Effects of different insulation temperatures of an inflatable insulation system on patients receiving right hemicolectomy using the laparoscopic caudal approach

Group	Age (Y)	Gender (M/F)	Basal body temperature (°C)	ASA grade (I/II)	TNM stage (II/III/IV)
A (n=33)	59.61±3.23	18/15	36.21±0.36	14/19	8/16/9
B (n=33)	57.81±3.64	17/16	36.54±0.35	15/18	7/15/11
C (n=33)	60.07±3.21	17/16	36.37±0.34	16/17	8/17/8
D (n=33)	58.52±3.14	16/17	36.07±0.28	15/18	9/12/12
t/χ₂	0.215	0.204	0.224	0.227	0.218
P	0.121	0.132	0.116	0.112	0.119

Table 2

Perioperative indicators in the four groups

Group	Operation time (min)	Anesthesia duration (min)	Intraoperative blood loss (mL)	Intraoperative infusion volume (mL)	Urine volume (mL)	Abdominal flushing volume (mL)
A (n=33)	180.3±54.5	203.4±41.3	51.23±14.35	205.6±31.4	755±289	1230±234
B (n=33)	183.8±50.8	205.6±42.5	53.80±13.89	209.8±35.6	734±211	1338±239
C (n=33)	182.6±46.7	202.9±48.9	52.77±15.00	203.4±28.9	769±234	1340±278
D (n=33)	181.9±53.2	204.8±48.7	52.09±14.35	205.4±23.1	750±287	1389±290
t/x2	0.338	0.285	0.370	0.458	0.799	0.189
P	0.103	0.112	0.096	0.120	0.198	0.811

Core temperatures (nasopharyngeal temperatures) at different time points. ^a P < 0.05 vs. Group B, ^b P < 0.05 vs. Group C

Hemodynamic blood coagulation indices at different time points. ^a P < 0.05 vs. T0, ^b P < 0.05 vs. T5. At T3, ^c P < 0.05 vs. Group B, ^d P < 0.05 vs. Group D

Levels of stress indicators and inflammatory factors at different time points. ^a P < 0.05 vs. T0. At the same time point, ^b P < 0.05 vs. Group A, ^c P < 0.05 vs. Group B, ^d P < 0.05 vs. Group D

Hemodynamic parameters at different time points. At the same time point, ^a P < 0.05 vs. Group B, ^b P < 0.05 vs. Group D

Rapid blood glucose levels at different time points (mmol/L). At the same time point, ^a P < 0.05 vs. Group B, ^b P < 0.05 vs. Group D

Table 3

Anesthesia waking time and extubation time

Group	Anesthesia waking time (min)	Extubation time (min)
A (n=33)	17.23±1.74^a, ^b	22.41±1.97^a, ^b
B (n=33)	22.67±2.23^c	28.63±2.29^c
C (n=33)	14.61±3.51^b	19.84±3.62^c
D (n=33)	28.07±2.57	33.32±3.02

a P < 0.05 vs. Group B

b P < 0.05 vs. Group C

c P < 0.05 vs. Group D

Table 4

Postoperative BIS values

Group	BIS at propofol discontinuation	Time from propofol discontinuation to BIS ≥ 80 (min)	Propofol effect compartment concentration at BIS ≥ 80 (mg/L)
A (n=33)	55.39±5.17	26.23±2.16^a, ^b	1.03±0.23^a, ^b
B (n=33)	54.76±5.12	22.16±2.11^c	0.81±0.21^c
C (n=33)	53.87±5.21	15.97±1.47^c	1.32±0.29^c
D (n=33)	54.26±5.23	30.51±3.01	0.69±0.07

a P < 0.05 vs. Group B

b P < 0.05 vs. Group C

c P < 0.05 vs. Group D

Table 5

Intervention frequency

Group	Intervention frequency (min)
A (n=33)	2.69±0.21^a, ^b
B (n=33)	2.15±0.19^c
C (n=33)	1.03±0.11^b
D (n=33)	3.27±0.26

a P < 0.05 vs. Group B

b P < 0.05 vs. Group C

c P < 0.05 vs. Group D

References

Authors

Metrics

Articles in this issue

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ahem-2022-0044 | Journal eISSN: 1732-2693

Journal RSS Feed

Language: English

Page range: 395 - 401

Submitted on: Nov 29, 2021

Accepted on: May 3, 2022

Published on: Sep 12, 2022

Published by: Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy

In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

Keywords:

insulation temperature,

inflatable insulation system,

Related subjects:

Microbiology and virology,

Medicine,

Basic medical science,

Immunology

© 2022 Yuanyuan Li, Daorong Wang, published by Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Volume 76 (2022): Issue 1 (January 2022)

Effects of different insulation temperatures of an inflatable insulation system on patients receiving right hemicolectomy using the laparoscopic caudal approach

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Table 2

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

Paradigm

My account