Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Evaluation of current landscape architecture approaches in chosen cities in Poland and Slovakia Cover

Evaluation of current landscape architecture approaches in chosen cities in Poland and Slovakia

Open Access
|Jun 2022

References

  1. Calkins, M. (2009). Materials for sustainable sites. New Jersey: John Wiley and Son, 2009. 453 p.
  2. Flemming, V. (2021). Top 10 Landscape Trends for 2021. https://www.asalandscapearchitects.co.uk/articles/top-10-landscape-trends-for-2021/
  3. Grimm-Pretner, D. (2018). Contemporary issues in landscape architecture the challenge of designing green infrastructure. Plants in Urban Areas and Landscape. Conference proceedings Nitra: SPU, 2018, pp. 3–6. DOI:10.15414/PUAL/2018.3-6
  4. Hubačíková, V., Marková, J., & Dimitrova, A. (2020). Green roofs and vertical gardens as part of the urban green space. Public recreation and landscape protection, 194.
  5. JMF Landscaping (2020, October 26). 20 Landscaping Trends for 2021. https://jmflandscaping.com/20-landscaping-trends-2021/
  6. Kousis, I., Pigliautile, I., & Pisello, A. L. (2021). A Mobile Vehicle-Based Methodology for Dynamic Microclimate Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research, 15(5), 893–901. DOI: 10.1007/s41742-021-00349-7
  7. Mabon, L., & Shih, W. Y. (2021). Urban greenspace as a climate change adaptation strategy for subtropical Asian cities: A comparative study across cities in three countries. Global Environmental Change, 68, 102248. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102248
  8. Mandziuk, A., Fornal-Pieniak, B., Stangierska, D., Parzych, S., & Widera, K. (2021a). Social Preferences of Young Adults Regarding Urban Forest Recreation Management in Warsaw, Poland. Forests, 12(11), 1524. DOI:10.3390/f12111524
  9. Mandziuk, A., Fornal-Pieniak, B., & Ollik, M. (2021b). The willingness of inhabitants in medium-sized city and the city’s surroundings settlements to pay for recreation in urban forests in Poland. iForest-Biogeosciences and Forestry, 14(5), 483. DOI:10.3832/ifor3758-014
  10. Óhegyi, E., Bihuňová, M., Dostál, P., Weber-Siwirska, M., & Zaryn, M. (2017). Smart and Green, The Future of Visegrád Cities. CEEweb for biodiversity and APU in Nitra, 2017. 50
  11. Prominski, M., Stokman, A., Stimberg, D., Voermanek, H., Zeller, S., & Bajc, K. (2017). River. space. design: planning strategies, methods and projects for urban rivers. Birkhäuser.
  12. Ring, Z., Reinwald, F., & Damyanovic, D. (2020). Biotope city – Vienna as a contribution to sustainable, climate-sensitive urban open spaces. Urban areas and Landscape, 10–18. DOI:10.15414/PUAL/2020.10-18
  13. Seçkin, N. P. (2018). Environmental control in architecture by landscape design. A/Z ITU J. Fac. Archit, 15, 197–211.
  14. Shchur, A., Lobikava, N., & Lobikava, V. (2020). Revitalization of (Post-) Soviet Neighbourhood with Nature-Based Solutions. Acta Horticulturae et Regiotecturae, 23(2), 76–80. DOI 10.2478/ahr-2020-0016
  15. Supuka, J. (2008). Novodobé trendy v tvorbe prírodných parkov a ekologických sietí v mestách. In Vegetačné štruktúry v sídlach, 81–91. Nitra: SPU.
  16. Svítek, M., & Postránecký, M. (2018). Města budoucnosti. Nadatur.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ahr-2022-0004 | Journal eISSN: 1338-5259 | Journal ISSN: 1335-2563
Language: English
Page range: 28 - 36
Submitted on: Jan 14, 2022
|
Accepted on: Feb 16, 2022
|
Published on: Jun 14, 2022
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2022 Beata Fornal-Pienak, Mária Bihuňová, published by Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.