation of beta-blockers by high-performance liquid chromatography and determination of bisoprolol enantiomers in surface waters Cover

Chiral separation of beta-blockers by high-performance liquid chromatography and determination of bisoprolol enantiomers in surface waters

Open Access
|Apr 2020

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Structures of the analysed beta-blockers (chiral centres are marked with an asterisk)
Structures of the analysed beta-blockers (chiral centres are marked with an asterisk)

Figure 2

Chromatographic separation of acebutolol, atenolol, bisoprolol, labetalol, and metoprolol enantiomers on the Chirobiotic V column using the MeOH:HAc:TEA (100:0.2:0.15) mobile phase, flow rate of 0.5 mL/min, and column temperature of 45 °C (detection wavelength 230 nm)
Chromatographic separation of acebutolol, atenolol, bisoprolol, labetalol, and metoprolol enantiomers on the Chirobiotic V column using the MeOH:HAc:TEA (100:0.2:0.15) mobile phase, flow rate of 0.5 mL/min, and column temperature of 45 °C (detection wavelength 230 nm)

Figure 3

Chromatograms of samples from the Kunraticky stream (A) and the Sava River (B), spiked with bisoprolol enantiomers at 12 μg/L after solid-phase extraction
Chromatograms of samples from the Kunraticky stream (A) and the Sava River (B), spiked with bisoprolol enantiomers at 12 μg/L after solid-phase extraction

Chromatographic parameters for beta-blockers separated on the Chirobiotic V column using the MeOH:HAc:TEA (100:0_2:0_15) mobile phase, flow rate of 0_5 mL/min, and column temperature of 45 °C (detection wavelength 230 nm)

AnalyteEnantiomerRetention time/minRskα
E113.19 1.12
AcebutololE213.991.431.241.12

E114.53 1.33
AtenololE215.381.371.461.10

BisoprololE110.851.300.741.12
E211.43 0.83

E117.490.651.771.03
LabetalolE218.113.061.821.26
E321.16 2.30
E423.672.412.691.17

E111.43 0.84
MetoprololE212.041.300.931.12

Expected and calculated concentrations of bisoprolol enantiomers and their recoveries in spiked samples of distilled and surface waters from Zagreb and Prague

Expected γ (μg/L)Calculated γ (μg/L)Recovery (%)

BIS 1BIS 2BIS 1BIS 2BIS 1BIS 2
Distilled water 112.0012.0012.0211.85100.298.8

Distilled water 2240.00240.00265.71264.58110.7110.2

Prague 112.0012.0013.1813.19109.8109.9

Prague 29.369.3610.0810.08107.7107.7

Prague 38.168.169.449.49115.7116.3

Sava 11.801.802.272.35126.3130.3

Sava 26.006.008.148.30135.7138.3

Sava 312.0012.0013.9014.31115.8119.3
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aiht-2020-71-3318 | Journal eISSN: 1848-6312 | Journal ISSN: 0004-1254
Language: English, Croatian, Slovenian
Page range: 56 - 62
Submitted on: Jul 1, 2019
Accepted on: Feb 1, 2020
Published on: Apr 9, 2020
Published by: Institute for Medical Research and Occupational Health
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2020 Marijana Pocrnić, Martin Ansorge, Magda Dovhunová, Iva Habinovec, Eva Tesařová, Nives Galić, published by Institute for Medical Research and Occupational Health
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.