Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Effects of different insulation temperatures of an inflatable insulation system on patients receiving right hemicolectomy using the laparoscopic caudal approach Cover

Effects of different insulation temperatures of an inflatable insulation system on patients receiving right hemicolectomy using the laparoscopic caudal approach

By: Yuanyuan Li and  Daorong Wang  
Open Access
|Sep 2022

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1

Core temperatures (nasopharyngeal temperatures) at different time points. a P < 0.05 vs. Group B, b P < 0.05 vs. Group C
Core temperatures (nasopharyngeal temperatures) at different time points. a P < 0.05 vs. Group B, b P < 0.05 vs. Group C

Fig. 2

Hemodynamic blood coagulation indices at different time points. a P < 0.05 vs. T0, b P < 0.05 vs. T5. At T3, c P < 0.05 vs. Group B, d P < 0.05 vs. Group D
Hemodynamic blood coagulation indices at different time points. a P < 0.05 vs. T0, b P < 0.05 vs. T5. At T3, c P < 0.05 vs. Group B, d P < 0.05 vs. Group D

Fig. 3

Levels of stress indicators and inflammatory factors at different time points. a P < 0.05 vs. T0. At the same time point, b P < 0.05 vs. Group A, c P < 0.05 vs. Group B, d P < 0.05 vs. Group D
Levels of stress indicators and inflammatory factors at different time points. a P < 0.05 vs. T0. At the same time point, b P < 0.05 vs. Group A, c P < 0.05 vs. Group B, d P < 0.05 vs. Group D

Fig. 4

Hemodynamic parameters at different time points. At the same time point, a P < 0.05 vs. Group B, b P < 0.05 vs. Group D
Hemodynamic parameters at different time points. At the same time point, a P < 0.05 vs. Group B, b P < 0.05 vs. Group D

Fig. 5

Rapid blood glucose levels at different time points (mmol/L). At the same time point, a P < 0.05 vs. Group B, b P < 0.05 vs. Group D
Rapid blood glucose levels at different time points (mmol/L). At the same time point, a P < 0.05 vs. Group B, b P < 0.05 vs. Group D

Anesthesia waking time and extubation time

GroupAnesthesia waking time (min)Extubation time (min)
A (n=33)17.23±1.74ab22.41±1.97ab
B (n=33)22.67±2.23c28.63±2.29c
C (n=33)14.61±3.51b19.84±3.62c
D (n=33)28.07±2.5733.32±3.02

General data of patients with colorectal cancer in the four groups

GroupAge (Y)Gender (M/F)Basal body temperature (°C)ASA grade (I/II)TNM stage (II/III/IV)
A (n=33)59.61±3.2318/1536.21±0.3614/198/16/9
B (n=33)57.81±3.6417/1636.54±0.3515/187/15/11
C (n=33)60.07±3.2117/1636.37±0.3416/178/17/8
D (n=33)58.52±3.1416/1736.07±0.2815/189/12/12
t/χ20.2150.2040.2240.2270.218
P0.1210.1320.1160.1120.119

Perioperative indicators in the four groups

GroupOperation time (min)Anesthesia duration (min)Intraoperative blood loss (mL)Intraoperative infusion volume (mL)Urine volume (mL)Abdominal flushing volume (mL)
A (n=33)180.3±54.5203.4±41.351.23±14.35205.6±31.4755±2891230±234
B (n=33)183.8±50.8205.6±42.553.80±13.89209.8±35.6734±2111338±239
C (n=33)182.6±46.7202.9±48.952.77±15.00203.4±28.9769±2341340±278
D (n=33)181.9±53.2204.8±48.752.09±14.35205.4±23.1750±2871389±290
t/x20.3380.2850.3700.4580.7990.189
P0.1030.1120.0960.1200.1980.811

Intervention frequency

GroupIntervention frequency (min)
A (n=33)2.69±0.21ab
B (n=33)2.15±0.19c
C (n=33)1.03±0.11b
D (n=33)3.27±0.26

Postoperative BIS values

GroupBIS at propofol discontinuationTime from propofol discontinuation to BIS ≥ 80 (min)Propofol effect compartment concentration at BIS ≥ 80 (mg/L)
A (n=33)55.39±5.1726.23±2.16ab1.03±0.23ab
B (n=33)54.76±5.1222.16±2.11c0.81±0.21c
C (n=33)53.87±5.2115.97±1.47c1.32±0.29c
D (n=33)54.26±5.2330.51±3.010.69±0.07
Language: English
Page range: 395 - 401
Submitted on: Nov 29, 2021
Accepted on: May 3, 2022
Published on: Sep 12, 2022
Published by: Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 Yuanyuan Li, Daorong Wang, published by Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.